Jepi — CS2 Stats

76561197992610636[U:1:32344908]

2,794Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAggressive Rifler

CSDB Leaderboard#40723 of 45205 tracked

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,057 +0 28 Aug – 29 Aug · 2 observations

2,057Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

2Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,057
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 443 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72

Positioning60

Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateLWWLTLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.2

Aggression9.2

Utility6.8

Positioning6.0

Opening Duels3.8

Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like jL 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2

Positioning6.0

Utility6.8

Mechanics5.8

Opening Duels3.8

Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time545ms−19ms

first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 545ms

Headshot accuracy17.8%+1.7%

first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 13–9

13–2Biggest win — dust2

7Longest win streak

7–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 70% over 10mirageWeakest map · 33% over 15

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	35	20–15	57%	0.00
mirage	D	15	5–10	33%	-0.03
nuke	B	12	6–6	50%	0.02
inferno	B	11	5–6	45%	-0.01
ancient	S	10	7–3	70%	0.01
cache	A	9	5–4	56%	0.00
anubis	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.01
poseidon	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.07
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,725Matches

51%Win rate

1.03Avg K/D

76.8ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

18%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	129	50%	1.04	14.9
Mirage	127	39%	0.90	14.2
Ancient	101	60%	0.97	15.4
Dust2	96	56%	1.12	15.3
Nuke	74	53%	1.03	16.0
Overpass	58	64%	1.18	16.7
Anubis	55	47%	0.90	13.9
Vertigo	24	46%	0.95	14.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy

34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.2%Spray accuracy

76.3%Counter-strafing

9.8°Preaim

539msReaction time

35.5%T opening success

55.1%CT opening success

0.59Enemies flashed / flash

13.0%Flash assists

6.59HE damage / grenade

18.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.4694% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	8–13	0.00	32%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	26%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	21%	18 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	26%	18 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.01	30%	17 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.00	14%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.04	23%	16 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	13%	15 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.01	24%	14 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.04	21%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.03	16%	11 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.00	26%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.05	7%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.03	15%	10 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	17%	10 Aug →
ancient	16–13	0.04	16%	6 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.05	9%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	7%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.07	24%	5 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	19%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.03	16%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	5%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.01	24%	27 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	12%	27 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.01	15%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.02	14%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	13%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.12	20%	26 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.01	19%	26 Jul →
poseidon	9–6	0.03	9%	23 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.03	15%	23 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.04	21%	22 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.01	19%	22 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	8%	22 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.01	21%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	16%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.10	20%	20 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.05	5%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.11	18%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.02	32%	16 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.07	16%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.07	45%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.02	17%	15 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	8%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.02	15%	14 Jul →
poseidon	5–9	0.03	30%	13 Jul →
nuke	4–9	-0.01	12%	13 Jul →
poseidon	0–9	-0.26	0%	13 Jul →
nuke	14–16	-0.01	20%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	26%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–2	-0.01	7%	13 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	4%	12 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.06	6%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	2%	11 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	10%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.04	15%	10 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	18%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.14	29%	8 Jul →
nuke	16–12	0.01	17%	7 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.02	22%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.03	14%	7 Jul →
inferno	13–16	-0.03	15%	7 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	11%	6 Jul →
dust2	16–13	-0.02	13%	6 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.01	22%	5 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	21%	5 Jul →
train	13–3	0.05	22%	3 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.08	18%	3 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.06	8%	2 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	15%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.06	12%	1 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	17%	1 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.02	22%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.02	11%	1 Jul →
nuke	15–15	0.07	14%	25 Jun →
anubis	6–13	-0.05	10%	23 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	12%	22 Jun →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	14%	22 Jun →
anubis	6–13	-0.05	16%	20 Jun →
dust2	17–19	-0.01	13%	15 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	23%	14 Jun →
ancient	16–13	-0.01	15%	11 Jun →
cache	14–16	-0.03	15%	3 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.03	23%	3 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	12%	3 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	14%	2 Jun →
cache	13–7	-0.03	14%	2 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.02	15%	2 Jun →
mirage	12–16	-0.01	23%	2 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	26%	1 Jun →
dust2	28–25	-0.01	17%	1 Jun →
dust2	3–13	-0.09	9%	31 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	14%	31 May →
cache	13–10	0.01	10%	31 May →
dust2	13–11	0.05	20%	31 May →
ancient	6–13	0.03	20%	30 May →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	23%	28 May →
inferno	11–13	0.01	17%	28 May →
dust2	13–3	0.02	22%	28 May →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	20%	27 May →