🅰🅿🅾🆂🆃🅾🅻🅸 — CS2 Stats

76561197992355826[U:1:32090098]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,271Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport

Premier CS Rating27,059Top 5% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#6212 of 259985 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 2,341 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,059 +1,097 30 Aug – 3 Nov · 14 days played

Faceit ELO: 2,341 +0 30 Aug – 15 Sept · 2 observations

27,429Peak Premier in tracked matches

2,341Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

31Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,341
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 159 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 27,059
+1,547 over 30 days · improving
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,941 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-08-30
Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76

Positioning59

Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–50–1Last 10049%Win rateLLLWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +3.1pp headshot accuracy · +24ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 23%
Avg reaction 608ms

Last 10

5–5 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 20%
Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

10–10 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 19%
Avg reaction 538ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.6

Utility6.1

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels4.4

Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like m0NESY 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6

Positioning5.9

Utility6.1

Mechanics6.7

Opening Duels5.8

Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time559ms+6ms

first ⅓ avg 553ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms

Headshot accuracy18.0%+1.3%

first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 10–3 · nuke, 30 Oct →

33%Best headshot accuracy · 10–3 · nuke, 30 Oct →

406msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · nuke, 11 Oct →

13–2Biggest win · inferno, 25 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak

L3Current streak

13–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 21anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	S	21	15–6	71%	-0.00
nuke	A	20	12–8	60%	0.02
ancient	B	19	10–9	53%	-0.01
inferno	D	18	6–12	33%	-0.00
mirage	C	11	4–7	36%	-0.00
anubis	D	7	1–6	14%	-0.01
dust2	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,444Matches

51%Win rate

1.03Avg K/D

76.2ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	219	57%	1.06	15.2
Nuke	187	47%	1.02	14.8
Ancient	161	40%	0.88	13.8
Anubis	85	48%	1.04	15.9
Overpass	85	64%	0.99	15.6
Dust2	82	44%	0.93	14.4
Cache	76	53%	0.94	15.3
Mirage	68	51%	0.90	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy

36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.4%Spray accuracy

80.3%Counter-strafing

9.7°Preaim

552msReaction time

50.8%T opening success

55.3%CT opening success

0.58Enemies flashed / flash

5.3%Flash assists

9.39HE damage / grenade

10.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	6–13	-0.01	21%	4 Nov →
cache	9–13	-0.03	24%	4 Nov →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	24%	3 Nov →
ancient	13–10	0.09	19%	3 Nov →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	26%	2 Nov →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	10%	1 Nov →
mirage	13–11	0.03	33%	1 Nov →
anubis	5–13	-0.06	21%	30 Oct →
inferno	8–13	0.03	10%	30 Oct →
nuke	13–10	0.04	15%	30 Oct →
nuke	10–3	0.10	33%	30 Oct →
cache	10–13	0.04	15%	29 Oct →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	7%	29 Oct →
ancient	13–3	0.02	17%	29 Oct →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	25%	29 Oct →
mirage	13–4	0.04	20%	29 Oct →
nuke	13–6	-0.00	13%	29 Oct →
inferno	13–11	0.00	10%	29 Oct →
ancient	5–13	-0.01	15%	28 Oct →
ancient	13–16	-0.06	14%	28 Oct →
nuke	13–9	0.01	14%	26 Oct →
inferno	11–13	0.02	21%	26 Oct →
inferno	11–13	0.02	22%	25 Oct →
cache	13–6	0.03	22%	25 Oct →
cache	13–11	-0.00	10%	25 Oct →
anubis	6–13	0.05	13%	25 Oct →
inferno	13–2	0.04	12%	25 Oct →
inferno	10–13	0.00	15%	23 Oct →
cache	13–8	0.03	17%	23 Oct →
nuke	13–10	0.06	13%	23 Oct →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	18%	23 Oct →
cache	6–13	0.01	29%	23 Oct →
ancient	13–10	0.03	15%	23 Oct →
cache	13–10	0.03	17%	22 Oct →
nuke	13–4	-0.01	22%	22 Oct →
cache	13–11	-0.01	15%	22 Oct →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	6%	22 Oct →
cache	13–11	-0.01	15%	21 Oct →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	15%	21 Oct →
mirage	6–13	0.05	27%	21 Oct →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	11%	19 Oct →
cache	2–13	-0.07	19%	19 Oct →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	18%	19 Oct →
cache	13–9	-0.04	13%	18 Oct →
ancient	11–13	-0.07	13%	18 Oct →
mirage	13–9	0.00	17%	18 Oct →
inferno	13–11	0.03	18%	18 Oct →
nuke	8–13	0.03	19%	18 Oct →
nuke	15–19	-0.02	16%	17 Oct →
cache	13–9	-0.00	22%	17 Oct →
nuke	13–9	0.09	18%	17 Oct →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	18%	17 Oct →
ancient	13–16	0.02	20%	16 Oct →
cache	13–6	0.06	26%	16 Oct →
ancient	11–13	0.02	29%	16 Oct →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	20%	16 Oct →
nuke	16–13	-0.01	13%	16 Oct →
cache	13–10	-0.01	13%	16 Oct →
nuke	13–8	0.10	20%	15 Oct →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	19%	15 Oct →
ancient	13–10	-0.00	23%	15 Oct →
inferno	7–13	-0.09	22%	15 Oct →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	19%	15 Oct →
inferno	10–13	0.00	16%	15 Oct →
nuke	13–10	0.05	18%	15 Oct →
mirage	11–13	0.00	20%	14 Oct →
ancient	13–8	0.02	15%	14 Oct →
cache	13–11	-0.00	21%	14 Oct →
inferno	15–15	-0.04	13%	14 Oct →
ancient	13–4	0.05	19%	13 Oct →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	24%	13 Oct →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	19%	13 Oct →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	18%	12 Oct →
nuke	9–13	0.03	14%	12 Oct →
ancient	13–9	-0.04	25%	11 Oct →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	9%	11 Oct →
cache	11–13	-0.02	21%	11 Oct →
ancient	3–13	-0.06	16%	8 Oct →
nuke	13–8	0.03	12%	8 Oct →
cache	13–8	0.01	10%	7 Oct →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	15%	6 Oct →
nuke	13–11	0.03	14%	1 Oct →
anubis	6–13	-0.01	16%	30 Sept →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	22%	30 Sept →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	19%	30 Sept →
cache	13–11	0.01	8%	30 Sept →
cache	13–8	-0.07	19%	29 Sept →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	32%	29 Sept →
anubis	13–11	0.04	16%	28 Sept →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	15%	28 Sept →
cache	7–13	-0.05	14%	28 Sept →
inferno	11–13	0.00	11%	27 Sept →
inferno	13–16	-0.05	12%	27 Sept →
inferno	13–9	0.02	15%	26 Sept →
inferno	13–11	0.05	21%	26 Sept →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	13%	26 Sept →
cache	13–11	0.06	13%	26 Sept →
dust2	13–11	0.02	20%	26 Sept →
inferno	11–13	-0.00	23%	25 Sept →
nuke	14–16	-0.02	16%	25 Sept →