fr0tao

fr0tao — CS2 Stats

BR76561197991223721[U:1:30957993]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,111Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,886Top 5% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7407 of 261521 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,171 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Nov 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,886 -189 15 Sept – 2 Nov · 19 days played
26,29428,132peak 28,13215 Sept2 Nov
28,237Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,171Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
19Days played since 2026-09-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,171
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 329 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,246 below peak (28,132)
  • -900 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,114 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfr0taoFACEITLevel 10 · 2,171 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,886 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,171csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning76
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–51–1Last 10048%Win rateWLLWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · −53ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility4.9
Positioning7.6
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning7.6
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels5.9
Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time523ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 516ms → last ⅓ avg 523ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–2 · anubis, 2 Nov →
69%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · dust2, 22 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · ancient, 2 Nov →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 22 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
11–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 15mirageWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C188–1044%0.04
cacheA159–660%0.06
nukeB158–753%0.04
anubisA148–657%0.04
mirageC145–936%0.03
infernoC135–838%0.02
ancientB115–645%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

750Matches
55%Win rate
1.51Avg K/D
103.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust26659%1.6621.7
Mirage5841%1.3118.5
Nuke5054%1.5522.2
Ancient4858%1.4521.5
Inferno4139%1.4120.9
Anubis3946%1.3320.6
Cache1275%1.4521.3
Train1155%1.5421.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
40.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
80.0%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
521msReaction time
52.2%T opening success
55.3%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
10.32HE damage / grenade
4.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–20.2025%2 Nov →
cache3–130.0325%2 Nov →
nuke8–130.1016%2 Nov →
dust213–8-0.0216%2 Nov →
mirage13–110.0319%2 Nov →
inferno16–140.0819%2 Nov →
ancient13–110.1020%2 Nov →
nuke5–130.0421%2 Nov →
anubis13–30.0925%2 Nov →
dust29–130.0321%2 Nov →
inferno7–130.0717%2 Nov →
nuke9–130.0715%2 Nov →
dust211–13-0.0126%1 Nov →
cache11–130.0214%1 Nov →
nuke13–20.0126%1 Nov →
cache11–130.0111%1 Nov →
dust211–13-0.0024%1 Nov →
mirage13–100.0919%1 Nov →
inferno8–130.0314%1 Nov →
ancient6–13-0.0029%1 Nov →
cache13–70.1619%31 Oct →
nuke16–120.0716%31 Oct →
mirage7–130.0415%31 Oct →
ancient7–130.0315%31 Oct →
dust210–130.0326%31 Oct →
anubis13–70.0814%31 Oct →
cache13–30.1919%31 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0320%31 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0016%31 Oct →
dust211–130.0117%31 Oct →
dust213–110.0917%31 Oct →
cache13–20.0821%31 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0712%31 Oct →
dust216–140.0719%31 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0217%31 Oct →
nuke13–40.0317%31 Oct →
anubis13–110.0516%31 Oct →
inferno4–130.0119%31 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0813%31 Oct →
cache14–160.0718%30 Oct →
anubis16–130.017%30 Oct →
cache8–130.0116%30 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0111%30 Oct →
cache13–90.0515%30 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0118%30 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0012%30 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0120%30 Oct →
nuke13–80.0124%30 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.028%18 Oct →
inferno13–100.026%18 Oct →
nuke13–70.0613%18 Oct →
mirage13–90.0617%18 Oct →
dust29–130.0713%18 Oct →
cache13–30.0610%18 Oct →
mirage0–6-0.0750%17 Oct →
nuke13–40.159%17 Oct →
anubis8–130.0614%17 Oct →
dust213–80.1415%17 Oct →
mirage11–130.0314%17 Oct →
nuke0–130.0214%14 Oct →
dust216–140.0320%14 Oct →
cache13–90.0616%14 Oct →
mirage7–130.0313%11 Oct →
mirage11–130.0121%11 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0115%11 Oct →
dust211–130.0419%11 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0219%10 Oct →
anubis5–130.0628%10 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0116%9 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0324%9 Oct →
mirage16–140.0314%9 Oct →
dust213–40.0922%9 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0523%9 Oct →
dust29–130.0324%3 Oct →
anubis3–130.0325%1 Oct →
ancient13–80.0927%1 Oct →
inferno8–130.0015%1 Oct →
dust27–130.0313%1 Oct →
inferno13–70.0713%1 Oct →
anubis13–80.0117%30 Sept →
nuke13–110.0418%30 Sept →
dust213–90.1218%30 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.1140%30 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0119%28 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0117%26 Sept →
cache9–130.0120%26 Sept →
anubis13–110.0614%26 Sept →
inferno15–150.0413%25 Sept →
cache7–10.0711%25 Sept →
mirage6–130.057%25 Sept →
mirage7–130.0716%23 Sept →
ancient13–80.0313%23 Sept →
mirage13–10.0619%23 Sept →
cache13–80.1214%23 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0111%23 Sept →
nuke13–50.0720%23 Sept →
cache13–100.0417%22 Sept →
dust213–00.0469%22 Sept →
inferno5–130.0111%15 Sept →
anubis13–110.0112%15 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.