knx

knx — CS2 Stats

JM76561197989002821[U:1:28737093]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,174Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,300Top 10% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19550 of 261645 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,385 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Nov 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,300 +8,608 16 Jun – 7 Nov · 25 days played
16,12725,889peak 25,88916 Jun7 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,385 +0 30 Aug – 24 Oct · 6 observations
1,3851,385peak 1,38530 Aug24 Oct
25,889Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,385Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
60Days played since 2026-05-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,385
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 146 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 589 below peak (25,889)
  • -589 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,700 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-21
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGknxFACEITLevel 8 · 1,385 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,300 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,385csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning56
Utility77

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–42–7Last 10051%Win rateLLWTLWLLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 10

  • 2–6–2 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility7.7
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch3.4

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 77 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.6
Utility7.7
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact8.1

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time556ms−82ms
first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%+3.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 5 Sept →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · mirage, 18 Jul →
406msFastest reaction time · 6–8 · anubis, 14 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 9 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
9–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 12infernoWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2714–1352%0.01
mirageB2612–1446%0.02
infernoC145–936%0.00
cacheS129–375%0.01
anubisC73–443%-0.00
ancientA74–357%0.01
nukeB63–350%0.02
overpass—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,077Matches
49%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
74.8ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage28849%1.1614.8
Dust224945%1.0714.8
Inferno15648%1.1715.1
Ancient15256%1.2214.9
Nuke8055%1.2315.3
Anubis7141%1.0213.7
Cache3033%1.0416.9
Overpass2748%1.2115.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
74.0%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
554msReaction time
38.8%T opening success
42.1%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
17.1%Flash assists
8.56HE damage / grenade
18.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.7766% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–130.0717%12 Nov →
dust210–130.0920%7 Nov →
dust213–50.0715%28 Oct →
dust212–120.0323%23 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0525%22 Oct →
cache13–10-0.058%7 Oct →
inferno8–130.0320%3 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0324%30 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0421%28 Sept →
dust212–120.0221%28 Sept →
inferno13–60.0323%23 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0213%21 Sept →
anubis6–80.0519%14 Sept →
ancient13–110.0414%10 Sept →
inferno13–90.0821%9 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0217%9 Sept →
cache13–110.038%8 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.0112%8 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0528%8 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0122%7 Sept →
mirage13–110.049%7 Sept →
mirage13–50.0812%7 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0420%6 Sept →
inferno13–50.0214%6 Sept →
dust213–30.076%6 Sept →
mirage11–130.0320%6 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0221%5 Sept →
dust213–40.1015%5 Sept →
cache13–100.0713%5 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0318%5 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0121%5 Sept →
mirage9–130.0520%4 Sept →
inferno8–130.0118%3 Sept →
mirage13–90.0114%2 Sept →
cache13–50.0417%2 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0411%2 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.059%1 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0111%31 Aug →
ancient13–2-0.0215%31 Aug →
mirage13–70.0415%31 Aug →
cache11–130.0410%30 Aug →
anubis13–70.0210%30 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0116%30 Aug →
mirage13–40.0210%30 Aug →
inferno13–110.017%29 Aug →
ancient13–50.0912%27 Aug →
anubis11–130.0225%26 Aug →
cache13–90.029%24 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.006%21 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0113%19 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0320%12 Aug →
ancient13–160.0013%6 Aug →
mirage15–150.058%4 Aug →
nuke5–130.0011%4 Aug →
mirage10–130.0024%2 Aug →
dust213–70.0826%2 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0415%2 Aug →
nuke13–90.0330%2 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0717%28 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0427%22 Jul →
dust213–90.0319%20 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0320%19 Jul →
cache13–100.0212%19 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0417%18 Jul →
mirage7–130.0832%18 Jul →
cache13–50.045%17 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0118%15 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0713%12 Jul →
nuke15–150.0415%9 Jul →
anubis13–10.0014%9 Jul →
mirage11–130.0215%9 Jul →
nuke6–00.0815%9 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0021%9 Jul →
mirage13–80.036%9 Jul →
dust213–110.0520%5 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0123%4 Jul →
dust28–130.0311%2 Jul →
dust213–50.037%1 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0413%30 Jun →
overpass13–70.0417%30 Jun →
mirage15–15-0.0111%30 Jun →
anubis8–130.0011%30 Jun →
mirage10–130.019%29 Jun →
dust28–0-0.050%29 Jun →
mirage13–70.0723%29 Jun →
dust213–80.0321%18 Jun →
inferno5–130.0318%18 Jun →
inferno8–130.009%17 Jun →
mirage13–40.0416%17 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0227%17 Jun →
mirage15–150.0712%16 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0611%31 May →
mirage13–50.093%27 May →
cache11–130.0113%26 May →
dust211–13-0.0219%25 May →
mirage13–90.0721%24 May →
dust213–50.0422%23 May →
anubis1–13-0.1014%21 May →
dust210–13-0.048%21 May →
cache13–9-0.034%19 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.