Da_N4pL — CS2 Stats

76561197988706635[U:1:28440907]

545Tracked matches69%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDa_N4pLFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning46
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45514Last 10045%Win rateWLWWWWLLTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression5.4
Utility4.5
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 615ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.6
Utility4.5
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time627ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 672ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%+6.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — dust2 13–6
132Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 100% over 5infernoWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B35171849%-0.01
mirageC2081240%-0.01
ancientB158753%0.00
infernoD1441029%-0.04
nukeD62433%-0.02
anubisS550100%0.01
overpass41325%-0.03
cache1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

407Matches
52%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
69.9ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

17%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno8855%1.0612.9
Nuke5857%0.9315.0
Mirage5443%0.9012.0
Vertigo5149%0.8912.6
Overpass4052%0.9113.4
Ancient3158%0.8713.1
Dust22065%0.9013.5
Anubis520%0.6711.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
74.7%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
615msReaction time
26.3%T opening success
45.5%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
8.28HE damage / grenade
4.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.2655% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–60.0110%29 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0711%29 Aug
nuke13–50.0118%29 Aug
anubis13–30.0626%29 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0120%29 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0022%29 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0215%28 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0222%28 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0121%28 Aug
dust213–8-0.0629%27 Aug
dust213–7-0.0617%27 Aug
ancient11–130.0240%27 Aug
dust213–3-0.0034%27 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0124%28 Jun
ancient11–5-0.0523%28 Jun
overpass13–50.0113%27 Jun
ancient11–10.0240%27 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0911%27 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0229%27 Jun
ancient13–50.0219%27 Jun
dust213–80.0828%27 Jun
mirage8–130.0020%26 Jun
ancient13–20.0121%26 Jun
anubis16–140.0215%26 Jun
mirage9–130.0329%19 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0229%19 Jun
ancient13–80.0022%18 Jun
mirage13–110.0614%18 Jun
inferno5–130.0027%18 Jun
dust213–80.0428%17 Jun
dust213–2-0.0127%17 Jun
dust213–60.0025%17 Jun
mirage13–100.0120%17 Jun
anubis8–1-0.0129%17 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0511%17 Jun
ancient13–70.0917%17 Jun
mirage8–130.0223%17 Jun
ancient12–16-0.0518%17 Jun
dust210–130.0221%17 Jun
dust26–13-0.0122%17 Jun
overpass6–130.0025%14 Jun
inferno6–13-0.069%14 Jun
dust211–13-0.0518%13 Jun
mirage13–40.067%13 Jun
mirage16–130.0119%13 Jun
dust213–60.0933%13 Jun
ancient10–13-0.089%13 Jun
mirage13–70.0514%13 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0121%13 Jun
mirage15–150.0013%13 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0228%13 Jun
dust29–130.0322%11 Jun
dust213–90.0827%11 Jun
dust213–6-0.0126%10 Jun
mirage3–10-0.0412%9 Jun
inferno6–13-0.1021%8 Jun
dust213–4-0.0614%8 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0331%7 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0224%4 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0718%4 Jun
dust22–13-0.105%4 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0516%4 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0812%2 Jun
dust213–6-0.0013%2 Jun
dust29–13-0.0520%1 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0522%1 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0921%30 May
mirage3–13-0.0412%26 May
mirage13–40.0521%25 May
dust27–13-0.0316%25 May
dust213–9-0.0121%22 May
dust210–13-0.0423%13 May
nuke7–13-0.0215%12 May
overpass5–13-0.0514%11 May
dust210–130.0118%11 May
inferno8–13-0.0222%10 May
nuke6–13-0.048%8 May
inferno4–13-0.0213%8 May
dust23–13-0.1017%8 May
cache11–13-0.0321%8 May
dust29–130.0214%6 May
dust27–13-0.024%6 May
dust211–13-0.0126%6 May
dust213–6-0.0724%6 May
overpass5–13-0.1017%4 May
inferno13–11-0.0616%4 May
dust213–50.0925%4 May
ancient7–13-0.0211%2 May
anubis13–11-0.0213%2 May
dust210–13-0.0312%2 May
dust216–14-0.0017%2 May
ancient13–80.0713%2 May
dust26–13-0.0724%2 May
inferno7–13-0.0014%1 May
ancient3–130.037%1 May
anubis16–13-0.019%1 May
dust29–13-0.0713%1 May
dust213–60.0134%1 May
dust212–12-0.0414%1 May
dust212–12-0.0117%1 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →