JukeNukem

JukeNukem — CS2 Stats

FI76561197988557300[U:1:28291572]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,704Tracked matches53%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,448Top 50% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#71400 of 238109 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,421 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 14 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,448 -1,494 15 Aug21 Sept · 24 days played
20,00022,841peak 22,84115 Aug21 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,421 +0 28 Aug19 Sept · 6 observations
1,4211,421peak 1,42128 Aug19 Sept
22,841Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,421Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-08-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,421
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 110 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,393 below peak (22,841)
  • -901 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,552 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJukeNukemFACEITLevel 8 · 1,421 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,448 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,421csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning65
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46513Last 10046%Win rateWLWWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility6.1
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch1.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning6.5
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time557ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 548ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy15.5%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–10 · anubis, 20 Aug
35%Best headshot accuracy · 9–6 · inferno, 1 Sept
391msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · cache, 8 Sept
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 21 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 55% over 11dust2Weakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB25131252%0.01
infernoC167944%-0.01
cacheB158753%0.01
anubisA116555%0.02
dust2C114736%-0.02
ancientC104640%-0.00
mirageC83538%-0.02
office41325%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

459Matches
49%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
84.0ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke8756%1.2017.1
Inferno6748%1.0717.1
Anubis4556%1.1616.8
Ancient3429%1.2016.7
Dust22744%1.1217.6
Mirage2138%1.0115.4
Overpass1540%1.0616.3
Cache1560%1.1717.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
83.1%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
537msReaction time
56.0%T opening success
42.9%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
9.9%Flash assists
11.36HE damage / grenade
7.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–50.029%21 Sept
cache14–16-0.0412%21 Sept
nuke13–10.1817%21 Sept
inferno13–30.1022%21 Sept
nuke11–130.0320%20 Sept
cache13–20.0414%20 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0312%20 Sept
nuke12–16-0.0317%19 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0716%19 Sept
nuke13–100.0115%19 Sept
inferno13–60.0714%19 Sept
nuke9–130.0317%17 Sept
dust216–130.0411%17 Sept
nuke13–110.0413%16 Sept
cache13–100.1218%14 Sept
mirage9–13-0.068%12 Sept
cache13–30.0314%12 Sept
mirage10–130.0216%11 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0621%11 Sept
ancient5–130.0010%11 Sept
inferno13–40.0514%11 Sept
anubis19–170.0316%10 Sept
nuke13–20.0123%10 Sept
dust27–13-0.0421%10 Sept
anubis11–130.019%9 Sept
cache9–130.0121%8 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0119%8 Sept
cache13–50.0119%8 Sept
inferno14–160.0513%7 Sept
mirage13–30.0116%7 Sept
dust27–13-0.0225%7 Sept
dust27–13-0.099%5 Sept
ancient12–16-0.0310%5 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0413%5 Sept
anubis13–50.0424%5 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0222%5 Sept
dust213–7-0.0326%5 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0312%5 Sept
cache2–13-0.0812%5 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0826%5 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0317%5 Sept
mirage1–9-0.120%4 Sept
ancient13–100.0315%4 Sept
cache13–90.0723%4 Sept
anubis13–50.0217%4 Sept
nuke4–130.0016%4 Sept
nuke13–50.0518%3 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0317%3 Sept
ancient10–13-0.029%3 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0116%2 Sept
nuke14–16-0.0117%2 Sept
office13–90.1621%2 Sept
office12–12-0.0815%2 Sept
nuke13–11-0.016%1 Sept
inferno13–60.1114%1 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0113%1 Sept
inferno9–60.0235%1 Sept
anubis13–80.0314%31 Aug
dust213–30.0219%31 Aug
inferno0–9-0.2430%31 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0913%30 Aug
ancient13–30.0119%30 Aug
nuke13–7-0.058%29 Aug
dust210–13-0.0011%28 Aug
cache5–130.0725%28 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0718%28 Aug
ancient8–130.018%28 Aug
ancient8–130.0010%28 Aug
cache13–2-0.0317%28 Aug
nuke19–150.0323%27 Aug
cache12–120.0716%26 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0424%26 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0120%25 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0615%25 Aug
cache13–110.0114%25 Aug
dust213–50.1114%25 Aug
dust22–13-0.124%21 Aug
ancient13–90.0019%21 Aug
cache13–8-0.0817%20 Aug
nuke10–130.0216%20 Aug
anubis13–100.2017%20 Aug
nuke13–90.0214%20 Aug
mirage13–60.0312%20 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0014%20 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0310%20 Aug
nuke1–60.0014%20 Aug
dust210–13-0.0234%19 Aug
inferno13–8-0.066%19 Aug
office7–130.0216%15 Aug
cache7–13-0.0214%15 Aug
nuke13–80.079%15 Aug
dust217–19-0.0613%15 Aug
cache9–130.0211%15 Aug
nuke13–100.0911%15 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0015%14 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0323%14 Aug
office3–13-0.0414%14 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0733%14 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0322%14 Aug
ancient7–130.0320%14 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →