bayf

bayf — CS2 Stats

76561197988482387[U:1:28216659]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

699Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,160 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (41 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,160 → 2,160
+2Tracked matches · now 699
0.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 50.0%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,160 +0 30 Aug – 21 Sept · 3 observations
2,1602,160peak 2,16030 Aug21 Sept
2,160Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
63Days played since 2024-11-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,160
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 340 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbayfFACEITLevel 10 · 2,160 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,160csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning63
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY63–37Last 10063%Win rateWLLWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +6.9pp headshot accuracy · −42ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility5.6
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning6.3
Utility5.6
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time607ms+37ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 20 Jan →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · inferno, 9 Nov →
359msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · anubis, 18 Jan →
13–3Biggest win · dust2, 23 Jan →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
19–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
18Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 23mirageWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2316–770%0.03
dust2S2114–767%0.01
infernoA1610–663%0.01
mirageC125–742%-0.00
trainA117–464%0.00
anubisS96–367%0.01
overpass—42–250%0.01
ancient—21–150%0.06
cache—22–0100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,092Matches
57%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
78.4ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust214661%1.1716.4
Mirage10453%1.0115.0
Nuke10053%1.1716.2
Inferno9166%1.1716.8
Anubis4760%1.1016.3
Ancient4154%0.9415.2
Train2952%0.9915.0
Cache2060%1.1914.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.7%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
605msReaction time
35.5%T opening success
51.9%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
8.71HE damage / grenade
6.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.5314% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–60.0921%9 Jun →
ancient11–130.0324%31 May →
mirage11–13-0.0125%26 May →
cache13–100.0836%16 May →
dust26–130.0320%7 May →
cache13–80.0926%3 May →
overpass11–130.0314%17 Apr →
nuke13–80.1125%6 Apr →
nuke13–110.0231%2 Apr →
nuke8–13-0.0621%24 Mar →
overpass22–200.0218%24 Mar →
nuke16–140.0417%8 Mar →
overpass13–10-0.0412%23 Feb →
nuke16–140.0423%13 Feb →
dust213–90.0121%12 Feb →
inferno13–110.0626%5 Feb →
nuke13–70.0111%31 Jan →
nuke9–130.0111%26 Jan →
dust23–13-0.0714%25 Jan →
anubis13–7-0.0321%24 Jan →
train8–13-0.009%18 Jan →
train8–13-0.0412%10 Jan →
nuke5–13-0.0523%10 Jan →
inferno10–13-0.1013%3 Jan →
overpass9–130.0325%21 Dec →
nuke13–8-0.0139%21 Dec →
dust214–16-0.0426%21 Dec →
inferno11–130.0428%1 Dec →
mirage13–110.0114%3 Mar →
dust210–130.0119%3 Mar →
train16–140.0118%2 Mar →
nuke19–170.0212%2 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0221%1 Mar →
inferno16–140.0716%27 Feb →
anubis14–160.0318%25 Feb →
anubis13–11-0.0325%25 Feb →
nuke13–40.0824%25 Feb →
train13–90.0419%25 Feb →
dust213–10-0.0013%25 Feb →
train13–90.0214%24 Feb →
nuke13–11-0.0224%22 Feb →
inferno13–110.0327%21 Feb →
dust216–13-0.0313%21 Feb →
nuke13–110.0319%17 Feb →
inferno13–6-0.0219%17 Feb →
dust214–16-0.0023%17 Feb →
nuke13–50.0628%17 Feb →
nuke4–130.0118%10 Feb →
nuke13–40.0115%10 Feb →
train13–100.0325%9 Feb →
dust213–8-0.0228%8 Feb →
mirage16–14-0.0014%8 Feb →
train8–13-0.0321%8 Feb →
inferno13–10-0.0113%7 Feb →
ancient13–60.0920%6 Feb →
train13–6-0.0321%6 Feb →
inferno13–70.0414%4 Feb →
dust213–10-0.0216%4 Feb →
nuke11–130.0119%4 Feb →
train13–100.0227%2 Feb →
dust213–9-0.0116%2 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0329%30 Jan →
train13–110.0422%30 Jan →
nuke10–130.0527%25 Jan →
dust213–90.0115%25 Jan →
nuke5–13-0.0519%24 Jan →
nuke13–90.0819%23 Jan →
dust213–30.0315%23 Jan →
mirage14–16-0.0219%20 Jan →
dust213–30.1520%20 Jan →
anubis13–60.0136%20 Jan →
dust213–3-0.0019%20 Jan →
anubis11–13-0.0420%18 Jan →
nuke19–170.0619%17 Jan →
inferno7–13-0.0221%11 Jan →
mirage13–8-0.0320%6 Jan →
mirage6–13-0.0118%4 Jan →
inferno13–30.1022%4 Jan →
dust213–70.0216%4 Jan →
mirage7–130.0428%4 Jan →
dust213–90.0425%1 Jan →
anubis13–100.0427%31 Dec →
inferno13–80.0421%31 Dec →
dust213–70.0917%31 Dec →
mirage7–13-0.0221%29 Dec →
train5–13-0.0315%29 Dec →
inferno11–13-0.0133%22 Dec →
inferno13–16-0.0013%20 Dec →
anubis13–30.0619%19 Dec →
mirage13–11-0.0214%19 Dec →
inferno13–7-0.0420%17 Dec →
anubis13–110.0426%8 Dec →
mirage17–19-0.0324%8 Dec →
inferno13–60.0545%9 Nov →
anubis10–13-0.0032%9 Nov →
inferno9–13-0.0216%6 Nov →
mirage13–100.0531%4 Nov →
dust216–13-0.0128%3 Nov →
nuke16–140.0431%3 Nov →
mirage13–16-0.0123%2 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO500 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.