Nox — CS2 Stats

76561197987966160[U:1:27700432]✓ No bans

1,798Tracked matches43%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,364Purple band · top ~27% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23474 of 39156 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNoxPREMIER15,364 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning39
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43552Last 10043%Win rateWLWLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.0
Aggression3.3
Utility5.4
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning3.9
Utility5.4
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time578ms−76ms
first ⅓ avg 654ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 13.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — cache 13–3
131Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
410In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 9mirageWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2491538%-0.02
infernoC2291341%-0.00
cacheC1871139%-0.01
anubisB115645%-0.01
ancientS96367%-0.01
mirageD93633%-0.01
nuke41325%-0.04
overpass330100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

383Matches
52%Win rate
0.77Avg K/D
61.5ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno10358%0.7711.5
Dust29551%0.7411.0
Anubis6545%0.7411.4
Nuke3247%0.7511.9
Ancient2646%0.8911.4
Mirage1856%0.8111.7
Overpass1656%0.8112.6
Train1457%0.8412.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
69.9%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
577msReaction time
33.1%T opening success
26.9%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
8.29HE damage / grenade
7.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.0784% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–30.0113%29 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0611%28 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0220%28 Aug
cache11–13-0.0414%28 Aug
ancient8–130.0211%27 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0321%27 Aug
inferno3–13-0.096%26 Aug
inferno13–100.0317%25 Aug
inferno5–130.0727%25 Aug
dust213–80.0218%25 Aug
inferno10–130.0231%25 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0225%25 Aug
cache13–30.137%25 Aug
inferno2–13-0.088%24 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0213%24 Aug
cache13–10.0111%24 Aug
mirage13–70.1014%24 Aug
inferno8–13-0.1025%24 Aug
inferno10–130.0314%24 Aug
dust26–13-0.0515%24 Aug
anubis13–50.0223%23 Aug
dust213–10-0.0512%23 Aug
inferno7–13-0.059%23 Aug
dust213–16-0.0342%23 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0013%22 Aug
mirage13–40.0421%22 Aug
dust24–13-0.0815%22 Aug
cache7–13-0.0516%22 Aug
dust29–13-0.0128%22 Aug
dust213–3-0.038%22 Aug
dust213–70.0910%22 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0213%21 Aug
inferno13–50.096%18 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0120%18 Aug
anubis13–60.1016%18 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0415%14 Aug
cache7–13-0.0721%14 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0217%14 Aug
anubis4–13-0.047%14 Aug
inferno13–100.0112%14 Aug
dust216–14-0.0313%13 Aug
ancient13–30.014%13 Aug
nuke11–130.0512%13 Aug
cache13–9-0.0319%13 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0915%13 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0315%13 Aug
dust24–13-0.0520%13 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0211%12 Aug
dust26–130.0113%12 Aug
ancient16–120.0724%12 Aug
dust22–8-0.0014%12 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0124%11 Aug
inferno13–50.0220%11 Aug
dust211–13-0.0412%11 Aug
anubis13–10.0918%11 Aug
dust213–11-0.0114%11 Aug
cache6–13-0.0714%10 Aug
inferno8–130.0128%10 Aug
mirage11–130.0010%9 Aug
dust26–13-0.0316%9 Aug
dust213–5-0.0120%8 Aug
inferno12–00.0827%8 Aug
inferno13–40.0718%8 Aug
dust213–20.0318%7 Aug
dust25–130.1022%6 Aug
cache13–80.0711%6 Aug
cache13–50.0612%6 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0410%6 Aug
cache11–13-0.027%5 Aug
cache2–13-0.0318%5 Aug
cache11–13-0.0616%4 Aug
cache10–13-0.0518%2 Aug
cache10–13-0.0518%2 Aug
cache11–130.0629%2 Aug
cache1–13-0.0920%2 Aug
cache12–7-0.0115%13 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0013%5 Jul
mirage13–90.0224%28 Jun
ancient13–6-0.018%19 Jun
anubis15–15-0.0315%19 Jun
dust211–13-0.0115%18 Jun
inferno15–150.0110%14 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0912%14 Mar
inferno13–10-0.020%14 Mar
nuke16–12-0.0416%14 Mar
overpass19–15-0.048%13 Mar
nuke17–19-0.088%13 Mar
overpass13–70.047%12 Mar
dust23–13-0.0816%11 Mar
overpass13–9-0.0811%11 Mar
inferno6–13-0.087%11 Mar
nuke14–16-0.109%11 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0529%9 Mar
dust28–13-0.0910%9 Mar
anubis10–13-0.118%9 Mar
dust27–130.0327%9 Mar
mirage3–13-0.067%9 Mar
dust29–13-0.0612%9 Mar
dust213–11-0.0015%8 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0510%7 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →