fent enjoyer

fent enjoyer — CS2 Stats

76561197987003601[U:1:26737873]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,577Tracked matches68%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating29,299Top 1% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~0.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1165 of 259061 tracked
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 29,299 +4,300 29 Aug – 26 Oct · 21 days played
24,99929,537peak 29,53729 Aug26 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,234 +0 29 Aug – 23 Sept · 3 observations
2,2342,234peak 2,23429 Aug23 Sept
29,537Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,234Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,234
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 266 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 238 below peak (29,537)
  • +1,509 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 701 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-23
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfent enjoyerPREMIER29,299 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,234csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning61
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–32–10Last 10058%Win rateLWWWWLLLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · +22ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 486ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 483ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 472ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.5
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 57% on T to 42% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.1
Utility6.5
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time474ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 515ms → last ⅓ avg 474ms
Headshot accuracy21.5%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–1 · ancient, 14 Sept →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 8–1 · cache, 27 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · vertigo, 14 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 4 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

12Longest win streak
2–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 78% over 23nukeWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheS2318–578%0.01
infernoC219–1243%-0.00
mirageB158–753%0.01
ancientS128–467%0.03
dust2A127–558%0.03
nukeC83–538%0.01
anubisA53–260%-0.00
vertigo—21–150%0.00
rush_001—11–0100%-0.08
train—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

530Matches
55%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
78.0ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno3266%1.0915.1
Nuke3171%1.1515.1
Ancient1867%1.0315.1
Anubis1457%1.1517.2
Train1457%1.1817.1
Overpass1155%1.1915.3
Dust21136%0.7713.0
Vertigo333%0.9913.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
81.2%Counter-strafing
7.5°Preaim
468msReaction time
57.1%T opening success
41.7%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
10.6%Flash assists
10.25HE damage / grenade
8.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–13-0.0217%31 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0119%31 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0431%30 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0123%30 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.1013%30 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0219%26 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0121%26 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0219%26 Oct →
mirage11–130.0422%26 Oct →
dust212–12-0.090%25 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0714%25 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0314%25 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0429%25 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0122%24 Oct →
cache2–13-0.026%24 Oct →
cache13–70.0533%23 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0324%23 Oct →
cache13–70.0322%19 Oct →
ancient13–100.0020%19 Oct →
inferno13–80.0118%19 Oct →
dust213–70.0328%19 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0812%18 Oct →
vertigo13–20.0223%14 Oct →
cache13–100.0423%13 Oct →
dust213–60.0320%12 Oct →
anubis13–30.0538%12 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0025%11 Oct →
mirage12–120.0324%11 Oct →
cache13–10.0033%11 Oct →
mirage13–30.0827%11 Oct →
cache13–20.0630%11 Oct →
cache5–0-0.0317%11 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0023%11 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0117%10 Oct →
dust213–60.0415%10 Oct →
inferno8–10.0732%10 Oct →
mirage13–10.0811%10 Oct →
cache13–90.1129%10 Oct →
anubis12–160.009%10 Oct →
ancient13–90.0933%8 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0418%8 Oct →
dust26–130.0531%5 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0415%4 Oct →
mirage13–00.1318%4 Oct →
cache13–40.017%4 Oct →
mirage13–40.0320%4 Oct →
ancient13–60.0524%3 Oct →
cache13–80.1119%3 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0227%1 Oct →
rush_0018–5-0.0836%1 Oct →
inferno8–130.026%29 Sept →
nuke6–130.0215%28 Sept →
ancient13–70.0425%28 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0424%28 Sept →
cache8–1-0.0247%27 Sept →
train12–12-0.0218%27 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0411%27 Sept →
anubis0–7-0.0620%27 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0324%26 Sept →
dust213–90.0323%24 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0119%24 Sept →
mirage13–00.0619%24 Sept →
dust25–00.1416%24 Sept →
cache3–130.0214%23 Sept →
ancient11–130.0714%23 Sept →
dust27–130.1025%22 Sept →
cache12–16-0.0118%20 Sept →
cache13–110.0130%20 Sept →
nuke13–100.0022%20 Sept →
dust213–10.0921%19 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0120%18 Sept →
inferno13–90.1522%18 Sept →
cache13–70.0214%17 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.047%17 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0222%17 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0415%16 Sept →
ancient13–50.1436%16 Sept →
cache13–100.0210%16 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0128%14 Sept →
ancient13–10.2225%14 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0120%14 Sept →
inferno13–90.0121%13 Sept →
inferno13–100.0317%9 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0717%7 Sept →
ancient12–12-0.0523%7 Sept →
vertigo8–13-0.0213%7 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0222%7 Sept →
ancient13–50.0126%7 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0122%7 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0121%7 Sept →
nuke8–130.0233%4 Sept →
cache12–120.0115%4 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0614%3 Sept →
nuke13–110.0811%29 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0413%29 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0819%29 Aug →
cache13–70.0417%29 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0221%29 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0126%28 Aug →
anubis13–70.0224%28 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches12-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.