GlyN — CS2 Stats

76561197997396730[U:1:37131002]1 game ban

4,700Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,577Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2579 of 22600 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,674 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86

Positioning50

Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–36–6Last 10058%Win rateLWLWWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6

Aggression7.2

Utility7.4

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels2.9

Clutch6.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6

Positioning5.0

Utility7.4

Mechanics6.9

Opening Duels3.0

Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time512ms−48ms

first ⅓ avg 560ms → last ⅓ avg 512ms

Headshot accuracy23.6%+3.8%

first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 23.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — cache 13–3

13–0Biggest win — mirage

9Longest win streak

4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 68% over 19dust2Weakest map · 45% over 29

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	29	13–16	45%	0.02
mirage	A	22	13–9	59%	0.03
cache	S	20	13–7	65%	0.05
inferno	S	19	13–6	68%	0.06
anubis	—	4	1–3	25%	0.04
ancient	—	3	3–0	100%	-0.00
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
nuke	—	1	1–0	100%	0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 29). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

929Matches

63%Win rate

1.53Avg K/D

88.2ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

12%1v2 clutch win

13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	60	60%	1.38	18.0
Mirage	54	46%	1.19	18.7
Inferno	48	75%	1.48	18.5
Ancient	46	63%	1.32	18.9
Nuke	26	58%	1.39	17.3
Overpass	18	72%	1.43	20.1
Dust2	14	21%	1.07	16.9
Vertigo	7	57%	1.00	16.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.0%Headshot accuracy

37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.4%Spray accuracy

81.3%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

521msReaction time

29.9%T opening success

53.7%CT opening success

0.63Enemies flashed / flash

9.7%Flash assists

14.83HE damage / grenade

10.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.9241% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 29 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	1–9	-0.05	23%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.08	33%	28 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.03	33%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.08	23%	28 Aug →
inferno	9–3	0.19	15%	27 Aug →
inferno	9–2	0.08	28%	27 Aug →
inferno	6–9	-0.03	21%	27 Aug →
inferno	9–1	0.03	8%	27 Aug →
inferno	9–5	0.15	14%	27 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	16%	27 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.07	23%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–0	0.07	22%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.04	17%	26 Aug →
ancient	16–13	-0.02	21%	26 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.01	28%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.01	23%	26 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	15%	26 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.04	34%	26 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	32%	25 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	23%	24 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.01	29%	24 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.07	30%	24 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.07	16%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.04	25%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.04	20%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.12	18%	22 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	33%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.04	26%	16 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	29%	16 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	35%	16 Aug →
cache	13–0	0.09	30%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.02	14%	15 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	23%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.06	20%	15 Aug →
anubis	4–3	0.06	40%	10 Aug →
overpass	9–13	0.03	11%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	20%	9 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.05	20%	9 Aug →
mirage	6–4	-0.02	14%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.05	32%	9 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	29%	9 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.05	30%	7 Aug →
inferno	12–12	0.09	29%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.10	23%	5 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.07	29%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.04	26%	2 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.00	29%	2 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.00	26%	2 Aug →
anubis	9–12	-0.02	16%	1 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.04	19%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.15	26%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.04	16%	31 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.06	23%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.03	21%	30 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.19	21%	30 Jul →
mirage	11–2	0.16	44%	30 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.02	11%	27 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.04	10%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.02	24%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.01	19%	26 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.09	16%	26 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.06	10%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.18	20%	26 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.01	26%	26 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.06	19%	26 Jul →
dust2	2–13	0.06	37%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	31%	26 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.09	29%	24 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.00	14%	24 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.04	0%	24 Jul →
inferno	3–13	0.04	33%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.13	18%	20 Jul →
overpass	13–8	-0.01	14%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	19%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.05	21%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.01	26%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.13	17%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.14	26%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–0	0.00	0%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.10	33%	19 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.04	19%	18 Jul →
cache	0–13	-0.00	0%	18 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.05	33%	18 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.07	29%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.06	11%	17 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.06	17%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.11	16%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	12%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.06	19%	12 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.04	18%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.01	26%	6 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.06	18%	5 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.08	32%	5 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	19%	4 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.02	16%	3 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	27%	3 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.07	29%	2 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.01	23%	2 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.13	18%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	20%	2 Jul →