✪tast — CS2 Stats

SE76561197986686243[U:1:26420515]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,659Tracked matches44%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport

CSDB Leaderboard#116965 of 259978 tracked

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,662 -660 13 Apr – 24 May · 14 days played

18,322Peak Premier in tracked matches

2,352Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

38Days played since 2026-04-11

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,352
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 148 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning53

Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–46–3Last 10051%Win rateWLLLTWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −6.2pp headshot accuracy · −25ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

1–3–1 · 20% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 23%
Avg reaction 670ms

Last 10

3–6–1 · 30% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 30%
Avg reaction 645ms

Last 20

9–10–1 · 45% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 33%
Avg reaction 658ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.7

Utility7.1

Positioning5.3

Opening Duels4.8

Clutch3.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 656ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning5.3

Utility7.1

Mechanics8.1

Opening Duels3.9

Win Impact3.1

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time653ms−32ms

first ⅓ avg 685ms → last ⅓ avg 653ms

Headshot accuracy36.7%+9.7%

first ⅓ avg 27.0% → last ⅓ avg 36.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 16 May →

70%Best headshot accuracy · 4–8 · mirage, 26 Apr →

422msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · mirage, 18 May →

13–1Biggest win · dust2, 11 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cache_bBest map · 75% over 8mirageWeakest map · 33% over 30

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	31	16–15	52%	0.04
mirage	D	30	10–20	33%	0.02
anubis	S	11	8–3	73%	0.07
inferno	A	11	7–4	64%	0.05
cache_b	S	8	6–2	75%	0.04
cache	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.00
nuke	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.04
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
ancient	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 30). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,993Matches

51%Win rate

1.16Avg K/D

86.6ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	560	51%	1.08	17.5
Inferno	295	55%	1.17	18.0
Anubis	150	41%	1.08	17.1
Overpass	85	52%	1.02	16.9
Dust2	68	56%	0.90	15.5
Ancient	67	40%	1.00	16.8
Vertigo	53	45%	1.05	17.6
Cache	26	58%	1.07	16.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

35.3%Headshot accuracy

34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.0%Spray accuracy

86.4%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

656msReaction time

39.7%T opening success

51.1%CT opening success

0.67Enemies flashed / flash

17.6%Flash assists

12.42HE damage / grenade

11.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.7049% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 30 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	13–7	0.07	19%	2 Oct →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	15%	21 Sept →
mirage	2–13	-0.10	17%	29 Aug →
inferno	24–28	-0.04	26%	8 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.01	37%	31 May →
inferno	13–11	0.08	56%	31 May →
nuke	3–13	0.01	20%	24 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	27%	24 May →
inferno	10–9	-0.01	33%	23 May →
dust2	13–9	0.10	49%	23 May →
dust2	7–13	0.10	12%	23 May →
dust2	13–4	0.05	36%	22 May →
dust2	13–9	0.08	41%	22 May →
ancient	13–10	0.03	31%	20 May →
dust2	13–5	-0.03	50%	19 May →
dust2	3–13	-0.08	40%	19 May →
mirage	7–13	0.08	53%	18 May →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	23%	18 May →
dust2	4–13	0.05	36%	16 May →
dust2	13–3	0.21	41%	16 May →
inferno	13–5	0.13	51%	16 May →
mirage	13–4	0.15	46%	16 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	47%	16 May →
cache	2–13	-0.01	38%	14 May →
mirage	12–12	0.06	52%	14 May →
dust2	3–13	-0.01	31%	14 May →
mirage	13–8	0.11	40%	12 May →
dust2	12–12	0.12	26%	12 May →
mirage	8–13	0.04	46%	11 May →
dust2	11–13	0.03	25%	11 May →
dust2	8–13	0.04	53%	11 May →
dust2	13–1	0.13	50%	11 May →
mirage	10–13	0.03	44%	11 May →
cache	7–13	-0.02	21%	11 May →
cache	13–7	0.03	23%	5 May →
mirage	20–22	0.01	21%	5 May →
mirage	13–11	0.03	29%	4 May →
anubis	13–3	0.05	24%	2 May →
inferno	13–2	0.04	23%	1 May →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	30%	1 May →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	19%	1 May →
anubis	10–0	0.12	7%	1 May →
inferno	13–9	0.05	36%	30 Apr →
inferno	10–13	0.13	39%	28 Apr →
mirage	6–13	0.02	41%	27 Apr →
dust2	13–4	0.01	23%	27 Apr →
inferno	13–6	0.03	33%	27 Apr →
inferno	13–10	0.12	26%	26 Apr →
mirage	4–8	-0.04	70%	26 Apr →
overpass	4–13	-0.04	40%	25 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.07	26%	24 Apr →
mirage	10–13	0.06	63%	24 Apr →
anubis	13–9	0.00	21%	24 Apr →
mirage	10–13	0.05	25%	23 Apr →
inferno	13–11	0.01	46%	23 Apr →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	37%	22 Apr →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	44%	22 Apr →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	23%	21 Apr →
overpass	13–11	0.06	26%	21 Apr →
cache_b	13–9	0.02	29%	21 Apr →
mirage	8–13	0.00	14%	21 Apr →
anubis	13–11	0.02	25%	20 Apr →
dust2	3–13	-0.07	29%	19 Apr →
cache_b	13–10	0.08	35%	19 Apr →
anubis	13–7	0.13	57%	19 Apr →
dust2	19–16	0.05	38%	18 Apr →
mirage	13–6	0.10	37%	18 Apr →
dust2	13–10	0.04	40%	18 Apr →
mirage	13–5	0.00	30%	18 Apr →
cache_b	5–13	0.03	35%	17 Apr →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	27%	17 Apr →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	19%	17 Apr →
mirage	13–16	0.06	22%	16 Apr →
dust2	16–13	0.01	25%	16 Apr →
cache_b	13–4	0.09	39%	15 Apr →
cache_b	13–7	0.05	26%	15 Apr →
mirage	13–5	0.07	39%	15 Apr →
mirage	10–13	0.06	30%	15 Apr →
anubis	14–16	0.03	23%	14 Apr →
mirage	2–13	0.00	26%	14 Apr →
cache_b	16–14	0.06	24%	14 Apr →
dust2	8–13	0.02	13%	14 Apr →
dust2	13–5	0.10	33%	14 Apr →
vertigo	6–13	0.01	46%	14 Apr →
anubis	13–6	0.10	28%	14 Apr →
inferno	11–13	0.04	27%	14 Apr →
nuke	13–6	-0.09	38%	13 Apr →
anubis	13–3	0.17	19%	13 Apr →
dust2	16–14	0.05	18%	12 Apr →
dust2	13–6	0.00	21%	12 Apr →
cache_b	13–11	-0.01	19%	12 Apr →
dust2	13–5	0.12	24%	12 Apr →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	27%	12 Apr →
dust2	13–5	0.07	23%	12 Apr →
anubis	10–13	0.06	18%	12 Apr →
mirage	13–8	0.03	24%	12 Apr →
cache_b	8–13	-0.01	35%	11 Apr →
mirage	11–13	0.01	14%	11 Apr →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	23%	11 Apr →
dust2	13–6	0.07	34%	11 Apr →