AukustiE

AukustiE — CS2 Stats

FI76561197983928123[U:1:23662395]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,337Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating17,572Purple band · top ~18.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,729 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−540Premier CS Rating · 18,112 → 17,572
0Faceit ELO · 1,729 → 1,729
+10Tracked matches · now 1,337
−16.7ppWin rate · 53.3% → 36.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 15 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,572 -2,427 15 Sept20 Sept · 3 days played
17,57219,999peak 19,99915 Sept20 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,729 +0 30 Aug19 Sept · 4 observations
1,7291,729peak 1,72930 Aug19 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,729Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-03-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,729
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 22 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,427 below peak (19,999)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,428 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-19
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAukustiEFACEITLevel 7 · 1,729 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER17,572 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,729csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning47
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44542Last 10044%Win rateWLLLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · −11ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 457ms

Last 10

  • 19 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 475ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 481ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility6.4
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 48% on T to 22% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning4.7
Utility6.4
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact0.6

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time502ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 571ms → last ⅓ avg 502ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 22 Mar
29%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · dust2, 24 Mar
391msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · dust2, 15 Sept
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 7 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
411In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 65% over 17mirageWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC1981142%0.03
anubisB189950%0.02
nukeS1711665%0.02
cacheC156940%0.00
dust2D124833%-0.02
infernoC114736%0.03
mirageD51420%0.00
overpass21150%0.01
vertigo1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,899Matches
50%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
82.7ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient15454%1.2517.6
Nuke13053%1.1116.4
Anubis11156%1.1817.1
Dust26648%1.0415.5
Inferno5834%1.0615.8
Mirage4531%0.9516.2
Vertigo2255%1.3020.5
Train1932%1.1116.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
49.3%Spray accuracy
85.6%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
496msReaction time
48.3%T opening success
22.1%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
8.02HE damage / grenade
13.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 22.103% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–50.0614%20 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0317%20 Sept
cache6–13-0.0312%20 Sept
inferno3–130.0719%19 Sept
anubis8–130.0419%19 Sept
dust28–13-0.0818%19 Sept
cache5–13-0.0218%19 Sept
dust22–13-0.0621%19 Sept
ancient11–130.0416%19 Sept
dust29–130.0023%19 Sept
ancient13–90.0121%15 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0412%15 Sept
cache13–70.0118%15 Sept
cache9–130.0128%15 Sept
nuke13–5-0.0113%15 Sept
nuke13–30.0916%15 Sept
dust213–90.0615%15 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0315%15 Sept
cache11–13-0.0514%15 Sept
nuke13–80.0621%15 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0411%14 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0618%14 Sept
dust213–30.0119%14 Sept
cache13–20.0918%14 Sept
dust24–13-0.0212%14 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0111%14 Sept
anubis7–13-0.048%14 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0210%14 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0013%13 Sept
cache13–11-0.029%13 Sept
anubis13–30.119%13 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0115%12 Sept
cache12–160.0115%12 Sept
nuke13–110.0515%12 Sept
cache13–100.029%12 Sept
mirage13–30.0710%12 Sept
cache11–130.0014%12 Sept
mirage10–130.0519%9 Sept
ancient13–50.0810%2 Sept
dust26–13-0.0615%2 Sept
dust213–6-0.0710%1 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0710%1 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0211%1 Sept
dust213–9-0.0418%1 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0218%23 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0018%20 Aug
nuke11–130.0020%20 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0512%20 Aug
ancient7–130.0718%20 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0315%20 Aug
nuke13–40.026%4 Aug
ancient11–130.1026%4 Aug
ancient16–120.0916%4 Aug
ancient11–130.0117%15 Jul
cache11–13-0.0020%15 Jul
nuke19–160.0521%14 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0210%14 Jul
ancient6–130.0614%12 Jul
ancient13–30.0719%12 Jul
cache12–12-0.0411%12 Jul
cache13–10-0.036%28 May
nuke9–30.1222%28 May
vertigo7–9-0.0621%28 May
cache13–50.0321%3 May
cache5–130.0421%3 May
anubis11–130.0417%19 Apr
ancient16–13-0.0318%19 Apr
inferno13–100.0113%14 Apr
nuke10–130.0015%14 Apr
anubis13–80.0814%14 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0320%9 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0523%9 Apr
anubis16–120.0615%7 Apr
inferno13–10.1215%7 Apr
inferno13–110.0720%7 Apr
overpass13–70.0519%5 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0217%5 Apr
inferno13–160.0517%5 Apr
anubis13–60.059%2 Apr
overpass7–13-0.0223%2 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0211%2 Apr
anubis16–130.0613%31 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0615%31 Mar
anubis13–40.1022%31 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0311%29 Mar
anubis15–15-0.0212%26 Mar
dust26–13-0.0319%26 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0413%24 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0316%24 Mar
dust210–130.0229%24 Mar
inferno13–60.1310%22 Mar
nuke13–20.1324%22 Mar
anubis5–130.0222%22 Mar
anubis16–140.0214%19 Mar
ancient13–90.1211%19 Mar
ancient9–130.0518%17 Mar
dust25–130.0124%17 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0521%17 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0310%15 Mar
anubis13–100.0420%15 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →