Tronald Dumb

Tronald Dumb — CS2 Stats

DE76561197983054696[U:1:22788968]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,334Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating17,688Purple band · top ~17.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,466 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Oct 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,688 -384 1 Jun – 22 Oct · 27 days played
16,86518,967peak 18,9671 Jun22 Oct
19,326Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,466Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-06-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,466
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 65 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,279 below peak (18,967)
  • -136 over 30 days · steady
  • -792 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,312 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTronald DumbFACEITLevel 7 · 1,466 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER17,688 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,466csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning46
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–43–7Last 10050%Win rateWLWTLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −5.9pp headshot accuracy · −14ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility7.0
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch3.8

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 55% on T to 28% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 657ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.6
Utility7.0
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time647ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 716ms → last ⅓ avg 647ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–0 · dust2, 23 Jun →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · ancient, 14 Aug →
445msFastest reaction time · 15–15 · inferno, 19 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 23 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
15–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 6nukeWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2612–1446%-0.01
ancientB178–947%-0.02
infernoA159–660%-0.00
cacheB126–650%-0.01
nukeD124–833%0.00
mirageA74–357%-0.01
anubisS64–267%-0.00
overpass—33–0100%0.02
vertigo—10–10%-0.04
poseidon—10–10%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,428Matches
50%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
78.4ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient7260%1.0815.5
Dust26045%0.9615.3
Inferno5946%0.9815.0
Mirage2348%1.4816.6
Anubis2143%1.1218.2
Nuke1942%1.4316.7
Overpass1759%1.0315.1
Vertigo922%1.0414.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
77.9%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
657msReaction time
55.1%T opening success
27.8%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
16.3%Flash assists
10.05HE damage / grenade
12.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 27.7749% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass9–10.0713%22 Oct →
inferno1–9-0.2414%22 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0416%22 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.0324%19 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0113%19 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0312%19 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0323%19 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0021%11 Oct →
dust213–10.017%3 Oct →
cache7–13-0.098%3 Oct →
cache13–90.0537%16 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0420%16 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0216%16 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.039%16 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0719%12 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0532%7 Sept →
cache13–3-0.0021%7 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0419%3 Sept →
dust213–110.0225%3 Sept →
nuke5–90.0511%3 Sept →
vertigo8–8-0.0418%3 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0317%28 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.1012%28 Aug →
inferno13–70.0621%28 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0115%23 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0019%23 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0418%23 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0112%22 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0219%14 Aug →
ancient13–40.0137%14 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0923%14 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0616%14 Aug →
cache16–130.0224%10 Aug →
dust215–150.0224%10 Aug →
ancient10–130.0125%10 Aug →
cache15–150.0015%7 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0320%7 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.019%7 Aug →
nuke12–120.1015%7 Aug →
inferno13–110.1220%7 Aug →
cache13–100.0318%7 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0918%3 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0216%3 Aug →
nuke8–130.0119%29 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0528%29 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0521%29 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0212%29 Jul →
nuke13–60.0322%29 Jul →
dust215–150.0118%23 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0133%23 Jul →
dust213–100.0120%23 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0815%21 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0116%21 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.0633%21 Jul →
dust213–110.0120%21 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.093%15 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0315%15 Jul →
nuke13–110.0319%15 Jul →
inferno13–70.0912%15 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0131%15 Jul →
nuke13–110.0128%15 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.0313%15 Jul →
anubis13–70.0416%13 Jul →
anubis9–20.0213%13 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0326%12 Jul →
inferno13–40.1419%12 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0710%12 Jul →
mirage13–60.0121%12 Jul →
ancient11–130.0318%12 Jul →
ancient13–100.0516%10 Jul →
ancient14–160.0012%10 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0415%8 Jul →
overpass13–7-0.0716%5 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0710%5 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0721%5 Jul →
mirage13–50.0412%5 Jul →
anubis5–130.0429%5 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0724%5 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0426%30 Jun →
ancient16–13-0.0417%30 Jun →
dust213–16-0.0517%30 Jun →
dust213–40.0023%23 Jun →
dust213–00.1824%23 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.0113%23 Jun →
nuke9–13-0.0322%23 Jun →
dust214–160.0315%18 Jun →
overpass16–130.0715%18 Jun →
ancient13–90.0122%18 Jun →
ancient13–11-0.0215%14 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0426%14 Jun →
nuke15–150.0020%14 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0524%10 Jun →
anubis13–10-0.0217%10 Jun →
inferno13–20.0113%10 Jun →
poseidon2–9-0.1114%10 Jun →
dust213–110.0617%7 Jun →
mirage13–110.0024%7 Jun →
nuke13–160.0229%7 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0523%7 Jun →
nuke13–110.0222%1 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.