Plankt0n — CS2 Stats

76561197982206856[U:1:21941128]

1,725Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating16,789Purple band · top ~21.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8636 of 14520 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPlankt0nPREMIER16,789 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim49
Positioning50
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47512Last 10047%Win rateWWWWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim4.9
Aggression4.4
Utility7.1
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 634ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9
Positioning5.0
Utility7.1
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time633ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 633ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–4
131Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
W4Current streak
912In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B41212051%0.00
infernoC125742%0.00
nukeD113827%-0.02
ancientS119282%-0.01
anubisD113827%-0.03
mirageD71614%-0.02
cacheS65183%0.00
overpass1010%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

343Matches
50%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
73.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust210154%1.0814.9
Mirage5338%0.8413.2
Anubis4540%0.8512.4
Ancient3964%1.1314.9
Inferno3951%0.9912.6
Nuke3148%0.9214.9
Vertigo1155%0.9414.6
Cache1060%1.0014.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
29.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
25.9%Spray accuracy
80.4%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
634msReaction time
24.4%T opening success
45.0%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
11.97HE damage / grenade
16.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.3588% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust216–13-0.0311%27 Aug
inferno13–40.0723%27 Aug
dust213–80.0219%26 Aug
dust213–40.0121%25 Aug
dust211–130.0423%25 Aug
dust213–160.0317%24 Aug
nuke8–130.0422%23 Aug
ancient13–90.0116%23 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0019%23 Aug
dust26–13-0.0912%12 Aug
dust25–13-0.0217%12 Aug
dust27–130.0525%11 Aug
ancient13–60.0514%11 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0318%10 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0930%10 Aug
anubis4–130.0225%10 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0116%10 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0318%10 Aug
inferno15–150.0127%8 Aug
dust213–80.0317%8 Aug
inferno13–90.0215%7 Aug
dust213–160.0125%7 Aug
dust213–11-0.0615%7 Aug
dust213–80.0626%4 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0316%4 Aug
dust216–140.0221%3 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0316%3 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0329%31 Jul
dust213–30.0319%31 Jul
inferno10–13-0.043%31 Jul
dust25–13-0.0813%29 Jul
anubis3–13-0.1011%28 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0317%25 Jul
dust213–7-0.0120%25 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0212%25 Jul
dust215–15-0.0120%24 Jul
dust25–13-0.027%24 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0132%23 Jul
dust26–13-0.0418%23 Jul
inferno8–130.0014%23 Jul
dust29–13-0.0221%23 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0623%19 Jul
cache16–140.0212%19 Jul
inferno5–130.0023%16 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0413%16 Jul
anubis13–80.0225%10 Jul
dust213–80.0112%3 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0117%2 Jul
mirage0–3-0.0525%2 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0022%14 Jun
dust213–160.0324%10 Jun
inferno9–13-0.047%10 Jun
inferno14–16-0.0121%7 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0516%7 Jun
mirage17–190.0318%28 May
dust211–13-0.0131%28 May
dust213–110.0122%28 May
dust210–130.0124%27 May
inferno13–100.0421%27 May
dust213–6-0.0210%27 May
mirage4–13-0.0218%26 May
mirage9–13-0.0025%26 May
nuke13–9-0.0117%26 May
cache13–100.0922%26 May
overpass9–13-0.095%23 May
nuke11–13-0.0311%22 May
anubis8–13-0.0114%19 May
dust214–160.0120%18 May
dust213–100.0319%18 May
ancient13–80.0429%18 May
dust213–10.0019%18 May
dust213–8-0.0516%17 May
mirage9–13-0.0323%17 May
ancient4–13-0.0222%16 May
nuke13–7-0.0625%16 May
dust213–90.0027%16 May
cache19–17-0.0115%16 May
dust210–13-0.0524%15 May
dust211–130.0120%15 May
cache13–11-0.0128%14 May
dust213–40.1223%14 May
dust211–13-0.0219%14 May
nuke6–13-0.0523%13 May
ancient13–5-0.0511%13 May
dust210–130.0210%13 May
anubis6–13-0.0217%13 May
dust213–60.0720%13 May
anubis13–100.0322%12 May
cache7–13-0.0928%12 May
ancient13–70.0219%11 May
ancient13–11-0.0616%11 May
nuke9–13-0.0416%11 May
dust211–13-0.0415%7 May
dust213–11-0.0335%7 May
dust213–40.1324%7 May
cache13–90.0123%7 May
mirage13–16-0.0518%6 May
dust213–8-0.0319%6 May
inferno8–130.0222%6 May
anubis10–13-0.0511%6 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →