Plankt0n

Plankt0n — CS2 Stats

US76561197982206856[U:1:21941128]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,841Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,350Top 50% of 213,740 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#65619 of 260211 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,342 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Oct 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+31Faceit ELO · 1,311 → 1,342

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,350 +4,561 28 Aug – 22 Oct · 36 days played
16,52821,350peak 21,35028 Aug22 Oct
21,350Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,342Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,342
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 9 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,350
  • +2,019 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,650 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPlankt0nFACEITLevel 6 · 1,342 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER21,350 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,342csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning51
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–40–6Last 10054%Win rateWWWTWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–0–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 8–1–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 20

  • 13–6–1 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility7.0
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.1
Utility7.0
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time560ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 566ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 15–15 · dust2, 10 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · nuke, 16 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 16–13 · inferno, 25 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 6 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
11–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
18Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 8cacheWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3220–1263%0.01
infernoB179–853%-0.01
anubisB179–853%-0.01
ancientB157–847%-0.00
nukeS86–275%-0.01
cacheD61–517%0.00
mirageC52–340%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

355Matches
51%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
73.1ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust210655%1.0815.0
Mirage5739%0.8813.3
Anubis4641%0.8612.6
Inferno4154%1.0212.8
Ancient3964%1.1314.9
Nuke3148%0.9214.9
Vertigo1155%0.9414.6
Cache1060%1.0014.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.7%Spray accuracy
81.1%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
558msReaction time
46.5%T opening success
38.0%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
11.33HE damage / grenade
16.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.9755% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–8-0.0412%26 Oct →
dust213–60.1026%26 Oct →
inferno16–13-0.0121%25 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.0521%22 Oct →
ancient13–110.0122%22 Oct →
mirage13–100.0733%21 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0819%21 Oct →
dust213–100.0612%20 Oct →
ancient13–50.0114%20 Oct →
mirage8–130.0121%20 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0412%20 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.0515%19 Oct →
dust213–11-0.016%19 Oct →
mirage14–160.0524%19 Oct →
inferno9–130.0119%19 Oct →
nuke13–50.0518%18 Oct →
anubis16–130.0025%18 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0228%16 Oct →
anubis13–110.0120%16 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0023%16 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0214%16 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0520%16 Oct →
inferno13–50.0624%16 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0630%16 Oct →
anubis11–8-0.0313%15 Oct →
ancient12–16-0.0412%15 Oct →
anubis13–60.0216%15 Oct →
cache10–130.0522%15 Oct →
dust213–60.0232%14 Oct →
dust213–110.0420%14 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0417%13 Oct →
dust215–150.0819%8 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0119%8 Oct →
anubis8–130.0819%7 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0118%7 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0436%30 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.087%28 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0317%26 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0811%26 Sept →
ancient13–90.0113%26 Sept →
anubis13–80.0233%26 Sept →
anubis11–130.009%26 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0116%24 Sept →
cache13–90.0422%23 Sept →
dust213–70.0313%23 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.048%23 Sept →
ancient9–130.0020%22 Sept →
anubis16–140.0115%21 Sept →
dust20–3-0.070%21 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.088%21 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0312%21 Sept →
dust26–130.0520%20 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0129%17 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0211%17 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0318%17 Sept →
ancient13–50.0816%16 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0318%16 Sept →
nuke3–00.1050%16 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.049%16 Sept →
inferno13–60.059%16 Sept →
inferno9–130.0729%15 Sept →
dust213–50.0126%14 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0420%14 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0418%14 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0120%14 Sept →
dust213–110.0219%14 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0030%14 Sept →
anubis13–40.0625%12 Sept →
inferno13–100.0023%12 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0428%10 Sept →
inferno0–13-0.0919%10 Sept →
dust213–90.0133%10 Sept →
dust215–150.1017%10 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0411%9 Sept →
dust211–130.0114%8 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0217%8 Sept →
dust210–130.0315%7 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0212%7 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0220%7 Sept →
inferno13–20.0421%6 Sept →
nuke16–14-0.0122%6 Sept →
anubis9–130.0219%6 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0219%6 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0421%6 Sept →
ancient13–20.0822%5 Sept →
dust213–20.0815%5 Sept →
ancient13–40.0624%5 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0321%5 Sept →
cache8–130.0529%4 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.028%4 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0520%4 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0720%3 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0222%3 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0513%3 Sept →
dust213–2-0.0119%3 Sept →
dust213–80.0126%3 Sept →
dust213–100.0228%1 Sept →
dust213–50.0415%1 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0215%1 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0415%31 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.