Cleaner The GrandDad

Cleaner The GrandDad — CS2 Stats

76561197981020890[U:1:20755162]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,042Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating10,430Blue band · top ~52.6% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,430 +3,179 12 Sept – 26 Oct · 24 days played
5,00011,143peak 11,14312 Sept26 Oct
11,599Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-09-12

Premier CS Rating

  • 713 below peak (11,143)
  • +3,837 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 4,570 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-12

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCleaner The GrandDadPREMIER10,430 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning60
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–47–4Last 10049%Win rateWLWLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +1.4pp headshot accuracy · +52ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility6.7
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch3.4

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 53% on T to 37% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning6.0
Utility6.7
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time599ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 18 Oct →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · cache, 23 Oct →
414msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · ancient, 17 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 18 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
4–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 12mirageWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2313–1057%-0.00
dust2C156–940%-0.02
cacheC146–843%0.00
mirageC145–936%-0.02
ancientB126–650%-0.01
infernoS128–467%0.01
anubisB105–550%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

478Matches
49%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
82.9ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5760%1.2116.2
Ancient5740%1.0316.2
Nuke5167%1.2314.9
Train1527%0.9916.3
Vertigo743%0.8613.4
Mirage617%0.6610.2
Anubis30%1.0617.7
Dust230%0.6411.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
79.1%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
599msReaction time
53.2%T opening success
37.2%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
12.76HE damage / grenade
10.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.1571% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–30.0016%26 Oct →
cache10–130.0119%26 Oct →
nuke13–80.0016%26 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0021%26 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0624%26 Oct →
cache13–160.0215%26 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0217%25 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0719%25 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0318%25 Oct →
nuke13–50.0318%25 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0815%25 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0029%25 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0216%25 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0621%24 Oct →
nuke13–60.0120%24 Oct →
ancient13–80.0413%24 Oct →
cache7–130.0519%24 Oct →
inferno13–100.0219%24 Oct →
inferno13–70.0313%24 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.028%24 Oct →
nuke19–160.0214%24 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0421%24 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0227%23 Oct →
ancient13–40.0113%23 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0124%23 Oct →
anubis13–80.0315%23 Oct →
cache13–30.0331%23 Oct →
cache10–130.0019%22 Oct →
inferno13–30.0111%22 Oct →
ancient16–140.0012%22 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0119%22 Oct →
anubis13–90.0530%21 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0216%21 Oct →
cache13–40.0513%21 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0119%21 Oct →
nuke13–90.0213%19 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0311%19 Oct →
nuke4–130.0218%19 Oct →
nuke13–90.0320%19 Oct →
inferno13–110.0116%19 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0311%19 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0313%18 Oct →
anubis13–90.0418%18 Oct →
mirage13–70.0421%18 Oct →
dust213–1-0.0116%18 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0710%18 Oct →
dust213–40.1326%18 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0322%18 Oct →
ancient13–20.0114%17 Oct →
nuke13–1-0.0522%17 Oct →
cache13–4-0.049%17 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0514%17 Oct →
dust27–130.0128%17 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0116%17 Oct →
nuke10–130.0217%16 Oct →
nuke13–30.1012%16 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0115%16 Oct →
cache11–130.0115%16 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0518%16 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0620%15 Oct →
anubis6–130.016%15 Oct →
inferno13–100.019%15 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.048%15 Oct →
nuke13–90.0113%15 Oct →
anubis13–100.0712%14 Oct →
dust213–60.0316%14 Oct →
inferno11–130.0425%13 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.059%13 Oct →
mirage13–80.0024%12 Oct →
mirage5–130.0015%12 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0422%12 Oct →
dust213–90.0417%11 Oct →
mirage13–80.0417%11 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0018%11 Oct →
nuke13–100.0921%11 Oct →
ancient13–100.0419%7 Oct →
nuke13–80.0119%7 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0312%7 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0317%7 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0315%7 Oct →
inferno13–80.0818%7 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0423%5 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.028%5 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0415%4 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0710%4 Oct →
anubis7–130.0027%4 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0119%4 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0927%4 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0514%4 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0630%4 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0313%3 Oct →
mirage6–130.0226%3 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0212%2 Oct →
cache9–130.0116%1 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.079%1 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0613%1 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0516%30 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0220%30 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0716%30 Sept →
inferno13–40.0316%28 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.