j0nesi

j0nesi — CS2 Stats

FI76561197980352031[U:1:20086303]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,347Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating19,384Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#82149 of 221782 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,840 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 23 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,384 -5,865 23 Mar12 Sept · 32 days played
19,06026,377peak 26,37723 Mar12 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,840 +0 1 Sept5 Sept · 2 observations
1,8401,840peak 1,8401 Sept5 Sept
26,377Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,840Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-03-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,840
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 161 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 6,993 below peak (26,377)
  • +99 over 30 days · steady
  • -3,984 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 616 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGj0nesiFACEITLevel 9 · 1,840 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER19,384 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,840csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning40
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42571Last 10042%Win rateLLLTWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −9.4pp headshot accuracy · +18ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility6.7
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 573ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.0
Utility6.7
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time571ms−80ms
first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–9 · cache, 29 Apr
59%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · nuke, 29 Mar
422msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 14 Aug
13–1Biggest win · overpass, 7 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 9mirageWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2214864%0.00
ancientC2291341%-0.02
anubisD1951426%-0.02
cacheS96367%0.04
infernoD92722%-0.03
overpassC94544%-0.01
mirageD5050%-0.03
office32167%0.06
dust22020%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

561Matches
53%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
73.2ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke3560%1.4215.7
Anubis2255%1.1214.4
Ancient2148%1.2217.4
Inferno2070%1.4216.9
Train1457%1.2215.4
Overpass1136%1.0312.0
Vertigo540%1.0717.8
Dust210%0.6813.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
74.0%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
573msReaction time
22.9%T opening success
36.5%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
10.39HE damage / grenade
15.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.8966% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–160.0119%12 Sept
cache11–130.0215%26 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0518%26 Aug
cache15–15-0.0013%24 Aug
nuke13–40.0123%24 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0420%23 Aug
anubis16–140.0314%23 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0417%19 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0511%19 Aug
anubis5–13-0.100%14 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0413%14 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0130%14 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0317%6 Aug
nuke5–130.0624%6 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0131%6 Aug
cache8–13-0.0317%4 Aug
office13–90.0529%3 Aug
nuke13–40.0244%2 Aug
anubis11–130.0117%2 Aug
cache13–8-0.0221%1 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0021%1 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0825%1 Aug
office9–130.0325%1 Aug
office9–60.0929%1 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0432%1 Aug
dust25–13-0.0717%23 Jul
nuke13–110.0327%23 Jul
inferno13–40.0422%18 Jul
cache13–30.1119%18 Jul
cache13–50.0515%18 Jul
mirage6–130.0332%18 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0521%17 Jul
cache13–80.0121%17 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0132%17 Jul
dust23–13-0.0716%10 Jul
ancient8–130.0119%5 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0522%5 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0718%5 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0610%3 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0126%3 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0927%3 Jul
ancient13–100.0225%29 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0338%29 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0221%27 Jun
cache13–20.0312%27 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0413%3 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0129%3 Jun
ancient13–60.0025%28 May
anubis16–130.0125%28 May
overpass8–13-0.0510%15 May
mirage7–13-0.0519%15 May
nuke13–8-0.0318%15 May
ancient3–13-0.0521%8 May
anubis13–80.0211%8 May
anubis8–130.0827%7 May
nuke13–50.0113%7 May
overpass13–10.0430%7 May
ancient2–13-0.0325%6 May
nuke9–130.0728%6 May
ancient10–130.0418%4 May
nuke13–70.0213%4 May
ancient8–13-0.0416%4 May
anubis9–13-0.0510%3 May
nuke13–110.0120%3 May
inferno11–13-0.0615%2 May
ancient11–13-0.0315%2 May
cache13–90.1629%29 Apr
overpass13–60.0115%29 Apr
anubis3–13-0.0311%29 Apr
inferno2–130.0428%19 Apr
overpass9–130.0619%19 Apr
ancient13–4-0.0226%19 Apr
ancient13–110.0628%18 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0720%18 Apr
nuke13–30.0028%18 Apr
overpass7–13-0.0513%17 Apr
anubis14–160.0513%17 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0221%17 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0729%16 Apr
ancient13–110.0022%16 Apr
ancient13–9-0.0223%16 Apr
overpass14–16-0.0327%11 Apr
overpass9–130.0216%11 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0717%7 Apr
anubis8–13-0.049%7 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0612%7 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0422%6 Apr
nuke16–140.0325%6 Apr
anubis14–16-0.0426%29 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0331%29 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0059%29 Mar
nuke13–90.0922%27 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0018%27 Mar
overpass13–10-0.0213%27 Mar
anubis13–1-0.029%27 Mar
nuke3–130.0119%26 Mar
overpass13–9-0.0544%26 Mar
ancient5–13-0.067%23 Mar
ancient7–30.0217%23 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0324%23 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →