.JIM_BEAM

.JIM_BEAM — CS2 Stats

HU76561197979682770[U:1:19417042]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,900Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,444Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating26,124Top 10% of 212,910 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12616 of 259653 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (58 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,124 +4,624 19 Jul – 6 Sept · 30 days played
20,65426,124peak 26,12419 Jul6 Sept
26,124Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2026-07-19

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 26,124
  • +3,187 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,876 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate55.1%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy14.2%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.521.061.07above
Match win rate49.8%46.3%46.9%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 9 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG.JIM_BEAMFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER26,124 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning54
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT61–34–5Last 10061%Win rateWWWLWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · +46ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.7
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch1.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.4
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time508ms−68ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 508ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 24.9% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–7 · nuke, 19 Jul →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · cache, 2 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 6–2 · dust2, 27 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 26 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W3Current streak
11–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 92% over 13cacheWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B4323–2053%0.02
mirageA1811–761%0.02
infernoS1510–567%0.03
nukeS1312–192%0.03
cacheB115–645%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

148,106Lifetime kills
1.52K/D · Top 5% of Level 8 players
5,642Matches
49.8%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
55.1%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
14.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
12,989MVPs
2,439Hours (in match)
5,115Bombs planted
1,570Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

18,843dust2
5,608inferno
3,874nuke
1,191train
680vertigo
594office
356italy
349aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

146Matches
55%Win rate
1.39Avg K/D
93.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2152%1.6516.3
Dust21681%1.8722.2
Inferno1457%1.3016.9
Ancient650%1.6517.2
Vertigo540%0.9815.4
Anubis50%0.8912.8
Nuke333%1.5125.3
Cache367%1.8921.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
77.2%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
497msReaction time
36.5%T opening success
43.8%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
8.20HE damage / grenade
6.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.5031% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–100.0030%6 Sept →
cache13–30.0118%6 Sept →
nuke16–14-0.0314%30 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0128%30 Aug →
inferno13–100.0529%27 Aug →
dust26–2-0.1029%27 Aug →
dust213–100.0018%27 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0526%26 Aug →
dust213–10.0816%26 Aug →
dust210–130.0723%26 Aug →
inferno13–100.0131%25 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0416%25 Aug →
nuke13–40.0527%25 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0442%25 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0318%24 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0221%23 Aug →
inferno11–130.0919%23 Aug →
inferno11–130.0220%23 Aug →
dust213–100.0925%22 Aug →
dust28–130.0229%22 Aug →
nuke16–130.0115%22 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0324%22 Aug →
nuke13–70.0328%22 Aug →
mirage13–50.1123%22 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0335%22 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.069%21 Aug →
mirage5–20.0530%21 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0032%21 Aug →
inferno13–20.0221%20 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0124%20 Aug →
cache13–40.0527%20 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0116%20 Aug →
dust213–60.0443%20 Aug →
dust215–150.0116%19 Aug →
dust213–70.0232%19 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0216%19 Aug →
inferno9–130.0324%18 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0226%18 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0419%18 Aug →
mirage4–130.0120%18 Aug →
dust27–130.0242%18 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0611%17 Aug →
mirage13–100.0618%17 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0124%17 Aug →
dust216–130.0519%16 Aug →
nuke13–60.0328%16 Aug →
dust213–70.0317%15 Aug →
mirage13–60.0637%15 Aug →
nuke13–20.0533%15 Aug →
dust213–110.0336%15 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0130%14 Aug →
dust213–90.0529%14 Aug →
dust213–160.0224%13 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0411%13 Aug →
dust210–130.0616%13 Aug →
inferno13–30.1317%13 Aug →
dust210–130.0124%11 Aug →
dust29–130.0928%11 Aug →
dust213–80.0138%11 Aug →
dust25–13-0.1010%10 Aug →
nuke13–50.1339%10 Aug →
inferno13–90.0528%10 Aug →
mirage13–50.0526%7 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0720%7 Aug →
dust26–130.0133%7 Aug →
mirage13–160.0332%6 Aug →
mirage13–110.0526%6 Aug →
inferno13–90.0137%6 Aug →
dust213–80.0026%6 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0230%3 Aug →
mirage13–40.0514%3 Aug →
dust213–40.0329%2 Aug →
cache3–130.0743%2 Aug →
nuke16–140.0735%30 Jul →
cache15–15-0.0732%29 Jul →
dust213–100.0623%29 Jul →
dust213–50.0530%29 Jul →
dust214–160.0427%28 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0420%28 Jul →
dust222–200.0223%27 Jul →
cache13–60.1026%27 Jul →
inferno13–80.0529%26 Jul →
dust213–80.0120%26 Jul →
dust213–50.0822%26 Jul →
mirage13–20.0933%25 Jul →
dust225–230.0527%25 Jul →
cache16–140.0324%23 Jul →
mirage11–130.0213%23 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0421%22 Jul →
inferno16–12-0.0125%22 Jul →
dust213–30.0922%22 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0220%21 Jul →
inferno13–90.028%21 Jul →
cache13–20.038%21 Jul →
dust26–130.0222%21 Jul →
mirage13–80.0418%21 Jul →
cache9–130.0128%21 Jul →
nuke13–70.1526%19 Jul →
nuke13–70.0240%19 Jul →
inferno13–110.0520%19 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.