Hikikyrpälö

Hikikyrpälö — CS2 Stats

FI76561197976931115[U:1:16665387]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,064Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,034Top 25% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#32259 of 259983 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,034 +1,029 8 Sept – 3 Nov · 28 days played
20,73424,034peak 24,0348 Sept3 Nov
Faceit ELO: 2,198 +0 1 Sept – 24 Sept · 4 observations
2,1982,198peak 2,1981 Sept24 Sept
24,316Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,198Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-09-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,198
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 302 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 24,034
  • +1,968 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 966 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-12
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-12

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHikikyrpälöPREMIER24,034 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,198csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning68
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–43–5Last 10052%Win rateLWWWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −6.4pp headshot accuracy · −15ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 20

  • 10–7–3 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility5.1
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch2.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning6.8
Utility5.1
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels6.9
Win Impact8.1

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time531ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 553ms → last ⅓ avg 531ms
Headshot accuracy24.0%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 24.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–3 · inferno, 31 Oct →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · cache, 16 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · anubis, 18 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 8 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 82% over 11ancientWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2514–1156%0.00
cacheB2211–1150%0.01
mirageC156–940%0.00
infernoC146–843%0.00
anubisS119–282%0.02
ancientC83–538%-0.02
nukeA53–260%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,545Matches
50%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
73.9ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust27862%1.1115.1
Anubis4459%1.0516.4
Inferno4450%1.0014.2
Ancient4146%0.9614.2
Mirage3928%0.9315.5
Overpass1650%1.1016.4
Nuke944%1.0315.8
Train540%0.7210.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.1%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.7%Spray accuracy
78.6%Counter-strafing
7.1°Preaim
533msReaction time
62.2%T opening success
52.8%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
11.76HE damage / grenade
4.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4586 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust27–13-0.0727%3 Nov →
cache16–130.0018%3 Nov →
inferno13–110.019%3 Nov →
ancient13–90.0227%3 Nov →
dust26–13-0.0723%3 Nov →
ancient13–11-0.0122%3 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0123%3 Nov →
anubis13–50.0627%3 Nov →
anubis13–50.0315%3 Nov →
dust28–130.1018%3 Nov →
inferno15–150.0229%2 Nov →
nuke16–130.0340%2 Nov →
mirage9–130.0529%2 Nov →
nuke15–15-0.0519%2 Nov →
inferno15–150.0314%2 Nov →
anubis13–100.1119%2 Nov →
mirage7–130.0130%2 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.0333%2 Nov →
cache13–60.0733%2 Nov →
cache13–30.0426%1 Nov →
anubis13–30.1115%1 Nov →
ancient14–16-0.0218%1 Nov →
ancient13–9-0.0130%1 Nov →
cache13–80.0325%1 Nov →
cache7–130.0231%1 Nov →
inferno13–30.1520%31 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0033%31 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0020%31 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0018%30 Oct →
dust213–110.0432%30 Oct →
cache13–70.0319%27 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0332%27 Oct →
dust216–13-0.0715%23 Oct →
cache14–160.0013%23 Oct →
mirage13–110.038%22 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0616%19 Oct →
cache13–70.0430%19 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0139%19 Oct →
mirage13–30.0230%19 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0332%17 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0620%17 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.0822%16 Oct →
cache13–50.0323%16 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0120%16 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0322%16 Oct →
cache8–13-0.026%15 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0621%15 Oct →
dust213–100.0115%13 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0212%13 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0621%13 Oct →
cache16–140.0125%12 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0529%10 Oct →
cache14–160.0126%8 Oct →
anubis13–10.0921%8 Oct →
inferno15–150.0117%8 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0122%8 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0723%8 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0243%7 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0216%5 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0931%5 Oct →
dust26–130.0424%5 Oct →
dust213–50.0537%5 Oct →
anubis10–130.0333%5 Oct →
mirage13–90.0322%5 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0217%3 Oct →
nuke13–90.0131%26 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0317%20 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0021%20 Sept →
dust20–13-0.0429%20 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0616%20 Sept →
dust213–80.0315%19 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0525%19 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0823%19 Sept →
dust213–100.0328%19 Sept →
dust213–20.1230%19 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0128%19 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0328%19 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0120%19 Sept →
mirage5–130.0421%18 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0120%18 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0521%18 Sept →
dust213–70.0929%18 Sept →
inferno13–60.0221%18 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0419%18 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0217%17 Sept →
inferno9–130.0321%17 Sept →
dust213–30.0213%17 Sept →
cache13–50.0043%16 Sept →
anubis13–110.0224%16 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0319%16 Sept →
mirage15–150.0120%16 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0235%12 Sept →
mirage13–90.0424%12 Sept →
dust29–130.0327%9 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.083%9 Sept →
cache9–130.1019%9 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0015%8 Sept →
dust213–60.0221%8 Sept →
cache13–90.0217%8 Sept →
mirage13–50.0224%8 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.