RetuX

RetuX — CS2 Stats

DE76561197976899764[U:1:16634036]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,565Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,031Top 50% of 204,793 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#95327 of 251924 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,630 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,031 -1,843 18 May – 11 Oct · 11 days played
18,53920,874peak 20,87418 May11 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,630 +0 30 Aug – 23 Sept · 3 observations
1,6301,630peak 1,63030 Aug23 Sept
20,874Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,630Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-05-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,630
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 121 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,843 below peak (20,874)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 969 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRetuXFACEITLevel 8 · 1,630 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,031 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,630csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning52
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateLWWLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.2pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 601ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility6.9
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning5.2
Utility6.9
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time605ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 5–0 · ancient, 22 Jun →
53%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · cache, 26 Aug →
469msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · inferno, 27 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 21 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 21mirageWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2510–1540%-0.01
ancientS2114–767%-0.01
anubisD186–1233%-0.02
cacheA1710–759%-0.03
nukeA106–460%-0.02
mirageD51–420%-0.01
dust2—31–233%0.04
overpass—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,895Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
73.0ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5357%0.9514.3
Ancient5342%0.8913.8
Anubis4549%0.9114.0
Nuke2744%0.7912.4
Mirage1338%0.8516.1
Overpass1136%0.8712.6
Dust21164%0.8613.6
Vertigo560%0.9215.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
30.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.7%Spray accuracy
77.5%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
609msReaction time
48.4%T opening success
36.1%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
12.45HE damage / grenade
6.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.1291% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage3–130.0127%11 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0217%10 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.058%9 Oct →
mirage5–130.0331%9 Oct →
cache10–130.0024%7 Oct →
ancient1–6-0.0529%7 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0133%6 Oct →
mirage3–8-0.0214%5 Oct →
dust213–70.0216%4 Oct →
ancient13–90.0220%4 Oct →
ancient16–13-0.0222%1 Oct →
anubis5–130.0212%1 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0036%1 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0319%29 Sept →
inferno13–70.0833%28 Sept →
inferno9–130.0020%27 Sept →
dust210–130.1021%26 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0222%26 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0326%26 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0221%24 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0225%24 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0715%23 Sept →
ancient13–90.0118%22 Sept →
inferno9–130.0828%16 Sept →
ancient13–70.0524%15 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0537%15 Sept →
ancient13–20.0212%14 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0219%14 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0119%13 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0114%13 Sept →
inferno3–130.0324%11 Sept →
anubis5–130.0517%10 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0212%9 Sept →
inferno13–70.0424%9 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0419%9 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0513%8 Sept →
inferno13–30.0424%8 Sept →
anubis13–100.0013%7 Sept →
inferno12–120.0020%7 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0612%6 Sept →
anubis13–110.0111%3 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0620%1 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0328%31 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0622%31 Aug →
cache13–90.0120%30 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0423%30 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0323%29 Aug →
ancient13–90.0114%29 Aug →
cache0–8-0.0643%27 Aug →
anubis13–3-0.0029%27 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0227%26 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0553%26 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.098%24 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0223%24 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0435%24 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0326%24 Aug →
anubis2–130.0131%24 Aug →
anubis8–130.0134%23 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0241%23 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0715%23 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0217%21 Aug →
nuke13–30.0226%20 Aug →
ancient13–110.0324%17 Aug →
inferno13–20.1038%17 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0627%16 Aug →
inferno8–130.0327%15 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0213%13 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0510%13 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0317%13 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0831%2 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0414%2 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0521%2 Aug →
inferno13–50.0218%2 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0917%2 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.1012%22 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0030%22 Jun →
anubis13–5-0.0311%22 Jun →
ancient5–00.1635%22 Jun →
inferno2–13-0.1025%21 Jun →
nuke13–10.0542%21 Jun →
anubis13–11-0.0122%21 Jun →
nuke13–7-0.0027%1 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0221%1 Jun →
ancient4–13-0.0319%1 Jun →
cache13–10-0.0622%31 May →
cache6–130.0216%31 May →
anubis13–50.0118%31 May →
anubis4–13-0.0713%31 May →
inferno10–13-0.0315%31 May →
ancient13–5-0.0714%30 May →
inferno13–7-0.0729%30 May →
ancient9–130.0214%30 May →
overpass5–13-0.0213%30 May →
anubis11–130.0219%28 May →
ancient9–13-0.0713%28 May →
inferno12–16-0.0716%28 May →
cache13–5-0.0517%26 May →
cache10–13-0.0016%24 May →
nuke13–3-0.0217%20 May →
nuke11–13-0.0222%18 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.