TATIHOUjnr — CS2 Stats

76561197976609518[U:1:16343790]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,412Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,166Hours in CS45Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,419Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#1688 of 12189 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,837 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

25,419Peak Premier on CSDB

1,837Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,837
Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 164 to go
Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 25,419
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,581 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-08-28
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	51.1%	52.8%	1.7% short
Shot accuracy	8.9%	13.7%	4.8% short
Kill/death ratio	1.01	1.08	0.07 short
Match win rate	47.6%	49.2%	1.6% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 10 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning61

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–45–5Last 10050%Win rateLLLWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7

Aggression7.8

Utility5.1

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels3.8

Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning6.1

Utility5.1

Mechanics6.6

Opening Duels3.8

Win Impact2.6

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time493ms−30ms

first ⅓ avg 523ms → last ⅓ avg 493ms

Headshot accuracy23.5%−4.7%

first ⅓ avg 28.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–5

13–1Biggest win — cache

6Longest win streak

L3Current streak

4–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8mirageWeakest map · 44% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	37	18–19	49%	0.02
inferno	B	21	10–11	48%	0.02
mirage	C	16	7–9	44%	0.03
nuke	A	11	7–4	64%	0.02
anubis	S	8	6–2	75%	0.05
cache	—	4	2–2	50%	0.03
ancient	—	1	0–1	0%	0.06
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

78,365Lifetime kills

1.01K/D

3,861Matches

47.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players

51.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players

8.9%Shot accuracy

9,649MVPs

1,955Hours (in match)

4,751Bombs planted

1,106Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,757

M4A4 / M4A1-S13,998

AWP8,024

Desert Eagle6,748

P2000 / USP-S4,851

Glock-183,525

SSG 083,211

Galil AR1,555

FAMAS1,550

Knife1,163

Lifetime map wins

21,211dust2

5,807inferno

1,963nuke

711train

470vertigo

232cbble

35office

25lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

718Matches

51%Win rate

1.15Avg K/D

82.2ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	171	55%	1.23	16.9
Inferno	132	48%	1.11	16.6
Mirage	97	47%	1.03	15.3
Anubis	91	53%	1.12	15.5
Ancient	55	53%	1.18	17.5
Nuke	48	54%	1.16	16.3
Train	21	38%	0.89	14.8
Overpass	17	47%	1.14	16.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.7%Headshot accuracy

34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.3%Spray accuracy

79.8%Counter-strafing

7.6°Preaim

494msReaction time

32.1%T opening success

58.4%CT opening success

0.54Enemies flashed / flash

5.5%Flash assists

7.56HE damage / grenade

7.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.1325% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	2–13	0.00	31%	27 Aug →
ancient	19–22	0.06	19%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–16	0.04	29%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.09	15%	22 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.05	21%	22 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	26%	19 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.10	20%	19 Aug →
anubis	3–13	0.01	38%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.06	24%	18 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	36%	17 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	7%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–16	-0.00	18%	15 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	27%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–2	-0.03	10%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.13	28%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.08	29%	10 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.01	32%	10 Aug →
inferno	17–19	-0.00	23%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.06	15%	8 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.02	22%	5 Aug →
cache	12–16	-0.03	15%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.09	26%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.02	30%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	23%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–16	0.07	17%	1 Aug →
nuke	4–13	0.01	21%	1 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	29%	1 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.03	15%	31 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.04	27%	31 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.07	54%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.11	13%	31 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.03	18%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	18%	30 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.04	33%	29 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	20%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.07	16%	28 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.03	31%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.05	21%	27 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.05	16%	27 Jul →
nuke	16–12	-0.02	22%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.03	16%	27 Jul →
vertigo	10–13	0.01	17%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.11	30%	26 Jul →
dust2	0–4	-0.02	33%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.07	26%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.10	24%	26 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.03	50%	26 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.07	30%	26 Jul →
mirage	10–6	0.06	27%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.02	29%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.08	38%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	24%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.01	18%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	23%	25 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	31%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	26%	24 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.06	30%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.05	17%	24 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	16%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.01	10%	23 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.08	23%	23 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.07	18%	22 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.00	27%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.04	18%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.05	22%	20 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.01	10%	20 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.02	26%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.10	35%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.04	37%	19 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.07	38%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.05	19%	16 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.03	33%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.11	24%	16 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	32%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.03	17%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.07	27%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.03	36%	15 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.00	35%	14 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.01	31%	14 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.09	27%	14 Jul →
inferno	11–3	-0.02	21%	13 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	23%	12 Jul →
anubis	16–14	0.06	27%	12 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.05	20%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.03	15%	12 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.08	22%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.05	15%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.04	36%	11 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.08	30%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.03	25%	11 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.00	33%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.08	34%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.01	31%	10 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	28%	9 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	37%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.03	27%	3 Jul →
overpass	6–13	-0.04	33%	3 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.04	29%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.07	29%	2 Jul →
dust2	12–2	-0.00	24%	1 Jul →