Stahl

Stahl — CS2 Stats

SE76561197975050897[U:1:14785169]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,099Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,499Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,029 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,099 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 20 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,812 +450 21 Apr22 Jun · 15 days played
24,52326,812peak 26,81221 Apr22 Jun
Faceit ELO: 2,029 +0 2 Sept20 Sept · 2 observations
2,0292,029peak 2,0292 Sept20 Sept
26,850Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,029Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-04-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,029
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 471 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,629), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate47.0%48.3%51.0%4.0% short
Shot accuracy17.3%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.061.071.090.02 short
Match win rate50.3%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStahlFACEITLevel 9 · 2,029 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,029csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning48
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50482Last 10050%Win rateWLLLLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · −66ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility5.5
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch1.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.8° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 627ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning4.8
Utility5.5
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time644ms+60ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 644ms
Headshot accuracy27.4%+4.6%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 27.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.33Best match rating · 9–1 · vertigo, 25 Apr
56%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · overpass, 17 Jun
375msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · mirage, 24 Apr
13–3Biggest win · mirage, 27 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
210In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC25111444%0.03
cacheB23121152%0.02
vertigoB20101050%0.03
dust2A85363%0.01
anubisD72529%0.01
ancient42250%-0.01
nuke330100%-0.04
inferno32167%-0.01
overpass220100%-0.02
cache_b21150%0.06
eldorado1010%-0.14
debris1010%0.03
tuscan_d1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

174,210Lifetime kills
1.06K/D
7,925Matches
50.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
47.0%Headshot %
17.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
23,334MVPs
4,499Hours (in match)
13,084Bombs planted
2,468Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4755,400
AWP30,545
Knife3,554
SG 5533,497
FAMAS3,369

Lifetime map wins

20,547vertigo
12,206inferno
8,890dust2
5,422nuke
1,467train
816cbble
312lake
207office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

873Matches
52%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
70.8ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5643%0.9414.6
Ancient2959%1.0215.1
Anubis2748%1.0014.4
Inferno2662%0.8913.0
Nuke2055%0.8813.3
Vertigo1953%0.9914.9
Dust21040%1.0812.7
Overpass825%0.8314.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.0%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.7%Spray accuracy
87.3%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
627msReaction time
36.2%T opening success
43.1%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
10.9%Flash assists
4.45HE damage / grenade
11.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.2407% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo9–5-0.0438%18 Sept
anubis7–130.0132%5 Aug
mirage14–160.0333%5 Aug
anubis9–130.0030%3 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0410%2 Aug
vertigo9–50.0630%2 Aug
vertigo4–9-0.0642%2 Aug
vertigo3–9-0.1319%1 Aug
dust20–8-0.120%27 Jul
cache1–13-0.0526%27 Jul
cache13–70.1645%25 Jul
ancient12–160.0021%24 Jul
mirage13–90.0125%24 Jul
cache16–120.0326%24 Jul
mirage0–13-0.020%24 Jul
mirage13–100.0120%24 Jul
anubis13–60.0336%24 Jul
eldorado5–9-0.1438%20 Jul
debris3–90.0335%20 Jul
anubis9–130.0432%18 Jul
vertigo8–80.0638%23 Jun
mirage13–40.1139%22 Jun
overpass13–40.0056%17 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0319%14 Jun
mirage9–130.0222%13 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0219%13 Jun
cache13–90.0627%12 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0518%12 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0216%12 Jun
vertigo11–130.0440%8 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0525%7 Jun
dust213–70.0724%7 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0023%6 Jun
dust219–17-0.0434%6 Jun
inferno13–90.0216%6 Jun
vertigo9–6-0.0944%4 Jun
vertigo7–90.0928%4 Jun
vertigo9–00.1629%3 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0530%31 May
dust213–90.0119%30 May
mirage10–130.0421%30 May
mirage13–30.0126%27 May
vertigo7–13-0.0019%27 May
cache13–100.0344%16 May
tuscan_d4–13-0.0118%16 May
vertigo13–9-0.0326%16 May
mirage13–80.0123%16 May
vertigo13–5-0.0810%16 May
cache4–130.0015%15 May
dust213–80.0424%15 May
mirage11–130.0219%15 May
vertigo13–60.0924%14 May
mirage8–130.0223%14 May
vertigo13–80.0214%14 May
cache13–30.1018%14 May
dust213–80.0818%13 May
cache8–13-0.0129%13 May
anubis13–110.0521%13 May
overpass19–16-0.0316%8 May
cache1–130.0025%8 May
mirage13–70.0421%3 May
cache6–13-0.0825%3 May
cache2–13-0.0138%3 May
mirage7–130.0234%2 May
cache13–80.0326%2 May
cache13–60.0023%2 May
anubis10–13-0.0327%1 May
cache1–13-0.0620%1 May
cache8–00.000%1 May
cache13–50.0426%30 Apr
mirage9–130.0427%30 Apr
cache8–130.0429%30 Apr
cache4–13-0.090%30 Apr
cache11–130.0418%30 Apr
cache8–13-0.0734%30 Apr
cache13–90.1045%30 Apr
cache13–40.1230%30 Apr
cache13–40.0524%29 Apr
mirage13–80.0017%28 Apr
nuke13–5-0.078%28 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0216%28 Apr
dust211–13-0.0118%28 Apr
cache_b10–13-0.0528%26 Apr
mirage13–40.1111%26 Apr
mirage13–160.0227%26 Apr
vertigo8–8-0.0221%26 Apr
mirage9–130.0913%25 Apr
cache_b13–40.1727%25 Apr
vertigo9–50.0026%25 Apr
ancient13–70.0219%25 Apr
vertigo9–10.3326%25 Apr
mirage13–100.0338%24 Apr
vertigo7–9-0.0220%23 Apr
mirage13–70.0633%21 Apr
mirage11–130.0624%21 Apr
mirage9–130.0226%21 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0422%21 Apr
vertigo7–90.0618%21 Apr
vertigo6–90.0735%21 Apr
dust29–130.0625%20 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →