mch

mch — CS2 Stats

BR76561197974487712[U:1:14221984]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

112Tracked matches67%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+4Tracked matches · now 112
+10.0ppWin rate · 56.7% → 66.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,603 +6,805 11 Nov – 8 Jan · 9 days played
14,79821,603peak 21,60311 Nov8 Jan
21,603Peak Premier in tracked matches
54Days played since 2018-03-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmchFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning61
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT62–36–2Last 10062%Win rateWWWWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −2.9pp headshot accuracy · −48ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility4.7
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning6.1
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time594ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 580ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–9 · overpass, 1 Sept →
53%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · mirage, 14 Feb →
398msFastest reaction time · 7–14 · mirage, 15 Feb →
16–1Biggest win · nuke, 1 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W7Current streak
5–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
32Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2112–957%0.04
overpassS1511–473%0.04
infernoS1410–471%0.05
dust2B137–654%0.04
mirageC104–640%-0.01
anubisA95–456%0.03
cacheS54–180%0.00
ancient—42–250%0.03
train—33–0100%0.12
contact—10–10%-0.02
memento—11–0100%0.13
mills—11–0100%0.04
vertigo—11–0100%0.05
basalt—10–10%0.09
insertion2—11–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

242Matches
72%Win rate
1.66Avg K/D
—ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
17Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage520%0.8011.6
Nuke450%1.3314.8
Anubis3100%1.7219.0
Ancient250%1.2418.5
Inferno1100%3.2513.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
591msReaction time
34.1%T opening success
49.2%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
10.03HE damage / grenade
8.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.1323% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass13–60.0021%1 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0024%1 Oct →
nuke13–110.0222%1 Oct →
cache16–12-0.0216%30 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0218%29 Apr →
cache13–50.0120%29 Apr →
cache13–100.0323%28 Apr →
dust26–13-0.0113%11 Mar →
dust23–13-0.0630%13 Feb →
anubis16–120.0122%10 Feb →
dust212–160.0236%10 Feb →
inferno15–100.0114%7 Jan →
overpass13–70.0519%7 Jan →
nuke13–100.0229%7 Jan →
contact8–13-0.0217%14 Dec →
nuke5–13-0.0123%15 Oct →
inferno13–50.0624%15 Oct →
dust210–130.0321%15 Oct →
train13–40.1032%15 Oct →
overpass13–30.0424%16 Jul →
nuke10–130.0221%9 Jul →
inferno13–50.089%8 Jan →
train13–60.1520%20 Nov →
memento9–40.1322%27 Jun →
mills13–50.0432%26 Jun →
mirage7–14-0.0614%15 Feb →
mirage13–7-0.0253%14 Feb →
nuke13–90.0129%14 Feb →
inferno13–20.0713%14 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.0526%27 Nov →
ancient13–160.0128%27 Nov →
anubis13–70.1132%27 Nov →
nuke5–13-0.0128%27 Nov →
nuke5–13-0.0415%27 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0430%26 Nov →
anubis13–50.0723%26 Nov →
nuke13–30.1426%26 Nov →
ancient13–50.0511%26 Nov →
anubis13–100.0611%26 Nov →
mirage6–130.0322%26 Nov →
anubis7–13-0.0524%24 Nov →
overpass13–20.1323%22 Nov →
inferno13–30.0416%22 Nov →
nuke13–110.1329%17 Nov →
mirage16–13-0.0017%17 Nov →
nuke13–7-0.0027%16 Nov →
nuke13–90.0415%16 Nov →
nuke13–110.0317%16 Nov →
mirage3–130.0433%16 Nov →
overpass11–130.0021%16 Nov →
overpass13–20.0615%14 Nov →
inferno13–20.0924%14 Nov →
nuke11–13-0.0136%13 Nov →
overpass10–130.0026%13 Nov →
anubis12–16-0.0123%13 Nov →
mirage13–7-0.0317%12 Nov →
anubis13–80.0520%12 Nov →
inferno1–13-0.0348%12 Nov →
anubis3–130.0522%12 Nov →
nuke6–130.0429%12 Nov →
inferno8–00.0117%11 Nov →
nuke10–13-0.0018%11 Nov →
mirage13–90.0318%11 Nov →
inferno13–50.1425%29 Sept →
inferno10–130.0524%13 Sept →
anubis10–130.0129%10 Sept →
vertigo13–70.0511%8 Sept →
overpass13–100.0131%8 Sept →
mirage9–130.0320%8 Sept →
ancient16–20.0923%6 Sept →
inferno16–60.0121%6 Sept →
inferno10–130.0531%6 Sept →
overpass13–90.1621%1 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0214%1 Sept →
inferno13–90.0241%1 Sept →
overpass13–40.1132%1 Sept →
dust216–90.0919%30 Aug →
nuke15–190.0629%8 Aug →
train16–100.1023%3 Aug →
overpass7–16-0.0317%3 Aug →
nuke19–160.1018%21 Jul →
dust216–60.0923%21 Jul →
dust28–16-0.0233%21 Jul →
cache15–150.0127%15 Jul →
nuke16–40.1422%13 Jun →
dust28–160.0718%11 May →
nuke16–8-0.0113%10 May →
inferno13–160.0418%29 Jan →
dust216–90.1423%29 Jan →
overpass16–100.1027%23 Jan →
overpass16–60.0311%20 Jan →
dust216–130.1326%19 Jan →
dust219–170.0211%11 Jan →
ancient14–16-0.0112%5 Jan →
nuke16–10.1338%1 Aug →
dust216–50.0040%13 Jun →
basalt8–80.0910%12 Jan →
insertion29–40.0324%5 Nov →
overpass8–170.0013%24 Mar →
overpass16–50.0020%23 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.