Narska

Narska — CS2 Stats

FI76561197973127985[U:1:12862257]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,810Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating28,336Top 5% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2014 of 251744 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Oct 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,810 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,336 +1,023 7 May – 2 Oct · 28 days played
26,15728,336peak 28,3367 May2 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,588 +0 30 Aug – 16 Sept · 4 observations
2,5882,588peak 2,58830 Aug16 Sept
28,452Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,588Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-05-07

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 28,336
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,149 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 1,664 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNarskaFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER28,336 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,588csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning74
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–50–3Last 10047%Win rateLLLWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · −85ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 9–8–3 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility6.0
Positioning7.4
Opening Duels5.9
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Reaction time. 610ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning7.4
Utility6.0
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact5.6

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time617ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy22.4%+6.6%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 22.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 7–0 · anubis, 15 Jul →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · ancient, 2 Aug →
313msFastest reaction time · 3–6 · nuke, 5 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 6 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 78% over 9dust2Weakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB2111–1052%0.02
ancientC197–1237%0.01
nukeA1710–759%-0.00
infernoD113–827%-0.02
dust2D102–820%0.00
cacheA106–460%0.02
mirageS97–278%0.02
overpass—31–233%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,449Matches
52%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
81.2ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis18057%1.0716.6
Nuke15662%1.0915.8
Ancient13947%0.9616.2
Mirage10746%1.0216.3
Dust29149%1.0015.2
Inferno7442%1.0817.1
Train4965%1.3819.0
Cache3749%0.9815.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.9%Headshot accuracy
40.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
86.8%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
610msReaction time
44.8%T opening success
56.7%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
9.99HE damage / grenade
9.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–160.0618%1 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0723%1 Sept →
nuke14–160.0323%20 Aug →
inferno16–12-0.0220%20 Aug →
ancient16–140.0422%20 Aug →
mirage13–90.0511%19 Aug →
anubis13–50.0923%19 Aug →
ancient13–60.0615%19 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0136%11 Aug →
anubis13–30.0222%11 Aug →
dust22–40.076%8 Aug →
anubis4–130.0922%8 Aug →
ancient15–150.0116%8 Aug →
dust215–150.0116%7 Aug →
ancient4–8-0.0022%7 Aug →
inferno13–20.0638%7 Aug →
nuke13–50.0419%7 Aug →
ancient15–150.0728%6 Aug →
cache13–10.0519%6 Aug →
nuke3–6-0.1129%5 Aug →
cache13–80.0824%5 Aug →
cache0–13-0.0913%5 Aug →
cache13–20.1027%5 Aug →
anubis13–50.1422%4 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0430%4 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0322%2 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0017%2 Aug →
inferno6–130.0418%2 Aug →
ancient0–13-0.0340%2 Aug →
mirage13–100.0122%2 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0233%2 Aug →
cache13–20.0624%2 Aug →
dust211–130.0023%2 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0727%1 Aug →
cache13–50.0828%1 Aug →
anubis13–30.1027%20 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0121%20 Jul →
mirage13–100.0126%20 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0013%15 Jul →
anubis7–00.1529%15 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0117%9 Jul →
cache15–19-0.0227%9 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0214%8 Jul →
nuke13–50.0925%3 Jul →
ancient14–160.0112%2 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0315%2 Jul →
nuke13–80.0125%2 Jul →
nuke2–13-0.049%1 Jul →
ancient13–80.048%30 Jun →
mirage5–2-0.0018%30 Jun →
anubis9–130.0020%30 Jun →
overpass10–13-0.0127%30 Jun →
mirage10–130.0025%30 Jun →
nuke13–60.0627%30 Jun →
ancient13–160.0216%29 Jun →
mirage13–60.0417%29 Jun →
ancient13–90.035%26 Jun →
dust28–130.0523%24 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0319%24 Jun →
anubis13–100.0215%17 Jun →
anubis13–40.0710%17 Jun →
dust213–90.0427%17 Jun →
overpass9–13-0.0413%12 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0035%12 Jun →
dust24–13-0.0621%12 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0112%12 Jun →
inferno14–160.0214%8 Jun →
nuke13–20.0619%6 Jun →
ancient16–120.0615%6 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0815%29 May →
inferno9–13-0.0615%29 May →
nuke10–13-0.0116%28 May →
ancient5–13-0.0510%28 May →
nuke13–4-0.0517%27 May →
mirage9–40.0215%27 May →
anubis1–4-0.1320%27 May →
anubis7–13-0.046%27 May →
anubis9–13-0.0013%26 May →
overpass13–6-0.0017%25 May →
cache11–13-0.0214%24 May →
ancient4–13-0.0415%24 May →
nuke13–110.0510%22 May →
nuke13–50.0117%22 May →
anubis13–11-0.0313%22 May →
anubis8–130.0015%19 May →
inferno0–13-0.1422%18 May →
anubis13–80.0815%18 May →
nuke13–90.0223%18 May →
ancient8–130.0018%18 May →
dust21–13-0.0922%18 May →
dust213–80.0818%15 May →
anubis2–130.0621%13 May →
anubis13–11-0.0112%12 May →
mirage13–8-0.0210%11 May →
nuke6–13-0.0523%11 May →
inferno4–13-0.068%8 May →
cache5–13-0.0221%8 May →
mirage10–130.0216%8 May →
ancient16–13-0.0025%7 May →
inferno4–13-0.066%7 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.