Fusixn

Fusixn — CS2 Stats

US76561197972369381[U:1:12103653]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

630Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,185Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,000Top 25% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21093 of 252624 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (43 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,000 +1,948 29 May – 4 Sept · 4 days played
23,05225,616peak 25,61629 May4 Sept
26,066Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2025-07-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 616 below peak (25,616)
  • +1,948 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,220), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate52.0%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy18.6%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.421.051.06above
Match win rate46.1%45.7%46.3%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 8 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFusixnFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER25,000 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning42
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–43–6Last 10051%Win rateLLLLLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +2.5pp headshot accuracy · +52ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 631ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility5.0
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch4.6

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 37% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.2
Utility5.0
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time593ms−78ms
first ⅓ avg 671ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy25.1%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.6% → last ⅓ avg 25.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 8–13 · italy, 11 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · dust2, 7 Apr →
414msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 9 May →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 30 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L5Current streak
8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

sanctumBest map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2012–860%0.02
nukeS1612–475%0.01
mirageC145–936%0.01
infernoC135–838%0.00
cacheA95–456%0.03
overpassC83–538%-0.00
ancientD71–614%-0.03
sanctumS54–180%0.03
anubis—32–167%0.02
train—21–150%0.02
italy—10–10%0.18
office—11–0100%0.07
poseidon—10–10%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

143,169Lifetime kills
1.42K/D · Top 10% of Level 7 players
5,183Matches
46.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
52.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
18.6%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 7 players
17,032MVPs
2,185Hours (in match)
3,537Bombs planted
1,445Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4746,657
AWP30,357
SSG 084,688
P2502,760
Tec-92,386

Lifetime map wins

9,883dust2
3,885inferno
1,688nuke
1,073cbble
902train
461vertigo
306lake
178office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

325Matches
56%Win rate
1.47Avg K/D
83.2ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21283%1.2118.0
Mirage944%1.0614.2
Inferno850%1.1315.1
Cache757%1.4721.4
Nuke475%0.9813.8
Anubis3100%1.6115.3
Overpass250%0.7011.5
Ancient250%1.0017.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.6%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
88.1%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
598msReaction time
17.5%T opening success
37.3%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
8.31HE damage / grenade
8.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.5138% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
italy8–130.1834%11 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0518%4 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0233%4 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0225%30 Aug →
cache5–130.0535%30 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0320%30 Aug →
dust213–10.0527%30 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0615%29 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0522%29 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0026%29 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0322%29 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0523%28 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0123%27 Aug →
ancient13–110.0028%27 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0223%26 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0620%26 Aug →
dust216–12-0.0127%26 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0613%16 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0229%16 Aug →
inferno5–130.0022%16 Aug →
nuke16–130.0434%16 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0527%16 Aug →
mirage13–60.0724%16 Aug →
dust213–60.1124%16 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0133%16 Aug →
mirage8–130.1333%4 Jul →
anubis13–70.0424%29 May →
nuke13–100.0430%27 May →
nuke11–130.0433%26 May →
ancient11–13-0.0218%26 May →
mirage9–13-0.048%20 May →
dust212–16-0.0219%19 May →
inferno9–13-0.0336%16 May →
dust213–110.0917%15 May →
dust216–12-0.0524%13 May →
cache8–13-0.0117%12 May →
nuke13–70.0236%10 May →
mirage11–130.0219%10 May →
dust29–130.0431%9 May →
inferno7–13-0.0414%9 May →
dust213–80.0721%9 May →
dust213–110.0220%9 May →
anubis7–13-0.0232%8 May →
inferno13–50.0422%8 May →
nuke13–5-0.0415%8 May →
cache13–100.0738%7 May →
inferno13–70.0424%5 May →
cache13–60.1525%5 May →
cache13–80.0733%5 May →
overpass13–80.0128%10 Apr →
train11–13-0.0236%10 Apr →
dust213–90.0527%10 Apr →
office13–40.0736%10 Apr →
mirage13–60.0329%8 Apr →
overpass11–13-0.0737%8 Apr →
dust213–5-0.0650%7 Apr →
nuke13–5-0.0926%7 Apr →
inferno15–15-0.0815%7 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.0644%7 Apr →
inferno13–3-0.0322%11 Mar →
mirage6–130.0022%11 Mar →
nuke13–70.0123%11 Mar →
dust213–16-0.0131%9 Mar →
sanctum9–60.0948%9 Mar →
sanctum9–6-0.0827%9 Mar →
anubis13–90.0531%23 Feb →
sanctum9–70.1535%19 Feb →
dust213–10.1619%26 Jan →
inferno13–60.0023%26 Jan →
overpass8–80.0633%26 Jan →
sanctum8–80.0628%26 Jan →
sanctum9–5-0.046%26 Jan →
poseidon7–90.0328%26 Jan →
nuke13–100.0633%3 Jan →
mirage13–10-0.0418%3 Jan →
dust29–13-0.0219%3 Jan →
overpass8–13-0.0123%3 Jan →
inferno11–13-0.0223%3 Jan →
dust213–100.0532%3 Jan →
nuke13–110.0335%2 Jan →
ancient15–150.0320%2 Jan →
overpass8–130.0314%7 Dec →
mirage9–130.0118%7 Dec →
dust213–110.0831%7 Dec →
nuke3–130.0425%7 Dec →
mirage12–120.0327%2 Dec →
inferno13–10.0831%2 Dec →
overpass13–10-0.0111%2 Dec →
inferno2–130.0935%1 Sept →
mirage13–160.0125%1 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.067%1 Sept →
nuke13–30.0914%1 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0120%24 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0020%24 Aug →
dust211–130.0015%24 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0221%7 Aug →
inferno13–16-0.0110%4 Aug →
overpass15–15-0.0212%3 Aug →
overpass13–100.0122%3 Aug →
train13–90.0647%30 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.