kloNdaik

kloNdaik — CS2 Stats

DE76561197971898700[U:1:11632972]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,493Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,509 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (57 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,509 → 1,509
+104Tracked matches · now 1,493
0.0ppWin rate · 56.7% → 56.7%

Rating over time

1,509Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-08-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,509
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 22 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-07
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-07

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkloNdaikFACEITLevel 6 · 1,509 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,509csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning65
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–46Last 10054%Win rateLLLWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.1pp headshot accuracy · +126ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 714ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 678ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 615ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility6.4
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 65% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 65% on T to 47% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning6.5
Utility6.4
Mechanics3.6
Opening Duels6.5
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time586ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 9–6 · poseidon, 28 Oct →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · cache, 22 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 12 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 7 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 84% over 19infernoWeakest map · 43% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2310–1343%-0.02
dust2B2010–1050%-0.01
nukeB1910–953%-0.00
ancientS1916–384%0.02
cacheA106–460%-0.02
vertigo—21–150%-0.01
mirage—20–20%-0.00
anubis—20–20%-0.03
eldorado—10–10%-0.07
debris—10–10%-0.07
poseidon—11–0100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,464Matches
50%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
79.3ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient10256%1.0616.7
Dust29844%0.9815.8
Nuke7749%1.0616.7
Inferno6739%0.9214.0
Anubis5044%1.0515.8
Vertigo1644%1.0616.3
Cache1553%0.8315.0
Mirage1533%0.8813.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.0%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
66.2%Counter-strafing
12.6°Preaim
550msReaction time
64.5%T opening success
47.1%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
8.81HE damage / grenade
14.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.6215° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
eldorado3–9-0.0724%28 Oct →
debris4–9-0.0719%28 Oct →
vertigo4–9-0.0233%28 Oct →
inferno9–3-0.0221%28 Oct →
poseidon9–60.1129%28 Oct →
nuke9–40.0320%28 Oct →
ancient13–80.0123%26 Oct →
nuke9–130.0222%26 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0429%26 Oct →
dust213–80.0039%25 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0427%25 Oct →
inferno13–60.0224%25 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0119%25 Oct →
nuke13–70.0122%25 Oct →
cache13–110.0121%25 Oct →
mirage10–130.0023%23 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0322%23 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0324%23 Oct →
nuke13–60.0916%23 Oct →
ancient13–60.0539%23 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0823%23 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0722%20 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0623%20 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0419%20 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0426%20 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0422%16 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0315%16 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0235%16 Oct →
ancient13–110.0123%16 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.073%16 Oct →
anubis7–130.0217%16 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0023%12 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0328%12 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0132%12 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0335%9 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0319%9 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0515%8 Oct →
inferno13–100.0129%8 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0328%8 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0427%8 Oct →
ancient13–70.0025%7 Oct →
ancient13–10.0729%7 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0517%6 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0021%6 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0128%6 Oct →
dust26–130.0033%3 Oct →
inferno12–160.0127%3 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0223%3 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0117%3 Oct →
dust25–13-0.1044%25 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0533%25 Sept →
inferno8–130.0118%25 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0829%23 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0326%23 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0133%23 Sept →
ancient13–80.0424%23 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0246%22 Sept →
dust213–70.0030%19 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0120%19 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0129%19 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0325%18 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0035%18 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0824%17 Sept →
dust210–130.0019%17 Sept →
nuke9–130.0321%17 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0319%17 Sept →
inferno8–130.0431%17 Sept →
inferno13–50.0439%15 Sept →
dust213–70.0738%15 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0318%14 Sept →
inferno13–60.0027%14 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0120%14 Sept →
nuke13–60.0520%14 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0411%11 Sept →
ancient13–70.0129%11 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0326%2 Sept →
cache6–130.0212%2 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0423%1 Sept →
dust213–90.0719%31 Aug →
nuke13–30.0426%31 Aug →
ancient19–170.0218%31 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0219%29 Aug →
nuke14–160.0234%29 Aug →
inferno11–130.0428%29 Aug →
dust213–50.0036%29 Aug →
dust213–60.0218%25 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0220%25 Aug →
cache16–12-0.0121%23 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0327%21 Aug →
inferno14–160.0223%21 Aug →
ancient13–70.0825%21 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0712%21 Aug →
ancient7–130.0225%21 Aug →
ancient13–110.0424%19 Aug →
nuke13–60.0431%19 Aug →
nuke13–90.0518%16 Aug →
ancient13–110.0216%16 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0023%14 Aug →
dust211–130.0127%13 Aug →
ancient13–100.0633%13 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.