Stigidi

Stigidi — CS2 Stats

FI76561197971276441[U:1:11010713]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,773Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,032Purple band · top ~16.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#99502 of 228553 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,250 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 3 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,032 -2,929 3 Jul19 Sept · 26 days played
16,34021,220peak 21,2203 Jul19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,250 +0 2 Sept19 Sept · 2 observations
1,2501,250peak 1,2502 Sept19 Sept
21,469Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,250Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-07-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,250
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 101 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,188 below peak (21,220)
  • +1,005 over 30 days · improving
  • -2,929 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,968 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStigidiFACEITLevel 6 · 1,250 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER18,032 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,250csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning47
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46522Last 10046%Win rateWWWLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 20

  • 1082 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility6.4
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.7
Utility6.4
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time595ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 652ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 5 Sept
35%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · dust2, 6 Aug
430msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · inferno, 11 Sept
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 17 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W3Current streak
710In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 50% over 24anubisWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C30121840%-0.00
infernoB24121250%-0.01
ancientB1991047%-0.02
anubisC135838%-0.01
nukeC73443%-0.02
mirage43175%-0.01
cache32167%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

759Matches
51%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
67.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient14351%1.0314.0
Dust210447%0.9913.6
Inferno10353%0.9412.4
Anubis6154%0.9514.1
Nuke3256%1.0412.9
Mirage2941%0.7411.4
Overpass1369%1.1315.6
Train757%0.9414.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
80.3%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
601msReaction time
29.1%T opening success
36.4%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
9.99HE damage / grenade
10.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.1159% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–10.0912%17 Sept
dust213–8-0.0110%15 Sept
inferno16–130.0329%15 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0311%14 Sept
inferno16–130.0615%13 Sept
dust26–13-0.0420%13 Sept
inferno13–20.0627%11 Sept
dust213–60.0122%11 Sept
dust28–13-0.0317%11 Sept
inferno13–16-0.0031%7 Sept
dust23–13-0.0221%7 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0215%7 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0412%6 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0821%6 Sept
dust213–40.1218%5 Sept
dust215–15-0.0619%4 Sept
inferno10–130.0120%4 Sept
dust215–15-0.0422%4 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0414%4 Sept
nuke13–90.0114%4 Sept
anubis7–130.0217%4 Sept
cache8–13-0.0513%3 Sept
inferno12–160.0032%3 Sept
anubis7–130.0511%3 Sept
ancient13–100.0913%2 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0410%2 Sept
inferno2–13-0.058%2 Sept
dust213–110.0128%2 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0611%26 Aug
dust213–4-0.0310%24 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0212%24 Aug
inferno14–16-0.039%22 Aug
ancient16–140.057%22 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0317%22 Aug
dust213–100.0516%22 Aug
nuke13–20.0322%21 Aug
ancient13–40.0521%21 Aug
anubis9–13-0.008%20 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0314%20 Aug
dust28–13-0.0511%13 Aug
ancient13–80.0015%13 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0211%12 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0914%12 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0013%10 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0312%10 Aug
dust25–13-0.0429%9 Aug
dust213–100.0211%8 Aug
cache13–11-0.0213%8 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0619%8 Aug
anubis13–11-0.097%8 Aug
dust214–160.0317%8 Aug
cache16–13-0.0316%7 Aug
inferno13–70.0212%7 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0313%6 Aug
dust28–13-0.0535%6 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0614%5 Aug
dust213–30.0121%5 Aug
inferno16–130.0414%5 Aug
inferno8–130.028%4 Aug
dust26–13-0.0311%4 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0710%4 Aug
ancient13–6-0.047%4 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0622%3 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0125%3 Aug
ancient16–14-0.028%2 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0120%2 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0013%1 Aug
inferno13–60.0410%1 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0015%1 Aug
mirage13–90.0617%1 Aug
anubis13–40.0414%1 Aug
anubis13–4-0.043%1 Aug
anubis3–13-0.1022%15 Jul
dust213–8-0.033%15 Jul
dust211–13-0.008%15 Jul
anubis13–60.1021%15 Jul
dust213–100.0113%14 Jul
ancient13–9-0.029%14 Jul
inferno9–130.0113%14 Jul
dust212–160.0717%14 Jul
dust211–13-0.0120%10 Jul
nuke6–13-0.057%10 Jul
dust213–90.0317%10 Jul
inferno2–13-0.097%10 Jul
dust27–13-0.0418%8 Jul
dust213–100.0321%8 Jul
dust28–130.0021%8 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0424%7 Jul
dust27–13-0.052%7 Jul
dust28–13-0.0220%6 Jul
nuke11–13-0.059%6 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0320%5 Jul
ancient6–13-0.1113%5 Jul
ancient6–13-0.032%5 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0219%4 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0414%3 Jul
anubis10–130.0214%3 Jul
inferno13–90.0118%3 Jul
dust26–130.0319%3 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0518%3 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →