vig

vig — CS2 Stats

NO76561197970173228[U:1:9907500]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,853Tracked matches63%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,403Top 25% of 210,832 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#28598 of 257905 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,173 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−177Faceit ELO · 2,350 → 2,173

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,403 +1,933 26 Sept – 25 Oct · 8 days played
22,47024,403peak 24,40326 Sept25 Oct
24,440Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,350Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-08-22

Faceit ELO

  • 177 below peak (2,350)
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 327 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-09
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-09

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 24,403
  • +1,933 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 597 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-10-05
  • Purple band first seen 2026-10-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGvigFACEITLevel 10 · 2,173 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,403 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,350csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning59
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–43Last 10057%Win rateLLWWWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 485ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 481ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 485ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility4.7
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels5.6
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 71% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 71% on T to 54% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.9
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels8.0
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time497ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 526ms → last ⅓ avg 497ms
Headshot accuracy26.7%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 26.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–0 · anubis, 1 Sept →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–9 · mirage, 26 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · nuke, 19 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 1 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
13–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 69% over 29mirageWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisS2920–969%0.03
infernoA2414–1058%0.02
mirageD134–931%0.01
nukeA138–562%0.02
cacheC125–742%0.01
ancientA85–363%-0.01
dust2—11–0100%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,988Matches
50%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
79.7ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage41048%1.0815.8
Ancient28148%1.0616.2
Inferno26652%1.1617.1
Anubis25553%1.1216.1
Nuke12642%1.1316.6
Overpass5357%1.1216.6
Train3949%1.0917.1
Cache2635%1.1819.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.5%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
496msReaction time
71.1%T opening success
54.1%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
13.3%Flash assists
10.59HE damage / grenade
4.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.383 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–130.0129%26 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0012%26 Oct →
cache13–100.0720%26 Oct →
inferno13–100.0329%25 Oct →
inferno13–50.1325%25 Oct →
anubis13–160.0116%18 Oct →
inferno9–130.0333%17 Oct →
anubis13–80.0621%17 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0216%17 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0212%17 Oct →
anubis13–20.0519%17 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0211%17 Oct →
inferno13–40.0424%10 Oct →
cache13–110.0421%10 Oct →
anubis13–70.0627%10 Oct →
anubis13–90.0522%5 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0127%5 Oct →
ancient10–130.0133%5 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0316%4 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0729%4 Oct →
cache13–100.0517%27 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0226%27 Sept →
inferno13–100.0536%27 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0323%27 Sept →
inferno13–110.1024%27 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0320%26 Sept →
inferno13–110.0725%26 Sept →
mirage2–90.06100%26 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0136%26 Sept →
inferno13–60.0527%22 Sept →
anubis13–60.0830%22 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0313%22 Sept →
mirage13–40.0563%20 Sept →
mirage13–110.0114%20 Sept →
anubis9–130.0624%20 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0321%20 Sept →
mirage8–130.0340%20 Sept →
nuke13–60.0758%19 Sept →
inferno16–140.0622%19 Sept →
nuke13–40.0321%19 Sept →
inferno9–6-0.0227%16 Sept →
inferno13–100.0638%15 Sept →
anubis13–80.0632%15 Sept →
anubis13–20.1522%14 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0522%14 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0430%13 Sept →
mirage13–110.0116%13 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0323%13 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0814%13 Sept →
mirage8–130.0816%12 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0727%12 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0021%12 Sept →
anubis13–80.0522%12 Sept →
ancient16–130.0425%12 Sept →
inferno23–250.0219%10 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0821%10 Sept →
inferno7–130.0038%10 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.1017%10 Sept →
nuke13–60.0727%10 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0124%8 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0611%8 Sept →
nuke10–130.0017%8 Sept →
anubis10–130.0015%7 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.1027%7 Sept →
anubis13–80.0116%7 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0515%6 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0018%6 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0528%6 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.0311%4 Sept →
cache7–130.0429%4 Sept →
inferno13–30.0431%1 Sept →
anubis13–00.2458%1 Sept →
inferno11–130.0422%1 Sept →
nuke13–30.0328%1 Sept →
anubis13–30.1922%1 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0115%31 Aug →
inferno13–110.1018%31 Aug →
anubis13–00.0720%31 Aug →
anubis13–80.0123%30 Aug →
cache13–16-0.0021%30 Aug →
nuke13–50.0313%30 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0014%29 Aug →
anubis13–50.0428%29 Aug →
cache13–70.0628%29 Aug →
nuke13–90.0322%29 Aug →
anubis16–140.0323%29 Aug →
inferno16–130.0014%29 Aug →
ancient13–110.0328%25 Aug →
mirage14–160.0418%25 Aug →
anubis13–100.0116%24 Aug →
inferno13–100.0429%24 Aug →
inferno10–130.0022%24 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0418%23 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0118%22 Aug →
nuke9–130.0120%22 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0127%22 Aug →
anubis13–110.1226%22 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0527%22 Aug →
cache1–13-0.0318%22 Aug →
anubis13–50.0125%22 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.