hoihoi

hoihoi — CS2 Stats

76561197967679265[U:1:7413537]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

2,083Tracked matches66%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating10,727Blue band · top ~51% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,727 +6,210 12 Aug – 4 Nov · 31 days played
4,51711,848peak 11,84812 Aug4 Nov
11,848Peak Premier in tracked matches
45Days played since 2026-07-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,121 below peak (11,848)
  • +834 over 30 days · improving
  • +6,210 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 4,273 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhoihoiPREMIER10,727 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning56
Utility77

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–36–7Last 10057%Win rateLWWWLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility7.7
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.5

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 63% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 77 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 58% on T to 38% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning5.6
Utility7.7
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time584ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 619ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 9 Aug →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · ancient, 7 Sept →
438msFastest reaction time · 9–6 · poseidon, 2 Nov →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 16 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 71% over 17dust2Weakest map · 39% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C187–1139%0.03
mirageS1712–571%0.01
anubisS1510–567%0.05
infernoB157–847%0.02
cacheA106–460%0.03
nukeS107–370%0.05
ancientA85–363%0.02
poseidon—11–0100%0.08
vertigo—10–10%-0.05
rush_001—10–10%-0.01
fachwerk—11–0100%0.05
office—11–0100%0.03
boulder—10–10%0.00
shelter—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
73.5%Counter-strafing
12.3°Preaim
588msReaction time
57.5%T opening success
37.5%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
17.85HE damage / grenade
12.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.3169° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache10–130.0915%4 Nov →
cache13–11-0.0217%2 Nov →
anubis13–80.0820%2 Nov →
poseidon9–60.0815%2 Nov →
dust210–130.0425%1 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0216%1 Nov →
mirage13–50.0316%1 Nov →
nuke7–13-0.0127%23 Oct →
inferno9–130.0721%23 Oct →
ancient13–90.069%21 Oct →
dust213–50.0920%21 Oct →
inferno16–12-0.0021%19 Oct →
dust210–7-0.0022%19 Oct →
mirage13–20.0517%18 Oct →
vertigo10–13-0.0513%18 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.029%18 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0424%18 Oct →
nuke13–50.1315%16 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0313%16 Oct →
mirage13–60.0714%16 Oct →
nuke13–60.0424%15 Oct →
rush_0015–8-0.0117%15 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0016%14 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0122%14 Oct →
nuke13–90.0924%14 Oct →
mirage13–40.0024%12 Oct →
anubis13–80.0614%12 Oct →
mirage13–80.0118%12 Oct →
inferno12–12-0.0529%4 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0417%4 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.0122%1 Oct →
dust213–50.0216%27 Sept →
anubis13–90.0111%27 Sept →
fachwerk13–100.0525%24 Sept →
anubis10–130.0811%23 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0412%23 Sept →
office13–70.0322%22 Sept →
cache16–130.0225%21 Sept →
boulder11–130.0012%20 Sept →
shelter12–12-0.0136%20 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0318%19 Sept →
dust213–110.0616%19 Sept →
dust22–7-0.0431%19 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0228%19 Sept →
cache13–70.0234%17 Sept →
mirage13–30.0215%16 Sept →
dust28–130.0018%16 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0114%16 Sept →
anubis13–00.0511%16 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0216%15 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0122%14 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0723%14 Sept →
nuke13–80.0713%13 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0023%13 Sept →
anubis3–130.0720%13 Sept →
dust214–160.0719%9 Sept →
nuke13–60.0825%9 Sept →
ancient13–40.0537%7 Sept →
mirage13–90.0316%7 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0825%6 Sept →
cache7–130.0125%5 Sept →
inferno13–110.0215%5 Sept →
cache4–130.0211%3 Sept →
inferno16–130.1217%3 Sept →
dust215–150.0214%2 Sept →
mirage16–130.0714%2 Sept →
dust213–70.0621%2 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.019%31 Aug →
dust213–20.0036%31 Aug →
anubis10–130.0528%31 Aug →
cache13–50.1225%28 Aug →
cache13–30.0518%28 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0011%28 Aug →
dust213–60.0720%27 Aug →
ancient13–40.0213%27 Aug →
anubis13–110.0425%25 Aug →
cache13–4-0.0021%25 Aug →
mirage13–30.0222%25 Aug →
dust215–150.1123%24 Aug →
anubis10–130.0427%24 Aug →
nuke13–80.0623%24 Aug →
anubis13–110.0421%23 Aug →
nuke13–00.0626%23 Aug →
inferno15–150.0816%23 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0433%12 Aug →
ancient13–10.1116%12 Aug →
mirage7–130.0422%12 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0320%10 Aug →
anubis13–110.0718%10 Aug →
inferno13–20.2520%9 Aug →
dust215–150.0526%9 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0423%6 Aug →
anubis13–90.0520%6 Aug →
nuke11–130.0517%4 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0215%3 Aug →
anubis13–100.0924%3 Aug →
inferno9–130.0219%2 Aug →
inferno13–100.0119%2 Aug →
mirage9–130.0121%31 Jul →
dust28–130.0523%31 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.