Tsm𝔸ck — CS2 Stats

76561197967049464[U:1:6783736]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,064Tracked matches71%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport

Premier CS Rating18,030Purple band · top ~16.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#108840 of 252834 tracked

FaceitLevel 6 · 1,320 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,030 +1,716 1 May – 17 Oct · 37 days played

Faceit ELO: 1,320 +0 28 Aug – 4 Oct · 3 observations

18,030Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,320Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

48Days played since 2026-05-01

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,320
0 over 30 days · steady
Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 31 to go
Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 18,030
+4,731 over 30 days · improving
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,970 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Blue band first seen 2026-08-28
Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71

Positioning45

Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–45–4Last 10051%Win rateWWWWLWWTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −3.6pp headshot accuracy · +35ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

4–1 · 80% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 11%
Avg reaction 533ms

Last 10

7–2–1 · 70% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 14%
Avg reaction 581ms

Last 20

15–4–1 · 75% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 563ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+4.3 against its own average).

Aim7.1

Utility7.6

Positioning4.5

Opening Duels0.9

Clutch0.2

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1

Positioning4.5

Utility7.6

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels1.2

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time571ms−122ms

first ⅓ avg 693ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms

Headshot accuracy16.4%+0.1%

first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 30 Jul →

42%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · nuke, 24 Aug →

461msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · dust2, 8 Oct →

13–3Biggest win · dust2, 2 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak

W4Current streak

5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 69% over 16ancientWeakest map · 27% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	22	9–13	41%	-0.01
nuke	A	18	10–8	56%	-0.01
inferno	S	16	11–5	69%	0.01
mirage	S	12	8–4	67%	0.01
cache	A	11	6–5	55%	0.02
ancient	D	11	3–8	27%	-0.02
anubis	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,594Matches

49%Win rate

1.09Avg K/D

66.5ADR

37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

21%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	13	54%	1.18	12.9
Mirage	12	58%	0.83	12.1
Ancient	10	70%	0.76	12.6
Anubis	9	78%	0.74	16.0
Dust2	8	12%	0.59	8.5
Overpass	4	75%	1.53	16.3
Vertigo	3	33%	1.15	16.3
Nuke	2	0%	0.88	13.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy

37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.3%Spray accuracy

78.7%Counter-strafing

10.8°Preaim

570msReaction time

33.9%T opening success

35.6%CT opening success

0.64Enemies flashed / flash

4.2%Flash assists

12.85HE damage / grenade

15.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.9064% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	16–13	0.05	14%	17 Oct →
nuke	16–13	0.01	11%	17 Oct →
inferno	13–4	-0.02	8%	17 Oct →
cache	13–8	-0.05	13%	16 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	10%	14 Oct →
cache	13–4	0.05	21%	14 Oct →
ancient	13–10	-0.06	23%	14 Oct →
anubis	15–15	-0.02	7%	12 Oct →
anubis	1–13	-0.08	29%	8 Oct →
inferno	13–6	0.10	10%	8 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.02	29%	8 Oct →
anubis	13–8	-0.00	13%	8 Oct →
nuke	13–7	-0.03	13%	8 Oct →
ancient	13–6	0.07	14%	7 Oct →
dust2	16–12	-0.04	17%	7 Oct →
cache	13–7	0.04	20%	5 Oct →
inferno	10–13	0.01	19%	2 Oct →
dust2	13–3	0.09	17%	2 Oct →
cache	13–16	0.05	23%	2 Oct →
mirage	13–6	0.01	16%	2 Oct →
nuke	11–13	0.02	19%	2 Oct →
cache	13–4	-0.01	8%	30 Sept →
dust2	13–5	0.05	8%	23 Sept →
dust2	0–13	-0.09	40%	22 Sept →
mirage	15–15	0.00	24%	22 Sept →
inferno	13–9	0.00	19%	21 Sept →
ancient	5–13	-0.06	16%	19 Sept →
inferno	8–13	-0.00	10%	18 Sept →
dust2	13–8	0.01	14%	18 Sept →
mirage	13–8	0.06	9%	16 Sept →
anubis	6–13	-0.01	13%	16 Sept →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	16%	16 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.02	17%	16 Sept →
nuke	13–5	-0.02	16%	15 Sept →
mirage	13–10	0.00	11%	15 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.00	21%	10 Sept →
nuke	13–8	-0.02	28%	10 Sept →
inferno	13–4	0.00	13%	9 Sept →
inferno	9–13	0.01	23%	2 Sept →
ancient	13–7	-0.03	15%	2 Sept →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	29%	2 Sept →
mirage	13–7	0.05	25%	2 Sept →
cache	11–13	0.02	9%	27 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.12	13%	27 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.01	19%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.03	15%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	21%	27 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.00	11%	25 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.00	7%	25 Aug →
nuke	16–14	0.05	20%	24 Aug →
nuke	1–13	-0.05	42%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–4	-0.01	24%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.03	20%	24 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	16%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.01	12%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.03	16%	23 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	6%	21 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	12%	21 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	19%	21 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.04	17%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–16	0.02	14%	21 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.00	13%	21 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.02	12%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.04	11%	19 Aug →
dust2	12–16	-0.00	11%	11 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.04	19%	8 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.01	13%	7 Aug →
dust2	0–4	-0.04	0%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.00	21%	7 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.02	17%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	7%	6 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	7%	6 Aug →
nuke	1–6	-0.02	20%	5 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.01	19%	5 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.08	15%	5 Aug →
dust2	16–14	-0.00	18%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.04	15%	4 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.07	7%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	12%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.02	21%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.11	26%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.05	22%	30 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.02	22%	23 Jul →
dust2	14–16	0.01	21%	23 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	18%	21 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.08	22%	14 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.04	27%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	13%	24 Jun →
mirage	16–14	0.01	19%	18 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	10%	16 May →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	13%	16 May →
mirage	9–13	0.00	19%	11 May →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	16%	10 May →
inferno	13–6	-0.03	40%	10 May →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	17%	9 May →
ancient	5–13	-0.07	6%	5 May →
nuke	13–4	0.05	6%	5 May →
ancient	15–15	-0.03	22%	2 May →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	16%	1 May →
nuke	9–13	-0.08	6%	1 May →