LoSo — CS2 Stats

76561197961232013[U:1:966285]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,716Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating28,556Top 5% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#53 of 3211 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,263 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

28,556Peak Premier on CSDB

2,263Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,263
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 237 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 28,556
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 1,444 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-08-28
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Performance scores

Aim80

Positioning50

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–48–7Last 10045%Win rateWLWWLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0

Aggression5.2

Utility5.8

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels1.0

Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0

Positioning5.0

Utility5.8

Mechanics6.0

Opening Duels1.4

Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time589ms−34ms

first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms

Headshot accuracy19.7%+1.2%

first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — dust2 13–10

13–2Biggest win — nuke

5Longest win streak

6–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 27% over 30

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	D	30	8–22	27%	0.01
inferno	S	18	12–6	67%	0.00
cache	C	15	6–9	40%	0.03
anubis	D	12	4–8	33%	-0.00
nuke	B	12	6–6	50%	0.02
ancient	A	7	4–3	57%	0.04
mirage	S	6	5–1	83%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 30). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,110Matches

49%Win rate

1.04Avg K/D

79.9ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	305	52%	1.07	15.8
Inferno	290	52%	1.12	16.2
Ancient	258	49%	1.05	16.1
Anubis	182	46%	1.03	16.0
Mirage	167	44%	0.92	14.1
Nuke	134	54%	1.16	16.5
Overpass	32	44%	1.07	17.1
Vertigo	24	33%	0.88	13.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy

40.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.2%Spray accuracy

77.0%Counter-strafing

10.2°Preaim

583msReaction time

26.3%T opening success

41.4%CT opening success

0.46Enemies flashed / flash

6.1%Flash assists

7.96HE damage / grenade

11.60Flashes / match

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–8	0.02	17%	28 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	25%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.03	15%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.05	32%	28 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	15%	28 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.00	24%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.05	22%	27 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.03	18%	27 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.06	14%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	18%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–16	0.02	27%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.06	23%	26 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.01	27%	26 Aug →
anubis	2–11	-0.01	20%	26 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.08	18%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.03	18%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.15	18%	26 Aug →
mirage	11–5	-0.01	19%	24 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	18%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–4	-0.02	23%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	18%	24 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.00	17%	23 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.04	16%	22 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.00	12%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.07	13%	22 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	23%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.02	27%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.05	27%	22 Aug →
dust2	14–16	0.02	13%	22 Aug →
cache	0–13	-0.05	25%	22 Aug →
anubis	15–15	0.05	18%	22 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	19%	22 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.07	14%	21 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.01	28%	20 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.06	8%	20 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.02	20%	20 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.02	18%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	26%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	25%	19 Aug →
dust2	16–12	0.03	23%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.03	14%	19 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.02	22%	18 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.02	24%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	16%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.18	21%	17 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	11%	17 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.06	22%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.05	12%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–4	-0.06	11%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.03	10%	17 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	11%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.02	22%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.03	12%	16 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.02	26%	16 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.06	24%	15 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.04	17%	15 Aug →
nuke	16–13	0.00	18%	15 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.09	14%	15 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.06	21%	15 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	23%	15 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.07	28%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.03	26%	15 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	14%	14 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.00	13%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.02	16%	14 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.02	29%	14 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.03	15%	14 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.03	7%	12 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.00	16%	12 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.10	18%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.03	25%	12 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	21%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.05	21%	12 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.03	13%	11 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.00	14%	9 Aug →
cache	16–12	0.02	18%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	24%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.04	19%	9 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	18%	9 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.02	24%	9 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	18%	8 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.05	13%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.11	19%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.11	22%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.10	16%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.09	22%	8 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.03	11%	8 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	21%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	12%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.05	32%	6 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.07	29%	6 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.06	14%	6 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.03	17%	6 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.10	14%	6 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.06	27%	6 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.02	23%	6 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.05	10%	6 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.17	18%	5 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.02	16%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.03	16%	4 Aug →