-bl4ckiE-

-bl4ckiE- — CS2 Stats

DE76561197965885556[U:1:5619828]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

685Tracked matches32%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,415Hours in CS33Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,000Purple band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 824 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,000 +0 5 Oct – 25 Oct · 10 days played
14,99915,642peak 15,6425 Oct25 Oct
16,177Peak Premier in tracked matches
824Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-09-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 824
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 77 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 642 below peak (15,642)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate43.6%44.8%45.7%2.1% short
Shot accuracy2.9%12.4%12.7%9.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.361.031.05above
Match win rate50.0%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG-bl4ckiE-FACEITLevel 6 · 824 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER15,000 · Purple bandPEAK ELO824csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning64
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44–50–6Last 10044%Win rateTWLWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +3.9pp headshot accuracy · +67ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 10

  • 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 20

  • 5–14–1 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility6.3
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch5.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 57% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning6.4
Utility6.3
Mechanics1.5
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time562ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 557ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%+3.9%
first ⅓ avg 14.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 31 Oct →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · inferno, 31 Oct →
344msFastest reaction time · 7–9 · inferno, 25 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 20 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
6–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 9ancientWeakest map · 28% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB4421–2348%0.01
ancientD185–1328%-0.00
dust2C146–843%0.01
nukeB105–550%0.03
mirageS96–367%0.02
anubis—41–325%0.04
train—10–10%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (28% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

47,585Lifetime kills
1.36K/D · Top 10% of Level 6 players
2,728Matches
50.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 6 players
43.6%Headshot %
2.9%Shot accuracy
4,472MVPs
857Hours (in match)
1,963Bombs planted
624Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4712,179
AWP8,114
FAMAS1,583
MP91,224
AUG1,194

Lifetime map wins

5,904dust2
3,519inferno
1,925nuke
803vertigo
490train
468office
189italy
107assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

111Matches
50%Win rate
1.32Avg K/D
83.8ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient2759%1.2217.1
Inferno2152%1.2514.8
Mirage1844%1.0814.7
Dust21638%1.5517.6
Nuke1450%1.4320.3
Anubis1250%1.3618.0
Overpass333%2.1419.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
56.9%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
547msReaction time
52.0%T opening success
45.1%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
12.18HE damage / grenade
6.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

28% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis12–120.0324%31 Oct →
inferno9–10.1836%31 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.1023%29 Oct →
inferno9–30.0818%29 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0720%28 Oct →
inferno11–130.0320%28 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.0235%28 Oct →
inferno11–130.0017%27 Oct →
inferno4–9-0.1217%27 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.1210%27 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0321%26 Oct →
ancient20–220.0218%26 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0017%25 Oct →
inferno9–7-0.0521%25 Oct →
anubis7–130.0324%25 Oct →
dust213–40.0710%25 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.0426%25 Oct →
dust216–12-0.037%25 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.0518%25 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.1917%25 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0623%24 Oct →
nuke13–70.0316%24 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0318%24 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.009%23 Oct →
inferno13–100.0421%23 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.019%23 Oct →
mirage12–160.0013%21 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.0014%21 Oct →
ancient12–120.0212%21 Oct →
dust213–10.0935%20 Oct →
inferno9–10.1818%20 Oct →
inferno8–80.0013%20 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.047%19 Oct →
inferno9–60.0334%19 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0312%18 Oct →
train3–13-0.0726%18 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0219%18 Oct →
anubis11–130.0310%18 Oct →
inferno9–20.1421%18 Oct →
ancient6–130.0114%17 Oct →
inferno13–50.0923%17 Oct →
inferno13–110.055%16 Oct →
mirage13–110.0122%16 Oct →
inferno9–7-0.036%16 Oct →
dust29–130.0117%16 Oct →
inferno5–9-0.0715%16 Oct →
inferno6–90.0115%16 Oct →
nuke7–130.0919%15 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0419%15 Oct →
inferno9–50.0531%15 Oct →
anubis13–40.0816%14 Oct →
inferno9–1-0.088%14 Oct →
inferno7–2-0.080%14 Oct →
dust213–90.0510%14 Oct →
ancient5–130.065%14 Oct →
nuke13–80.0123%14 Oct →
dust213–3-0.0026%14 Oct →
inferno9–50.0711%14 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.059%13 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.045%13 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0112%13 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.1210%13 Oct →
inferno9–40.0913%13 Oct →
dust21–13-0.046%12 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.039%12 Oct →
dust211–13-0.019%12 Oct →
ancient13–50.077%12 Oct →
inferno14–160.0125%12 Oct →
inferno9–40.1719%12 Oct →
mirage13–60.038%12 Oct →
mirage13–80.0211%12 Oct →
ancient13–90.0223%11 Oct →
dust210–130.0617%11 Oct →
inferno13–50.0719%11 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.0011%11 Oct →
inferno13–60.0814%11 Oct →
mirage13–100.0313%11 Oct →
ancient13–110.0413%10 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0215%10 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0429%10 Oct →
nuke9–130.018%10 Oct →
inferno9–10.1818%10 Oct →
dust213–60.0412%9 Oct →
nuke13–100.1318%9 Oct →
inferno13–70.035%9 Oct →
inferno8–80.0415%9 Oct →
mirage13–40.033%7 Oct →
ancient13–60.0011%7 Oct →
mirage13–90.0317%6 Oct →
inferno8–80.0114%6 Oct →
ancient13–50.014%5 Oct →
ancient10–130.0313%5 Oct →
nuke7–130.0316%4 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0821%3 Oct →
dust211–130.0211%3 Oct →
inferno13–80.0814%2 Oct →
ancient12–120.0321%2 Oct →
inferno9–130.0415%30 Sept →
mirage11–130.0616%30 Sept →
nuke9–130.0111%29 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.