eobz_-

eobz_- — CS2 Stats

US76561197965803314[U:1:5537586]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,988Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,928Top 10% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13312 of 252679 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,928 -625 18 Dec – 14 Oct · 33 days played
25,53427,667peak 27,66718 Dec14 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,980 +0 31 Aug – 1 Sept · 2 observations
1,9801,980peak 1,98031 Aug1 Sept
27,667Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,980Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
62Days played since 2025-12-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,980
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 21 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,739 below peak (27,667)
  • +365 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,072 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGeobz_-PREMIER25,928 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,980csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning53
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–43–2Last 10055%Win rateLLWLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · +47ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 496ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility6.0
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.3
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time496ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 526ms → last ⅓ avg 496ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–7 · overpass, 8 Apr →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · mirage, 11 Feb →
313msFastest reaction time · 9–2 · inferno, 15 Apr →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 11 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 7mirageWeakest map · 44% over 34
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3415–1944%0.01
dust2A1710–759%0.01
infernoS1510–567%0.00
anubisB105–550%0.03
overpassA95–456%0.03
nukeS75–271%0.02
cacheA53–260%-0.01
ancient—32–167%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 34). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,676Matches
52%Win rate
1.40Avg K/D
77.8ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis11350%1.2315.9
Mirage9948%1.2417.3
Inferno9052%1.1615.9
Nuke8552%1.2716.8
Dust23642%1.3418.4
Vertigo3531%1.1316.1
Ancient2635%1.2217.7
Overpass2236%1.1517.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
494msReaction time
24.3%T opening success
45.3%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
9.5%Flash assists
7.91HE damage / grenade
10.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.2577% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 34 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–13-0.0336%14 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0914%9 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.025%9 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0431%7 Oct →
dust213–100.0320%7 Oct →
mirage13–80.0519%19 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0323%21 Aug →
dust213–60.0912%19 Aug →
inferno13–70.0526%16 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0123%16 Aug →
anubis16–130.0213%16 Aug →
cache13–60.0019%14 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0217%12 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0616%12 Aug →
inferno10–30.0317%8 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0820%7 Aug →
dust215–150.0234%7 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0621%5 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.0524%5 Aug →
mirage15–150.0220%24 Jul →
dust26–130.0123%22 Jul →
cache13–5-0.039%22 Jul →
inferno13–50.0417%17 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0120%17 Jul →
cache13–5-0.0425%17 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0119%15 Jul →
mirage13–20.0525%15 Jul →
dust213–70.0933%10 Jul →
cache13–160.0117%10 Jul →
anubis13–100.1335%3 Jul →
inferno13–40.0319%26 Jun →
mirage7–130.0217%26 Jun →
nuke10–130.0225%26 Jun →
inferno13–7-0.0622%25 Jun →
nuke13–5-0.0019%24 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0814%24 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0433%21 Jun →
anubis13–20.0630%21 Jun →
dust24–13-0.0820%21 Jun →
mirage14–160.0320%20 Jun →
overpass13–80.0427%20 Jun →
mirage13–60.0915%20 Jun →
anubis9–130.0123%25 May →
mirage13–80.0114%22 May →
dust213–11-0.0322%20 May →
dust213–110.0426%16 May →
dust25–130.0112%15 May →
dust23–130.0115%6 May →
inferno13–100.0439%2 May →
anubis13–40.1034%2 May →
dust213–50.0818%1 May →
mirage14–16-0.0120%29 Apr →
mirage13–160.0527%24 Apr →
overpass13–4-0.0133%22 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.0526%17 Apr →
nuke13–6-0.0322%15 Apr →
inferno9–2-0.0015%15 Apr →
mirage13–90.0316%10 Apr →
overpass13–70.1711%8 Apr →
inferno1–13-0.0511%3 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.0126%3 Apr →
dust213–60.0127%3 Apr →
nuke13–70.0121%1 Apr →
mirage8–130.0619%1 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0117%1 Apr →
ancient13–110.0523%25 Mar →
mirage13–100.0120%25 Mar →
overpass9–13-0.0324%25 Mar →
anubis6–130.0218%27 Feb →
mirage13–8-0.0311%27 Feb →
overpass13–100.0531%25 Feb →
inferno13–70.0217%25 Feb →
nuke13–50.0926%20 Feb →
mirage1–13-0.0429%18 Feb →
inferno13–4-0.038%13 Feb →
mirage13–10.0942%11 Feb →
mirage13–60.0920%6 Feb →
anubis11–130.0318%4 Feb →
mirage13–90.0414%4 Feb →
mirage13–30.0814%30 Jan →
mirage11–13-0.005%28 Jan →
anubis13–100.046%23 Jan →
mirage7–13-0.0322%14 Jan →
nuke13–90.0629%13 Jan →
overpass13–70.0520%13 Jan →
overpass3–130.0320%13 Jan →
overpass3–130.0131%7 Jan →
inferno13–110.0825%7 Jan →
dust213–50.0329%3 Jan →
inferno7–13-0.0116%3 Jan →
dust213–50.0523%3 Jan →
mirage13–11-0.0129%29 Dec →
mirage4–130.0015%28 Dec →
dust24–12-0.0411%27 Dec →
ancient13–7-0.0326%18 Dec →
mirage9–130.0238%18 Dec →
overpass10–13-0.046%18 Dec →
mirage10–13-0.0128%14 Dec →
ancient11–130.0126%12 Dec →
inferno14–160.0125%12 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.