EasTor

EasTor — CS2 Stats

76561197963726088[U:1:3460360]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,803Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,983 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,983 → 2,983
+8Tracked matches · now 1,803
0.0ppWin rate · 36.7% → 36.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 62 days played since 10 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,530 +2,953 20 Apr6 Jul · 30 days played
25,57729,504peak 29,50420 Apr6 Jul
Faceit ELO: 2,983 +0 11 Sept16 Sept · 3 observations
2,9832,983peak 2,98311 Sept16 Sept
29,847Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,983Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
62Days played since 2026-02-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,983
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 17 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-11
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEasTorFACEITLevel 10 · 2,983 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,983csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning54
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5743Last 10057%Win rateLLWWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.9pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 476ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility7.1
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.4
Utility7.1
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact0.6

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time533ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 542ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms
Headshot accuracy24.7%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 24.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–4 · overpass, 13 Apr
42%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · ancient, 17 Aug
391msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · dust2, 11 Aug
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 6 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA25151060%0.05
ancientA2213959%0.04
mirageS1611569%0.06
dust2C125742%0.02
anubisD92722%0.06
nukeA74357%0.02
overpassS65183%0.10
cache32167%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,868Matches
57%Win rate
1.27Avg K/D
79.2ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage28051%1.1116.4
Ancient21956%1.1616.9
Inferno19754%1.2116.9
Nuke13054%1.2618.1
Dust210546%1.0516.5
Anubis7757%1.0516.3
Overpass5254%1.2517.7
Cache2966%1.1715.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.0%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
533msReaction time
26.5%T opening success
44.9%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
13.9%Flash assists
15.10HE damage / grenade
9.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.5404% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage3–130.0613%16 Sept
mirage17–19-0.0323%1 Sept
inferno13–80.0132%25 Aug
inferno13–80.0116%25 Aug
ancient14–160.0124%23 Aug
dust213–30.0516%20 Aug
cache4–13-0.0417%18 Aug
ancient6–130.0442%17 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0326%16 Aug
dust213–110.0115%11 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0516%10 Aug
dust25–13-0.0129%8 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0226%8 Aug
inferno14–160.0734%8 Aug
inferno19–150.0527%7 Aug
cache16–12-0.0215%7 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0126%7 Aug
ancient13–70.0822%7 Aug
inferno13–10.1717%6 Aug
ancient13–110.0622%3 Aug
dust24–130.0421%3 Aug
ancient8–130.0432%3 Aug
inferno6–130.0032%23 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0130%21 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0138%9 Jul
dust29–13-0.0119%9 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0117%8 Jul
dust210–130.0327%7 Jul
inferno13–60.0440%6 Jul
inferno9–130.0032%1 Jul
dust29–13-0.0427%30 Jun
dust28–13-0.0316%30 Jun
inferno11–130.0328%29 Jun
anubis5–130.0726%24 Jun
mirage13–70.0927%23 Jun
inferno10–130.0017%20 Jun
mirage13–40.0517%20 Jun
mirage13–30.0520%20 Jun
inferno13–110.0534%15 Jun
mirage13–40.0612%15 Jun
dust213–80.0738%14 Jun
overpass13–10.0935%14 Jun
ancient11–130.0113%12 Jun
ancient13–10.1217%12 Jun
nuke13–3-0.0019%11 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0110%8 Jun
ancient13–90.0422%7 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0025%4 Jun
ancient13–60.0824%2 Jun
inferno13–20.1438%1 Jun
nuke13–40.1419%1 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0117%1 Jun
overpass13–50.0917%1 Jun
mirage13–110.0830%27 May
ancient13–40.0638%27 May
mirage16–140.0929%26 May
anubis10–130.0723%25 May
mirage13–30.0924%25 May
inferno13–40.0713%25 May
nuke3–13-0.0725%18 May
mirage9–130.1325%18 May
inferno4–130.0630%17 May
anubis3–130.1022%17 May
mirage10–130.0628%17 May
cache13–80.0811%16 May
anubis11–130.0937%15 May
nuke16–130.0734%14 May
mirage13–60.0531%13 May
nuke5–130.0127%9 May
overpass13–50.1131%9 May
nuke16–140.0016%7 May
ancient10–13-0.0113%7 May
ancient13–40.1121%5 May
ancient13–9-0.0117%29 Apr
overpass13–60.1021%29 Apr
inferno7–130.0317%28 Apr
inferno16–130.0622%24 Apr
ancient7–130.0214%24 Apr
inferno3–130.0114%23 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0010%23 Apr
dust213–80.0924%22 Apr
inferno13–100.1017%22 Apr
ancient13–40.1529%22 Apr
ancient13–50.0730%21 Apr
mirage13–90.0918%21 Apr
ancient13–80.1415%20 Apr
dust213–70.0620%20 Apr
anubis5–130.0426%20 Apr
inferno13–60.1721%20 Apr
overpass13–40.2129%13 Apr
mirage13–60.0722%13 Apr
inferno13–100.0032%9 Apr
anubis13–90.0120%9 Apr
inferno13–50.1026%8 Apr
inferno13–10.059%8 Apr
ancient16–14-0.0320%1 Apr
dust28–13-0.0230%29 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0233%4 Mar
inferno16–14-0.0229%18 Feb
anubis5–30.1933%10 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →