XAN1

XAN1 — CS2 Stats

DE76561197962758994[U:1:2493266]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,267Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,005Hours in CS19Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,000Top 25% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20735 of 247886 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,000 +599 11 Jul – 30 Sept · 21 days played
24,40126,355peak 26,35511 Jul30 Sept
26,771Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-07-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,355 below peak (26,355)
  • +481 over 30 days · improving
  • +599 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches360—
Win rate58%——
K/D0.56——
Headshot %40%——

Measured 22 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; previous 18 Sep 2026 → 22 Sep 2026.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches51——
Win rate63%——
K/D0.57——
Headshot %42%——

Measured 1 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,745), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate51.7%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy11.0%13.0%13.3%2.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.851.061.070.22 short
Match win rate48.0%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGXAN1FACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,000 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning40
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–42–7Last 10051%Win rateLLLWWTWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.4pp headshot accuracy · −49ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 20

  • 12–6–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility5.7
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch5.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 99% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.0
Utility5.7
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time529ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 529ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 11–13 · ancient, 20 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · dust2, 18 Jul →
344msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · dust2, 13 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 20 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
4–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 83% over 12anubisWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C4015–2538%-0.02
cacheB189–950%-0.01
mirageS1210–283%-0.02
anubisC114–736%-0.01
nukeS86–275%0.01
infernoS65–183%0.02
ancient—41–325%0.05
overpass—11–0100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

187,636Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
9,256Matches
48.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
51.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
11.0%Shot accuracy
22,715MVPs
6,218Hours (in match)
12,085Bombs planted
1,587Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4751,841
AWP23,185
P25011,027
MAG-75,512
MP74,865
SSG 083,086

Lifetime map wins

38,164dust2
20,860inferno
5,222vertigo
3,298nuke
1,104cbble
717train
177dust
52aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

363Matches
51%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
88.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4159%0.9916.1
Anubis2658%0.9813.2
Inferno2143%1.1714.7
Dust22065%1.4415.6
Vertigo1638%0.9014.0
Overpass714%0.8414.3
Ancient757%0.9114.3
Nuke540%1.0016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
69.8%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
538msReaction time
35.8%T opening success
42.3%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
10.40HE damage / grenade
9.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.8124% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache2–130.023%30 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0217%30 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0212%30 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0612%29 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0616%16 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0330%16 Sept →
inferno13–40.0017%16 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0825%15 Sept →
dust26–1-0.0231%15 Sept →
mirage13–20.0611%15 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0712%15 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0517%14 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0125%14 Sept →
cache13–90.0321%14 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0118%2 Sept →
overpass4–00.0827%2 Sept →
cache13–20.0427%2 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0511%2 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0314%1 Sept →
dust29–130.0315%1 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0015%28 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0414%14 Aug →
dust29–130.0225%14 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0318%13 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0631%13 Aug →
inferno8–80.0429%13 Aug →
inferno9–40.0524%12 Aug →
inferno9–5-0.0121%12 Aug →
inferno9–30.0338%12 Aug →
dust210–130.0117%11 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0226%11 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0726%28 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0319%28 Jul →
cache13–100.0420%28 Jul →
cache13–3-0.006%27 Jul →
dust216–12-0.0327%27 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0414%27 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0328%27 Jul →
nuke13–50.0027%24 Jul →
cache5–130.0133%24 Jul →
anubis0–30.000%24 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0633%24 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0522%24 Jul →
dust26–13-0.066%23 Jul →
ancient13–10.0342%23 Jul →
mirage16–12-0.0336%23 Jul →
dust22–13-0.0538%23 Jul →
ancient11–130.1314%20 Jul →
cache13–00.000%20 Jul →
ancient10–130.039%20 Jul →
mirage16–14-0.0817%19 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0318%19 Jul →
anubis0–13-0.070%19 Jul →
dust21–13-0.0850%18 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0524%18 Jul →
dust22–13-0.0730%18 Jul →
cache13–3-0.016%18 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0222%18 Jul →
anubis13–30.0226%17 Jul →
cache13–30.0415%17 Jul →
mirage12–16-0.0017%17 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.0015%17 Jul →
dust212–12-0.0615%15 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0323%15 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0123%14 Jul →
nuke12–10.0520%14 Jul →
cache13–10.0214%14 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0319%14 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.072%13 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0525%13 Jul →
dust20–13-0.010%13 Jul →
mirage13–100.0017%13 Jul →
dust216–130.0423%12 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0221%12 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0123%12 Jul →
anubis13–30.0513%12 Jul →
mirage13–110.0018%12 Jul →
dust28–130.0020%12 Jul →
anubis11–130.0118%12 Jul →
mirage13–110.0136%12 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.087%11 Jul →
dust213–60.0923%11 Jul →
anubis13–60.0416%11 Jul →
nuke15–150.0526%11 Jul →
dust213–80.0226%11 Jul →
mirage13–40.0126%11 Jul →
dust213–30.0817%11 Jul →
dust28–130.0730%11 Jul →
nuke13–100.0115%10 Jul →
anubis13–50.0416%10 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0133%10 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0330%10 Jul →
ancient10–130.0022%10 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0535%10 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0218%10 Jul →
dust213–40.0621%10 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0216%10 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0312%10 Jul →
dust213–16-0.0123%9 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0134%9 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.