eMeSs

eMeSs — CS2 Stats

FR76561197962128515[U:1:1862787]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,179Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,911Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,032 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (70 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,032 → 2,032
+93Tracked matches · now 2,179
+29.8ppWin rate · 22.2% → 52.0%

Rating over time

2,032Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-08-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,032
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 468 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate49.2%50.9%
Shot accuracy13.5%13.7%
Kill/death ratio0.951.09
Match win rate48.2%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGeMeSsFACEITLevel 10 · 2,032 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,032csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning54
Utility77

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–44–12Last 10044%Win rateWLTLLTWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +5.5pp headshot accuracy · −7ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Last 10

  • 4–4–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 20

  • 8–8–4 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility7.7
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch5.0

Sharp aimerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Utility. Utility score of 77 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 47% on T to 31% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.4
Utility7.7
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact5.7

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time579ms+30ms
first ⅓ avg 548ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%+3.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 7–0 · cache, 26 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 7–8 · rush_001, 28 Sept →
367msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 17 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 19 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 16anubisWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C3012–1840%0.01
nukeS1612–475%0.01
cacheA159–660%0.02
infernoD144–1029%0.02
mirageD123–925%0.02
anubisD102–820%-0.00
ancient—22–0100%0.04
rush_001—10–10%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

139,636Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
6,646Matches
48.2%Match win rate
49.2%Headshot %
13.5%Shot accuracy
14,508MVPs
3,491Hours (in match)
10,836Bombs planted
2,141Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4744,061
AWP11,776
MP95,153
MAC-104,394
FAMAS3,737

Lifetime map wins

15,858inferno
14,436dust2
8,125nuke
5,573vertigo
3,337train
997cbble
14lake
13safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,764Matches
52%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
70.4ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust25958%1.0614.1
Inferno5857%1.0813.8
Anubis4939%0.9012.5
Mirage2854%1.0013.4
Nuke2638%0.8412.0
Ancient2264%0.9212.6
Vertigo850%0.8212.4
Cache771%0.9011.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
49.2%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
585msReaction time
47.0%T opening success
30.8%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
13.17HE damage / grenade
14.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 30.769% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–20.1137%9 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0126%7 Nov →
inferno12–12-0.0623%6 Nov →
anubis4–13-0.0020%6 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0313%6 Nov →
inferno12–120.0822%5 Nov →
mirage4–00.0943%5 Nov →
dust29–13-0.0021%5 Nov →
cache13–8-0.0422%2 Nov →
nuke16–12-0.0028%2 Nov →
nuke13–100.0329%2 Nov →
dust212–120.0123%2 Nov →
dust213–110.0319%2 Nov →
anubis1–13-0.0713%2 Nov →
dust213–10-0.0025%2 Nov →
cache12–120.0415%1 Nov →
mirage7–130.0613%1 Nov →
cache13–110.0720%1 Nov →
nuke1–13-0.0218%29 Oct →
dust24–130.0225%29 Oct →
anubis12–120.0319%29 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0716%29 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0219%29 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0228%29 Oct →
mirage4–130.0219%29 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0311%26 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0018%26 Oct →
cache7–00.2120%26 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0613%22 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0416%22 Oct →
dust213–50.0123%22 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0312%22 Oct →
nuke13–00.0131%19 Oct →
anubis13–90.0510%19 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0112%15 Oct →
anubis13–80.0615%15 Oct →
inferno13–40.0212%15 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0112%15 Oct →
cache13–00.0818%15 Oct →
nuke13–80.0012%15 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0520%15 Oct →
nuke13–30.0414%12 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0417%12 Oct →
dust213–30.0620%12 Oct →
cache13–2-0.037%12 Oct →
dust213–30.0421%12 Oct →
inferno13–50.0417%12 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0413%12 Oct →
mirage13–90.0317%9 Oct →
dust213–30.0820%9 Oct →
ancient13–70.0315%8 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.0316%5 Oct →
cache13–100.0219%5 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0219%5 Oct →
dust213–90.0413%5 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0633%5 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0216%5 Oct →
dust25–130.0317%5 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0513%5 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.057%5 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0116%5 Oct →
dust24–130.0924%1 Oct →
nuke13–60.1222%30 Sept →
inferno12–120.0218%30 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0121%30 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0419%30 Sept →
rush_0017–8-0.0750%28 Sept →
mirage13–80.0518%24 Sept →
cache13–100.0218%24 Sept →
dust20–10-0.0427%21 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0712%21 Sept →
inferno11–130.0613%21 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.048%19 Sept →
dust213–70.0415%19 Sept →
ancient13–60.0510%19 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0014%17 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.029%17 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0226%17 Sept →
anubis7–130.0020%17 Sept →
dust213–110.0120%17 Sept →
nuke13–100.0226%16 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0015%16 Sept →
cache11–130.0725%29 Aug →
dust213–30.0517%29 Aug →
mirage3–130.0334%29 Aug →
nuke13–110.0715%20 Aug →
mirage11–130.0516%20 Aug →
dust27–130.0030%19 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0416%19 Aug →
dust213–50.0523%18 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0421%18 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0114%17 Aug →
dust23–130.0311%17 Aug →
cache13–6-0.034%16 Aug →
cache13–30.0413%16 Aug →
cache4–130.0123%16 Aug →
nuke8–130.0122%15 Aug →
mirage12–120.0820%15 Aug →
inferno13–40.1519%15 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0420%15 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.