KranG

KranG — CS2 Stats

SE76561197961724658[U:1:1458930]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,106Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,827Top 50% of 204,793 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#69586 of 252070 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+421Premier CS Rating · 20,406 → 20,827

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,827 +4,936 29 Aug – 15 Oct · 28 days played
14,70820,827peak 20,82729 Aug15 Oct
21,161Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,827
  • +3,641 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,173 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKranGFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER20,827 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning55
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61–36–3Last 10061%Win rateWLLWWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +12.3pp headshot accuracy · +43ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility5.6
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.5
Utility5.6
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time524ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 560ms → last ⅓ avg 524ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–6 · anubis, 16 Sept →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · mirage, 8 Sept →
352msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · anubis, 8 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 4 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
14–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 20dust2Weakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2719–870%0.02
infernoS2016–480%0.02
dust2D186–1233%-0.00
cacheS1410–471%0.03
ancientC94–544%-0.00
anubisA74–357%0.04
mirageC52–340%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

29Matches
59%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
78.3ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
35%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno650%1.0816.5
Cache475%1.3416.0
Dust2450%1.1214.5
Nuke367%1.0316.0
Ancient367%0.9515.0
Mirage333%0.9919.3
Anubis333%0.7914.3
Vertigo1100%1.0016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
68.2%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
523msReaction time
38.6%T opening success
56.5%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
11.55HE damage / grenade
4.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.6454% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–90.0612%15 Oct →
nuke10–130.0438%15 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0136%15 Oct →
nuke13–110.1122%15 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0526%15 Oct →
inferno5–130.0418%14 Oct →
mirage10–130.0221%14 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.0422%13 Oct →
cache13–30.0429%12 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0320%12 Oct →
cache13–60.147%12 Oct →
cache13–40.039%12 Oct →
inferno13–100.0013%12 Oct →
ancient13–60.016%8 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.029%8 Oct →
anubis13–80.006%8 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0316%8 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0418%7 Oct →
inferno16–140.0413%7 Oct →
nuke16–120.0922%7 Oct →
nuke8–130.0017%6 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0131%6 Oct →
nuke13–40.0925%5 Oct →
nuke16–130.1214%5 Oct →
dust29–130.0218%5 Oct →
inferno13–70.0521%5 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0414%4 Oct →
ancient13–110.0818%4 Oct →
dust213–60.0629%4 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0527%4 Oct →
anubis13–00.0924%4 Oct →
nuke16–140.0120%4 Oct →
nuke13–60.0429%4 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0733%4 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0419%3 Oct →
cache13–11-0.039%3 Oct →
nuke6–130.0028%3 Oct →
inferno16–140.0823%3 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0118%30 Sept →
mirage13–70.0224%30 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0117%28 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0410%28 Sept →
nuke13–10.0125%28 Sept →
inferno13–80.0721%28 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0620%28 Sept →
ancient13–60.0720%27 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0217%27 Sept →
inferno16–130.0428%26 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.088%26 Sept →
cache16–120.0212%26 Sept →
inferno13–100.0112%25 Sept →
inferno13–80.0030%25 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0226%24 Sept →
ancient15–150.0128%24 Sept →
cache13–110.0327%24 Sept →
nuke13–110.0326%24 Sept →
ancient11–130.0124%20 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0629%20 Sept →
anubis13–90.0924%18 Sept →
nuke10–130.0016%17 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0331%17 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0132%16 Sept →
anubis13–60.1731%16 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0219%15 Sept →
cache13–30.1214%14 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0213%14 Sept →
dust213–70.0130%12 Sept →
nuke13–50.0321%12 Sept →
inferno13–80.0121%12 Sept →
nuke13–80.0820%12 Sept →
inferno13–2-0.0021%12 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0126%11 Sept →
inferno13–40.0817%11 Sept →
inferno13–90.0017%11 Sept →
dust215–150.0433%10 Sept →
cache13–90.0838%10 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.0013%10 Sept →
inferno13–40.0125%10 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0716%10 Sept →
dust213–40.1232%10 Sept →
cache11–130.0228%8 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0247%8 Sept →
dust215–150.0234%8 Sept →
inferno9–70.0333%8 Sept →
nuke9–30.0421%8 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0217%3 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0211%3 Sept →
dust28–13-0.038%3 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0312%3 Sept →
nuke13–110.0122%3 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0223%1 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0415%1 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0333%1 Sept →
dust213–30.0622%1 Sept →
nuke13–110.0525%1 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0414%31 Aug →
nuke13–30.0413%31 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0412%31 Aug →
cache13–60.0622%31 Aug →
cache13–50.0728%31 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.