frosty

frosty — CS2 Stats

76561197961367051[U:1:1101323]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,472Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,066 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,472 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 8 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,584 -1,862 8 Mar19 Jun · 29 days played
24,89427,501peak 27,5018 Mar19 Jun
27,683Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,066Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-03-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,066
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 434 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfrostyFACEITLevel 9 · 2,066 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,066csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning58
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46495Last 10046%Win rateLLWLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · +53ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility7.0
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.6

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.8
Utility7.0
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact1.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time538ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 20 Mar
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · dust2, 16 Apr
250msFastest reaction time · 0–5 · dust2, 19 May
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 7 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 8mirageWeakest map · 31% over 29
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2992031%-0.01
dust2C27121544%0.01
ancientB147750%0.00
infernoS86275%0.02
anubisA74357%0.02
overpassB63350%0.01
cacheA53260%0.02
nuke42250%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 29). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,380Matches
51%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
81.4ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19252%1.0815.7
Dust213359%1.1016.6
Ancient11550%1.1116.1
Anubis9944%1.0216.0
Inferno8938%1.0315.6
Overpass4060%1.0214.8
Nuke1844%1.0116.2
Vertigo1527%0.9016.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
86.8%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
543msReaction time
34.0%T opening success
54.2%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
10.22HE damage / grenade
20.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.9548% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 29 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0320%28 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0117%19 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0612%14 Jun
ancient9–130.0818%13 Jun
mirage13–90.0327%11 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0318%9 Jun
mirage13–90.0417%9 Jun
dust210–13-0.0335%5 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0120%5 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0418%5 Jun
nuke5–10.098%5 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0319%5 Jun
dust23–13-0.0019%5 Jun
nuke14–160.0320%4 Jun
cache11–130.0220%4 Jun
dust28–130.0640%4 Jun
mirage13–16-0.0117%1 Jun
ancient13–70.0318%1 Jun
dust213–9-0.0821%1 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0322%29 May
cache3–130.0242%27 May
mirage13–160.0133%26 May
nuke13–5-0.0119%26 May
ancient7–13-0.0522%26 May
mirage2–13-0.0130%26 May
inferno7–130.0522%26 May
cache13–70.1221%19 May
dust20–5-0.170%19 May
ancient15–150.0420%18 May
inferno13–70.0628%18 May
ancient13–10-0.0213%18 May
dust215–150.0219%18 May
mirage13–7-0.0130%18 May
dust213–90.0441%17 May
dust213–110.0530%17 May
anubis4–13-0.115%9 May
anubis13–70.0822%9 May
ancient11–13-0.0126%9 May
mirage8–130.0228%9 May
dust213–90.0028%3 May
mirage15–15-0.0316%3 May
dust213–30.0411%3 May
cache13–5-0.0233%3 May
dust211–130.0829%30 Apr
cache13–4-0.0343%30 Apr
mirage16–120.0123%26 Apr
dust26–130.0244%26 Apr
inferno13–30.0229%26 Apr
dust213–50.0335%16 Apr
dust24–13-0.0550%16 Apr
ancient13–3-0.0218%16 Apr
anubis13–30.0212%16 Apr
overpass13–100.0027%10 Apr
mirage13–60.0730%10 Apr
ancient13–50.0024%10 Apr
mirage19–220.0318%9 Apr
anubis25–220.1122%9 Apr
mirage7–30.0644%9 Apr
anubis5–130.0113%9 Apr
overpass13–80.0830%7 Apr
inferno13–50.0525%7 Apr
dust213–20.1336%7 Apr
mirage5–130.0022%7 Apr
ancient13–70.0223%7 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0122%7 Apr
dust213–16-0.0327%5 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0318%22 Mar
dust29–130.0427%21 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0518%21 Mar
anubis13–20.0513%21 Mar
dust29–130.0737%21 Mar
dust210–13-0.0519%21 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0120%21 Mar
dust213–30.1325%20 Mar
overpass7–130.1019%20 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0720%20 Mar
dust213–110.0726%20 Mar
mirage5–130.0440%20 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0439%20 Mar
mirage13–4-0.063%18 Mar
ancient15–150.0317%16 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0121%16 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0122%16 Mar
dust23–13-0.0115%16 Mar
dust213–110.0124%14 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0314%13 Mar
dust25–13-0.0215%13 Mar
mirage8–130.0124%13 Mar
dust213–50.0825%12 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0424%12 Mar
overpass10–13-0.0219%12 Mar
inferno13–110.0432%12 Mar
overpass11–13-0.0230%12 Mar
inferno13–6-0.0520%8 Mar
dust213–6-0.0322%8 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0120%8 Mar
dust215–15-0.0424%8 Mar
inferno11–130.0320%8 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0125%8 Mar
nuke8–130.0725%8 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →