CHACA

CHACA — CS2 Stats

US76561197972774990[U:1:12509262]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,128Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating29,034Top 1% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1109 of 227054 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,324 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,128 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 12 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 29,034 +1,995 12 Jul17 Sept · 28 days played
26,28129,385peak 29,38512 Jul17 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,324 +0 30 Aug17 Sept · 6 observations
2,3242,324peak 2,32430 Aug17 Sept
29,385Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,324Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-07-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,324
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 176 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 351 below peak (29,385)
  • -12 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 966 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCHACAFACEITLevel 9 · 2,324 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER29,034 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,324csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning40
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY6238Last 10062%Win rateWWLLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Last 20

  • 164 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility6.5
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch4.4

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 37% on T to 19% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning4.0
Utility6.5
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time568ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 10 Sept
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · ancient, 13 Aug
375msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · ancient, 13 Aug
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 18 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
W2Current streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 71% over 28cacheWeakest map · 46% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2820871%0.01
mirageA2012860%0.00
ancientA149564%0.02
cacheB136746%-0.03
anubisA127558%0.00
infernoS107370%0.01
nuke31233%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,568Matches
51%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
76.8ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18948%1.0214.8
Dust214756%1.0315.2
Anubis14047%0.9915.7
Ancient13645%1.0216.0
Inferno10658%1.1315.6
Overpass2871%1.2317.4
Cache2050%1.0815.4
Nuke128%0.8012.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.0%Spray accuracy
81.8%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
560msReaction time
37.3%T opening success
18.9%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
13.04HE damage / grenade
12.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.2887% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–1-0.057%12 Sept
dust213–11-0.0523%12 Sept
anubis2–130.0315%10 Sept
dust29–13-0.056%10 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0121%10 Sept
inferno13–4-0.016%10 Sept
dust213–70.0720%10 Sept
dust213–10.1825%10 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0314%8 Sept
mirage3–13-0.1111%5 Sept
dust213–50.0925%5 Sept
dust213–9-0.0313%3 Sept
ancient13–100.0214%2 Sept
ancient13–80.0417%30 Aug
inferno13–60.0419%29 Aug
ancient13–1-0.034%29 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0218%26 Aug
ancient13–100.0430%24 Aug
dust213–7-0.0110%23 Aug
anubis13–40.0611%21 Aug
anubis7–130.0122%18 Aug
ancient11–130.0014%16 Aug
ancient8–130.0226%16 Aug
cache9–13-0.0327%16 Aug
dust28–13-0.0136%16 Aug
dust27–13-0.0015%15 Aug
dust213–10-0.0118%14 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0218%14 Aug
ancient2–13-0.07100%13 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0014%13 Aug
cache13–40.0521%10 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0536%7 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0127%7 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0719%7 Aug
inferno16–120.0618%4 Aug
dust29–130.0226%3 Aug
anubis13–20.0318%3 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0416%2 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0117%2 Aug
dust214–160.0023%2 Aug
ancient11–130.0720%2 Aug
dust213–100.0218%2 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0815%2 Aug
nuke13–50.0624%1 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0217%1 Aug
anubis16–13-0.098%1 Aug
cache13–7-0.0833%1 Aug
dust216–140.0321%1 Aug
dust213–90.0117%1 Aug
inferno13–60.049%31 Jul
mirage19–15-0.0210%30 Jul
cache3–130.0615%30 Jul
ancient13–60.046%30 Jul
cache14–16-0.0329%30 Jul
mirage13–40.0827%28 Jul
dust219–16-0.0121%28 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0121%25 Jul
anubis3–60.0636%25 Jul
dust24–13-0.0629%22 Jul
anubis13–110.0412%22 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0317%22 Jul
inferno13–10.035%22 Jul
dust213–11-0.0219%22 Jul
inferno5–13-0.079%21 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0217%21 Jul
cache16–14-0.0721%21 Jul
mirage13–80.025%21 Jul
dust213–110.0014%21 Jul
anubis5–13-0.059%18 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0221%18 Jul
cache13–7-0.0811%18 Jul
mirage13–50.054%18 Jul
ancient13–00.0043%18 Jul
cache12–16-0.0316%16 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0657%16 Jul
dust213–80.0012%15 Jul
mirage13–60.0522%15 Jul
inferno11–130.0322%15 Jul
cache2–13-0.0819%15 Jul
dust213–8-0.0230%15 Jul
mirage13–70.0419%15 Jul
mirage13–60.0721%15 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0017%15 Jul
ancient13–90.0521%14 Jul
dust213–8-0.0012%14 Jul
cache2–13-0.0427%14 Jul
cache13–100.0925%14 Jul
mirage13–90.0318%14 Jul
ancient16–130.0716%13 Jul
dust211–13-0.075%13 Jul
cache0–13-0.10100%13 Jul
dust212–16-0.0513%13 Jul
mirage8–130.0717%13 Jul
dust213–70.0713%12 Jul
dust213–8-0.0310%12 Jul
cache13–30.009%12 Jul
mirage13–110.0022%12 Jul
dust213–10.1124%12 Jul
inferno13–20.0820%12 Jul
anubis13–100.038%12 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →