faint

faint — CS2 Stats

76561197961182320[U:1:916592]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

514Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating14,229Blue band · top ~32.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 7 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,229 -874 11 Aug13 Sept · 6 days played
13,40115,103peak 15,10311 Aug13 Sept
15,103Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-08-07

Premier CS Rating

  • 874 below peak (15,103)
  • -874 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 771 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfaintFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,229 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning40
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57385Last 10057%Win rateWLWWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.06 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility4.2
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.0
Utility4.2
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time534ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 568ms → last ⅓ avg 534ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.34Best match rating · 9–3 · debris, 7 Sept
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · cache, 27 Aug
359msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · anubis, 10 Sept
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 14 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2213959%-0.01
anubisB136746%-0.02
vertigoA138562%-0.03
nukeS96367%0.01
ancientA74357%-0.03
dust2D62433%-0.00
cacheS65183%-0.01
eldorado41325%-0.13
mirage41325%0.01
office32167%0.02
train330100%0.01
poseidon330100%0.08
boulder31233%-0.06
debris21150%0.16
overpass110100%-0.05
fachwerk1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

145Matches
50%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
61.8ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno3067%0.9210.9
Anubis2335%0.749.9
Cache2060%0.7711.0
Dust21932%0.8711.7
Vertigo1968%0.8611.5
Ancient1638%0.7610.4
Nuke1338%0.7310.8
Mirage560%0.8311.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
80.0%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
524msReaction time
33.5%T opening success
25.7%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
9.97HE damage / grenade
4.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.429 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.5494% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass9–7-0.0520%15 Sept
eldorado3–9-0.290%15 Sept
inferno13–10.0214%13 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0515%13 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0213%12 Sept
nuke13–3-0.0117%11 Sept
vertigo12–16-0.0315%11 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0426%11 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0128%10 Sept
anubis13–30.0714%10 Sept
inferno10–130.0212%10 Sept
nuke13–90.0315%10 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0222%9 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0316%9 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0517%9 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0314%9 Sept
office9–130.0127%8 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0424%8 Sept
vertigo20–22-0.0417%8 Sept
debris9–30.3415%7 Sept
nuke9–70.0320%7 Sept
inferno8–8-0.0519%7 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0334%7 Sept
train13–10-0.036%6 Sept
inferno5–13-0.056%6 Sept
office13–80.0118%6 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0019%4 Sept
anubis3–13-0.0715%4 Sept
inferno13–40.0326%4 Sept
nuke5–130.0616%4 Sept
dust211–13-0.0424%3 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0113%3 Sept
mirage7–30.0828%2 Sept
vertigo13–4-0.0716%2 Sept
ancient5–130.0121%2 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0426%1 Sept
vertigo9–40.1928%1 Sept
vertigo13–7-0.0717%1 Sept
inferno8–80.0420%31 Aug
eldorado1–9-0.238%31 Aug
nuke9–70.0316%31 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0229%28 Aug
inferno8–80.0419%28 Aug
vertigo8–8-0.1013%28 Aug
poseidon9–50.0613%28 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0811%27 Aug
cache13–7-0.0335%27 Aug
anubis13–3-0.0322%26 Aug
vertigo13–5-0.0410%26 Aug
vertigo13–6-0.0517%26 Aug
train13–10-0.0818%25 Aug
boulder0–2-0.090%25 Aug
office13–40.020%25 Aug
poseidon9–40.1227%25 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0213%25 Aug
anubis13–110.0230%24 Aug
inferno13–40.0332%24 Aug
dust211–13-0.0320%24 Aug
nuke13–30.0231%24 Aug
cache13–70.0113%23 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0321%23 Aug
cache13–9-0.0519%23 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0414%21 Aug
vertigo13–10-0.0228%21 Aug
eldorado5–9-0.0113%21 Aug
debris7–9-0.038%21 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0713%20 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0610%20 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0614%20 Aug
cache13–4-0.0622%20 Aug
dust29–130.0030%20 Aug
eldorado9–60.0215%18 Aug
poseidon9–40.0718%18 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0416%18 Aug
anubis13–40.0526%18 Aug
dust23–13-0.0725%18 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0721%18 Aug
ancient13–40.0021%17 Aug
vertigo13–11-0.0016%17 Aug
anubis11–130.017%17 Aug
dust213–10-0.0111%16 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0915%16 Aug
inferno13–10.0523%16 Aug
vertigo13–10-0.088%16 Aug
vertigo14–16-0.0718%15 Aug
cache3–130.0115%15 Aug
dust213–00.1323%14 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0020%14 Aug
train13–100.1619%13 Aug
inferno13–50.0219%13 Aug
fachwerk12–12-0.0420%11 Aug
boulder7–13-0.077%11 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0211%11 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0335%11 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0529%10 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0225%8 Aug
cache13–30.0522%8 Aug
boulder13–3-0.0118%8 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0317%7 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0424%7 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →