dEnnis

dEnnis — CS2 Stats

DE76561197960931110[U:1:665382]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,954Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,771Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,679 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,679 → 1,679
+6Tracked matches · now 1,954
0.0ppWin rate · 46.2% → 46.2%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 21 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,164 -411 21 May29 Aug · 7 days played
18,91719,575peak 19,57521 May29 Aug
Faceit ELO: 1,679 +0 29 Aug14 Sept · 4 observations
1,6791,679peak 1,67929 Aug14 Sept
19,575Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,679Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-05-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,679
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 72 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches521−16
Win rate60%57%+3pp
K/D0.701.42−0.72
Headshot %41%51%−10pp

Measured 14 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 14 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate43.0%46.8%48.3%5.2% short
Shot accuracy17.1%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.021.061.070.05 short
Match win rate49.5%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdEnnisFACEITLevel 8 · 1,679 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,679csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning42
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY474013Last 10047%Win rateLWWLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −5.1pp headshot accuracy · −64ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 20

  • 1172 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility6.6
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.2
Utility6.6
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact3.7

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time590ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.35Best match rating · 9–0 · debris, 6 Sept
48%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · debris, 6 Sept
359msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · ancient, 26 Jul
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 26 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
45In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

debrisBest map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A31171455%0.01
anubisD134931%-0.00
infernoA116555%0.02
ancientD113827%0.00
cacheS107370%0.00
debrisS54180%0.17
mirage42250%-0.01
eldorado43175%0.06
train4040%-0.01
poseidon3030%-0.05
nuke2020%-0.11
overpass110100%0.05
vertigo1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

84,403Lifetime kills
1.02K/D
4,234Matches
49.5%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
43.0%Headshot %
17.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
11,747MVPs
1,890Hours (in match)
5,830Bombs planted
1,329Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,530
AWP4,315
Knife2,015
MP91,669
FAMAS1,274

Lifetime map wins

9,186inferno
9,063dust2
2,772train
1,940nuke
1,569vertigo
871cbble
42lake
12office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,635Matches
50%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
71.7ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5360%1.0314.1
Dust24953%0.9414.3
Anubis4538%1.0514.9
Ancient4542%0.9714.1
Nuke2850%1.0014.4
Mirage2232%0.9513.6
Train944%0.9013.4
Overpass450%1.0615.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
75.7%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
582msReaction time
29.3%T opening success
38.6%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
17.15HE damage / grenade
13.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.3228% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust23–13-0.048%19 Sept
anubis13–4-0.0220%16 Sept
inferno13–100.0118%16 Sept
dust212–16-0.0015%16 Sept
dust22–13-0.0314%14 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0311%14 Sept
dust213–40.0714%9 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0924%9 Sept
eldorado9–10.0719%8 Sept
debris9–00.3419%8 Sept
overpass9–60.058%8 Sept
inferno9–30.1732%8 Sept
debris9–60.089%8 Sept
poseidon5–90.0121%8 Sept
eldorado8–8-0.0428%8 Sept
inferno1–9-0.1617%6 Sept
poseidon8–8-0.0839%6 Sept
eldorado9–40.1314%6 Sept
poseidon4–9-0.0817%6 Sept
eldorado9–40.0729%6 Sept
debris9–00.3548%6 Sept
debris8–80.0520%6 Sept
anubis0–7-0.110%6 Sept
inferno13–70.0618%6 Sept
mirage12–120.0015%5 Sept
ancient13–80.0417%5 Sept
dust213–80.1015%5 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0417%31 Aug
dust213–90.0220%31 Aug
train3–13-0.0720%24 Aug
dust25–13-0.0430%23 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0317%23 Aug
dust212–12-0.0216%23 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0127%23 Aug
inferno10–130.0822%20 Aug
cache13–30.1127%20 Aug
dust213–90.1527%20 Aug
anubis12–12-0.019%17 Aug
dust213–110.0415%17 Aug
dust28–13-0.0016%17 Aug
ancient4–130.0217%6 Aug
train5–130.0416%6 Aug
dust213–7-0.0531%6 Aug
dust212–120.0011%5 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0118%5 Aug
inferno6–130.0131%3 Aug
dust25–130.0219%3 Aug
cache11–13-0.0710%26 Jul
dust213–30.1126%26 Jul
ancient13–20.0122%26 Jul
dust213–00.2320%26 Jul
ancient7–130.0117%24 Jul
train12–120.0112%24 Jul
cache1–13-0.0511%24 Jul
debris9–70.0510%24 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0022%24 Jul
inferno12–120.0814%24 Jul
anubis11–130.0313%23 Jul
cache13–7-0.0216%10 Jul
dust213–8-0.0426%10 Jul
ancient0–13-0.150%10 Jul
cache13–3-0.0122%10 Jul
dust212–120.0116%10 Jul
dust213–4-0.0244%7 Jul
cache7–130.0223%7 Jul
anubis12–120.0130%7 Jul
dust213–7-0.0022%5 Jul
cache10–10.0214%5 Jul
ancient13–110.0418%5 Jul
inferno13–80.0719%2 Jul
nuke3–9-0.2413%3 Jun
cache13–10-0.0413%2 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0115%2 Jun
dust25–13-0.0722%1 Jun
anubis15–150.0218%1 Jun
dust213–60.0417%1 Jun
nuke11–130.0321%1 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0315%1 Jun
dust213–7-0.0120%1 Jun
dust212–120.0113%1 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0115%31 May
inferno13–7-0.038%31 May
cache13–90.0419%28 May
dust22–13-0.0429%28 May
vertigo10–13-0.0612%28 May
anubis10–130.0815%28 May
train11–13-0.0124%27 May
cache13–40.0513%27 May
dust213–40.0624%27 May
dust27–13-0.0413%27 May
ancient7–130.0610%26 May
dust213–11-0.0410%26 May
anubis13–40.0825%25 May
dust28–13-0.0113%25 May
anubis13–60.0120%25 May
inferno8–13-0.029%25 May
dust213–10.0221%25 May
ancient10–130.0018%22 May
ancient11–130.0511%22 May
dust213–80.0325%21 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →