rotm4nn`

rotm4nn` — CS2 Stats

76561197960484281[U:1:218553]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

976Tracked matches38%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 976 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,481 +2,738 27 Feb – 4 Jul · 31 days played
10,61914,294peak 14,29427 Feb4 Jul
14,348Peak Premier in tracked matches
42Days played since 2026-01-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrotm4nn`FACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning65
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–53–4Last 10043%Win rateTLLLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · −107ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–4–1 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 652ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim7.6
Utility5.7
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels5.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 650ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning6.5
Utility5.7
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time649ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 662ms → last ⅓ avg 649ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–10 · anubis, 19 Mar →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · anubis, 1 May →
445msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · vertigo, 16 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 9 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
8–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 50% over 14nukeWeakest map · 35% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2712–1544%0.04
nukeC207–1335%0.04
anubisB157–847%0.06
dust2B147–750%0.04
ancientB105–550%0.03
overpassC52–340%0.04
cache—41–325%0.03
mirage—31–233%-0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.12
debris—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5Matches
60%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
—ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
40.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
75.2%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
650msReaction time
38.7%T opening success
59.7%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
7.43HE damage / grenade
10.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.6893% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–15-0.0612%17 Jul →
anubis8–130.0615%17 Jul →
nuke6–130.0013%16 Jul →
inferno7–130.0118%16 Jul →
vertigo8–13-0.1218%16 Jul →
debris9–60.0622%16 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.0418%16 Jul →
cache13–110.0714%14 Jul →
dust213–90.1122%10 Jul →
inferno13–90.0315%4 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0611%4 Jul →
anubis13–80.0725%16 Jun →
anubis13–70.0831%16 Jun →
inferno13–40.0612%12 Jun →
inferno9–130.0215%12 Jun →
overpass9–130.0024%11 Jun →
anubis13–60.1021%11 Jun →
dust27–130.0618%29 May →
cache7–130.0220%29 May →
ancient6–130.0219%29 May →
nuke13–90.1323%28 May →
anubis11–130.0232%28 May →
inferno8–130.0814%28 May →
anubis8–130.1216%28 May →
ancient11–130.0317%22 May →
nuke13–80.0113%22 May →
mirage13–110.0016%22 May →
dust210–130.0426%20 May →
dust27–13-0.0222%20 May →
nuke11–130.0529%20 May →
inferno4–13-0.0317%20 May →
cache12–120.0832%10 May →
nuke7–130.0737%10 May →
inferno13–60.1023%8 May →
dust213–70.0822%8 May →
dust213–90.0223%8 May →
mirage5–130.0127%8 May →
inferno11–130.1018%8 May →
dust213–9-0.0033%8 May →
dust211–130.0322%3 May →
dust28–130.0420%3 May →
dust28–130.0516%3 May →
anubis13–9-0.0442%1 May →
inferno5–130.0137%1 May →
overpass8–130.0315%30 Apr →
nuke7–130.0230%30 Apr →
nuke15–150.1522%29 Apr →
inferno13–100.0224%26 Apr →
overpass10–130.0724%25 Apr →
nuke15–150.0718%23 Apr →
nuke5–13-0.0218%23 Apr →
dust216–140.1022%17 Apr →
ancient13–110.0017%17 Apr →
inferno13–16-0.0112%17 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0218%14 Apr →
inferno4–130.0413%14 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0316%14 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.0220%14 Apr →
nuke5–130.0914%10 Apr →
inferno13–100.1420%10 Apr →
anubis5–130.0121%10 Apr →
nuke13–90.0319%27 Mar →
inferno4–13-0.0637%24 Mar →
anubis13–100.1719%19 Mar →
inferno12–160.1021%17 Mar →
nuke5–130.0716%17 Mar →
inferno7–130.0319%15 Mar →
inferno13–8-0.0311%13 Mar →
inferno16–140.0215%13 Mar →
anubis13–40.1632%12 Mar →
ancient13–70.1030%9 Mar →
nuke13–110.0332%9 Mar →
nuke13–00.1113%9 Mar →
ancient16–130.1317%6 Mar →
anubis11–130.0614%6 Mar →
anubis11–130.0121%6 Mar →
nuke8–13-0.0118%6 Mar →
dust213–100.0419%6 Mar →
inferno13–100.1025%2 Mar →
ancient6–130.0210%28 Feb →
overpass13–90.0011%27 Feb →
inferno12–160.0416%27 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.0314%25 Feb →
inferno13–40.0310%25 Feb →
nuke13–80.0912%25 Feb →
anubis16–130.0313%25 Feb →
nuke8–13-0.059%23 Feb →
overpass13–110.0816%23 Feb →
inferno11–13-0.0123%23 Feb →
inferno13–100.0815%20 Feb →
inferno13–60.1110%20 Feb →
nuke13–100.1013%20 Feb →
ancient16–130.0821%7 Feb →
inferno5–13-0.0419%7 Feb →
nuke11–13-0.0614%2 Feb →
inferno13–110.0219%2 Feb →
inferno7–130.0320%2 Feb →
anubis6–130.0936%2 Feb →
dust213–50.0413%1 Jan →
dust28–13-0.0412%1 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.