tidy — CS2 Stats

76561197960404035[U:1:138307]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,629Tracked matches81%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating8.4 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating28,599Top 5% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#51 of 3243 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

28,599Peak Premier on CSDB

2,953Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,953
Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 47 to go
Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 28,599
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 1,401 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-08-28
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Performance scores

Aim95

Positioning72

Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY66–29–5Last 10066%Win rateWWWWLWWTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.5

Aggression10.0

Utility6.9

Positioning7.2

Opening Duels5.2

Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 41% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5

Positioning7.2

Utility6.9

Mechanics7.6

Opening Duels5.2

Win Impact10.0

Composite 8.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.05

Reaction time495ms−66ms

first ⅓ avg 561ms → last ⅓ avg 495ms

Headshot accuracy28.0%−3.1%

first ⅓ avg 31.1% → last ⅓ avg 28.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — inferno 13–3

13–1Biggest win — ancient

9Longest win streak

W4Current streak

9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 12dust2Weakest map · 57% over 40

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	40	23–17	57%	0.03
mirage	S	25	17–8	68%	0.03
ancient	S	12	9–3	75%	0.05
anubis	S	10	7–3	70%	0.07
inferno	—	4	4–0	100%	0.09
cache	—	4	2–2	50%	0.03
nuke	—	3	2–1	67%	0.02
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05
fachwerk	—	1	1–0	100%	0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (57% over 40). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

513Matches

61%Win rate

1.50Avg K/D

87.7ADR

54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	124	58%	1.40	18.1
Ancient	106	58%	1.42	18.7
Dust2	100	60%	1.46	17.9
Anubis	73	71%	1.61	18.3
Inferno	32	56%	1.58	18.7
Vertigo	22	77%	2.42	20.7
Nuke	21	48%	1.33	16.2
Overpass	14	57%	1.20	15.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.5%Headshot accuracy

39.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.0%Spray accuracy

84.2%Counter-strafing

7.7°Preaim

496msReaction time

40.6%T opening success

61.2%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

11.4%Flash assists

6.51HE damage / grenade

18.33Flashes / match

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–3	0.06	31%	25 Aug →
mirage	7–7	0.07	13%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.03	20%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.05	20%	25 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.01	33%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.03	31%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.10	21%	25 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.03	16%	25 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	18%	25 Aug →
dust2	0–2	0.00	33%	25 Aug →
mirage	8–1	0.05	36%	24 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	0.05	20%	24 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.05	34%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.13	37%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.21	45%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.10	35%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.08	28%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	27%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	31%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.11	28%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.10	39%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.06	31%	22 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.08	24%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.06	19%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.04	45%	22 Aug →
ancient	1–7	-0.02	6%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.09	19%	19 Aug →
anubis	15–15	0.00	21%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.06	38%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–1	-0.05	31%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.02	33%	18 Aug →
dust2	2–13	0.05	32%	18 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	31%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	31%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.09	17%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.10	21%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.18	43%	17 Aug →
inferno	16–14	0.06	46%	17 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.00	34%	17 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	24%	17 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.04	23%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	21%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.08	37%	15 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.02	33%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.04	25%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	35%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.03	29%	15 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.05	36%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.06	32%	15 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	43%	15 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.04	45%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.09	27%	15 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.04	17%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.16	22%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.01	25%	12 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.04	16%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.06	25%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.05	19%	11 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.01	23%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.00	27%	11 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.10	21%	11 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.01	22%	11 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.04	11%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.16	29%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.00	26%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.08	21%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	25%	9 Aug →
dust2	14–16	0.00	27%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.01	21%	9 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	29%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.02	24%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	52%	9 Aug →
mirage	0–3	-0.12	0%	9 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	45%	9 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.01	37%	9 Aug →
mirage	12–6	0.00	26%	9 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.00	25%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.04	24%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.10	16%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.05	28%	4 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.06	33%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.02	20%	4 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.00	29%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.07	38%	1 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.00	34%	1 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.02	45%	1 Aug →
fachwerk	13–7	0.14	21%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.04	33%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.03	38%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.07	42%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.07	33%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.08	23%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–16	0.08	31%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.08	32%	29 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.05	40%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.09	36%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.03	36%	28 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.06	36%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.04	36%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.05	36%	26 Jul →