𒅒 Sabel 𒈔 — CS2 Stats

AU76561198219169875[U:1:258904147]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,370Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.7 StrongPositional Player

Premier CS Rating31,192Top 1% of 204,056 CSDB-tracked playersGold band · top ~0.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#87 of 251140 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,541 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 31,192 +3,094 19 Aug – 8 Oct · 20 days played

Faceit ELO: 2,541 +0 31 Aug – 23 Sept · 7 observations

31,192Peak Premier in tracked matches

2,541Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

35Days played since 2026-08-19

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,541
0 over 30 days · steady
Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 459 to go
Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-31
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 31,192
+851 over 30 days · improving
Reached: Gold band · Red band · Pink band · Purple band
Gold band first seen 2026-09-04
Red band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning71

Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY67–29–4Last 10067%Win rateWWWWLTTTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.0pp headshot accuracy · −15ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

4–1 · 80% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 20%
Avg reaction 427ms

Last 10

5–2–3 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 20%
Avg reaction 433ms

Last 20

11–5–4 · 55% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 19%
Avg reaction 440ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim9.0

Utility6.2

Positioning7.1

Opening Duels4.5

Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like iM 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 60% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning7.1

Utility6.2

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels7.0

Win Impact6.3

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time447ms−59ms

first ⅓ avg 506ms → last ⅓ avg 447ms

Headshot accuracy18.1%+1.1%

first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 27 Aug →

35%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · mirage, 20 Sept →

328msFastest reaction time · 16–13 · cache, 8 Oct →

13–0Biggest win · dust2, 31 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak

W4Current streak

8–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 90% over 10ancientWeakest map · 58% over 26

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	29	19–10	66%	0.02
ancient	A	26	15–11	58%	0.01
dust2	S	25	19–6	76%	0.03
anubis	S	10	9–1	90%	0.03
cache	S	6	5–1	83%	0.01
inferno	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.03
nuke	—	2	0–2	0%	0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (58% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,211Matches

57%Win rate

1.18Avg K/D

88.1ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	257	56%	1.15	17.0
Mirage	252	55%	1.14	17.3
Dust2	245	59%	1.21	17.1
Anubis	85	51%	1.10	15.7
Inferno	36	72%	1.20	17.3
Vertigo	32	66%	1.21	17.5
Nuke	31	39%	1.07	17.4
Train	30	60%	1.13	18.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy

39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.7%Spray accuracy

79.0%Counter-strafing

8.0°Preaim

441msReaction time

60.1%T opening success

56.2%CT opening success

0.69Enemies flashed / flash

10.3%Flash assists

11.93HE damage / grenade

7.82Flashes / match

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	8–0	0.07	32%	8 Oct →
cache	16–13	-0.02	16%	8 Oct →
dust2	13–8	0.09	18%	8 Oct →
cache	13–5	0.07	17%	7 Oct →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	15%	7 Oct →
dust2	15–15	0.03	11%	7 Oct →
ancient	12–12	0.03	27%	6 Oct →
dust2	12–12	0.02	18%	5 Oct →
anubis	13–5	0.08	25%	4 Oct →
dust2	20–22	-0.03	17%	2 Oct →
ancient	11–13	0.02	18%	2 Oct →
anubis	13–6	0.04	18%	2 Oct →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	17%	1 Oct →
dust2	13–6	0.12	24%	1 Oct →
mirage	5–13	0.00	14%	28 Sept →
ancient	13–11	0.02	16%	27 Sept →
mirage	13–11	0.03	9%	27 Sept →
anubis	11–13	-0.00	22%	26 Sept →
ancient	13–2	-0.01	14%	25 Sept →
inferno	12–12	-0.04	24%	22 Sept →
mirage	13–6	0.04	14%	21 Sept →
dust2	13–11	0.00	15%	21 Sept →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	23%	21 Sept →
mirage	8–13	0.02	13%	20 Sept →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	25%	20 Sept →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	24%	20 Sept →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	19%	20 Sept →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	10%	20 Sept →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	10%	20 Sept →
mirage	14–16	0.02	9%	20 Sept →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	35%	20 Sept →
dust2	16–13	0.05	13%	19 Sept →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	18%	19 Sept →
dust2	13–5	0.01	24%	18 Sept →
ancient	13–10	0.00	25%	17 Sept →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	28%	17 Sept →
ancient	10–13	0.06	14%	17 Sept →
ancient	9–13	0.02	21%	17 Sept →
ancient	13–4	0.10	22%	16 Sept →
nuke	7–13	0.01	21%	16 Sept →
dust2	6–0	0.00	20%	16 Sept →
ancient	11–13	-0.00	22%	13 Sept →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	20%	10 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.10	22%	10 Sept →
nuke	11–13	0.11	17%	10 Sept →
ancient	16–14	0.05	11%	9 Sept →
ancient	13–7	0.03	15%	9 Sept →
mirage	13–11	0.01	14%	8 Sept →
mirage	13–7	0.06	23%	7 Sept →
anubis	13–7	0.03	16%	7 Sept →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	21%	6 Sept →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	26%	3 Sept →
anubis	13–9	0.05	18%	3 Sept →
cache	9–13	-0.01	21%	3 Sept →
anubis	13–3	0.05	14%	2 Sept →
dust2	8–0	0.02	0%	2 Sept →
mirage	13–10	0.05	18%	2 Sept →
dust2	13–1	0.02	29%	2 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.08	17%	2 Sept →
ancient	10–1	-0.00	16%	2 Sept →
mirage	13–5	0.09	17%	2 Sept →
ancient	13–4	-0.01	19%	2 Sept →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	11%	31 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.06	13%	31 Aug →
anubis	13–1	0.04	20%	31 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.06	18%	31 Aug →
dust2	13–0	0.07	34%	31 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.04	29%	31 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	15%	30 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.04	14%	30 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	19%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	27%	30 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.01	11%	30 Aug →
ancient	14–16	0.02	17%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	16%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	24%	30 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.11	14%	30 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.01	13%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.15	18%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.08	13%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.05	12%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.03	20%	26 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.08	17%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	22%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.11	23%	25 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.00	15%	25 Aug →
cache	16–12	-0.01	13%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.05	6%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	21%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.13	23%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–4	-0.01	9%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.03	18%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.04	20%	20 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.06	18%	20 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.00	13%	20 Aug →
cache	13–2	-0.00	18%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	20%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.06	20%	19 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.02	15%	19 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.03	14%	19 Aug →