Neza — CS2 Stats

ZW76561197960361064[U:1:95336]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,049Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,282Hours in CS

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player

Premier CS Rating23,435Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#33982 of 220575 tracked

FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 23,435 → 23,435

+4Tracked matches · now 1,049

0.0ppWin rate · 53.3% → 53.3%

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 42 days played since 26 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,435 +3,435 26 May – 16 Sept · 29 days played

23,856Peak Premier in tracked matches

42Days played since 2026-05-26

Premier CS Rating

78 below peak (23,513)
+763 over 90 days
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,565 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=25,925), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	54.5%	51.0%
Shot accuracy	15.8%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.20	1.09
Match win rate	51.3%	48.4%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning63

Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–44–2Last 10054%Win rateWLLWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · −29ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 38%
Avg reaction 500ms

Last 10

6–4 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 32%
Avg reaction 558ms

Last 20

14–6 · 70% win rate
Avg rating 0.05
Avg headshot accuracy 34%
Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.9

Utility4.2

Positioning6.3

Opening Duels5.7

Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning6.3

Utility4.2

Mechanics7.9

Opening Duels5.0

Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time570ms−24ms

first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms

Headshot accuracy33.4%+7.3%

first ⅓ avg 26.1% → last ⅓ avg 33.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 7–13 · mirage, 29 May →

72%Best headshot accuracy · 6–9 · inferno, 13 Jun →

383msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 3 Jul →

13–0Biggest win · inferno, 11 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak

6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 83% over 12cacheWeakest map · 43% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	C	32	14–18	44%	0.04
dust2	B	18	9–9	50%	0.03
mirage	A	16	9–7	56%	0.05
anubis	S	12	10–2	83%	0.05
cache	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.00
ancient	A	7	4–3	57%	0.04
nuke	—	4	3–1	75%	0.01
poseidon	—	2	0–2	0%	0.04
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.09
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

163,201Lifetime kills

1.20K/D · Top 50% of Level 10 players

6,724Matches

51.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 10 players

54.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 10 players

15.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 10 players

25,141MVPs

3,282Hours (in match)

4,219Bombs planted

1,617Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4754,809

Desert Eagle23,721

M4A4 / M4A1-S21,360

AWP18,157

P2000 / USP-S10,888

Glock-186,394

SSG 084,159

SG 5532,279

Knife2,239

MP92,146

Lifetime map wins

20,225inferno

6,151dust2

1,716nuke

1,478vertigo

961train

473cbble

321office

133lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,231Matches

52%Win rate

1.22Avg K/D

89.6ADR

57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	163	56%	1.23	18.7
Anubis	121	47%	1.13	18.1
Inferno	119	45%	1.16	18.9
Ancient	81	53%	1.22	18.5
Dust2	35	51%	1.18	17.9
Overpass	26	50%	1.22	18.7
Cache	22	73%	1.32	19.9
Nuke	7	43%	1.02	22.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

33.4%Headshot accuracy

35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.0%Spray accuracy

85.5%Counter-strafing

8.4°Preaim

569msReaction time

50.3%T opening success

49.4%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

6.5%Flash assists

11.61HE damage / grenade

4.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.469 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–5	0.02	36%	13 Sept →
inferno	10–13	0.04	44%	13 Sept →
anubis	3–13	-0.02	21%	8 Sept →
vertigo	13–10	0.09	52%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.04	36%	7 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.02	18%	7 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.01	20%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	38%	12 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.04	22%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.08	38%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.05	39%	12 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.04	35%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	23%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.06	26%	11 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.08	41%	11 Jul →
anubis	16–14	0.03	38%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–0	0.22	35%	11 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.02	38%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.10	43%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.05	36%	10 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.07	45%	9 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.06	30%	9 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.04	41%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.03	37%	5 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.01	33%	4 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.02	13%	4 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	28%	3 Jul →
inferno	13–16	0.09	26%	3 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.00	31%	2 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.19	50%	2 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.04	29%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.11	24%	2 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.05	40%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.02	30%	1 Jul →
dust2	2–13	0.01	31%	30 Jun →
inferno	7–9	-0.06	32%	28 Jun →
nuke	8–8	-0.05	40%	26 Jun →
nuke	13–4	0.01	31%	24 Jun →
ancient	13–4	0.11	19%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.06	23%	24 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.04	29%	22 Jun →
anubis	13–6	-0.00	48%	22 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.05	20%	21 Jun →
cache	13–10	-0.02	22%	20 Jun →
inferno	13–4	0.05	28%	20 Jun →
mirage	14–16	0.05	25%	20 Jun →
dust2	1–5	0.03	33%	20 Jun →
inferno	1–13	-0.09	21%	20 Jun →
inferno	20–22	0.00	31%	19 Jun →
mirage	16–13	-0.03	25%	17 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.05	39%	17 Jun →
inferno	9–1	0.11	50%	17 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.05	29%	16 Jun →
inferno	16–13	0.03	14%	16 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	16%	15 Jun →
inferno	13–7	-0.04	19%	15 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	18%	15 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.09	19%	15 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.04	30%	14 Jun →
dust2	1–9	0.02	33%	14 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.07	29%	14 Jun →
ancient	13–7	0.12	24%	13 Jun →
inferno	13–5	0.01	21%	13 Jun →
inferno	6–9	0.12	72%	13 Jun →
inferno	13–5	0.11	39%	13 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	17%	13 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.00	20%	13 Jun →
inferno	10–13	0.02	17%	12 Jun →
poseidon	8–8	0.02	12%	12 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.01	30%	11 Jun →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	47%	11 Jun →
anubis	13–1	0.19	19%	11 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.03	39%	11 Jun →
overpass	16–13	0.09	21%	10 Jun →
inferno	13–6	-0.01	30%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.11	17%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.10	23%	9 Jun →
inferno	13–3	0.27	18%	9 Jun →
inferno	4–9	-0.13	18%	9 Jun →
cache	9–13	0.04	19%	7 Jun →
anubis	13–8	-0.02	18%	7 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.07	30%	6 Jun →
mirage	12–16	-0.01	21%	5 Jun →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	19%	1 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.03	20%	1 Jun →
inferno	9–7	0.14	54%	31 May →
poseidon	7–9	0.07	31%	31 May →
inferno	8–13	0.08	41%	31 May →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	17%	31 May →
ancient	0–13	-0.02	28%	31 May →
ancient	8–13	0.01	38%	30 May →
mirage	7–13	0.29	37%	29 May →
mirage	13–4	0.11	24%	29 May →
dust2	7–13	0.03	30%	29 May →
dust2	9–13	0.07	34%	28 May →
mirage	10–13	0.06	29%	28 May →
inferno	10–13	0.05	27%	27 May →
anubis	13–9	0.02	14%	27 May →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	15%	26 May →
inferno	12–16	-0.04	23%	26 May →