TacticGen — CS2 Stats

76561197960331398[U:1:65670]

1,259Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating12,393Blue band · top ~42.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (28 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,393 -786 24 May – 13 Sept · 19 days played
11,48814,878peak 14,87824 May13 Sept
14,922Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-05-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,485 below peak (14,878)
  • -1,701 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,607 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTacticGenFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER12,393 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning44
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–42–10Last 10048%Win rateLWLLTWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −3.7pp headshot accuracy · −81ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 660ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.8 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility7.2
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch0.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 46% on T to 30% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 690ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning4.4
Utility7.2
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact8.1

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time673ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 742ms → last ⅓ avg 673ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.37Best match rating · 9–2 · poseidon, 28 Jun →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · cache, 16 Jul →
469msFastest reaction time · 9–7 · inferno, 2 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 12 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 12mirageWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC166–1038%-0.04
nukeC167–944%-0.02
dust2A159–660%-0.01
anubisS128–467%-0.02
ancientA116–555%-0.01
mirageD102–820%-0.03
cacheC73–443%-0.01
overpass—43–175%-0.01
vertigo—32–167%0.07
poseidon—31–233%0.01
eldorado—21–150%-0.04
debris—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

220Matches
51%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
68.6ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

24%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke2361%0.8712.8
Dust22138%0.8012.5
Anubis2055%0.9313.7
Ancient1947%0.8813.2
Inferno1553%0.8714.7
Mirage1155%0.9517.4
Train956%0.7613.0
Cache540%1.2813.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
78.8%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
690msReaction time
46.4%T opening success
30.3%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
15.70HE damage / grenade
13.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 30.2909% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–13-0.068%27 Sept →
anubis13–10.069%27 Sept →
nuke3–9-0.0915%20 Sept →
inferno11–130.0918%13 Sept →
dust215–150.0127%13 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0112%3 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0318%3 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0612%3 Sept →
vertigo9–30.1430%3 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0526%23 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0117%20 Aug →
debris4–9-0.0411%16 Aug →
anubis14–160.0316%9 Aug →
inferno2–9-0.2133%9 Aug →
dust213–20.0424%6 Aug →
mirage11–130.0221%6 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0628%6 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0115%4 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0125%2 Aug →
dust213–80.0923%2 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0621%2 Aug →
nuke9–40.0625%2 Aug →
inferno9–7-0.0323%2 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.039%30 Jul →
cache13–110.0220%30 Jul →
dust215–150.0128%30 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0526%30 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.058%27 Jul →
nuke13–70.005%27 Jul →
vertigo8–80.0224%27 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0527%26 Jul →
anubis13–7-0.0123%26 Jul →
ancient13–80.0117%26 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0019%26 Jul →
poseidon3–9-0.2317%26 Jul →
inferno5–9-0.0924%26 Jul →
inferno15–15-0.0327%23 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0034%23 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0410%23 Jul →
nuke15–15-0.0218%23 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0210%23 Jul →
vertigo9–50.0516%23 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.028%22 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.067%22 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.065%22 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0417%22 Jul →
ancient16–130.0630%20 Jul →
dust213–90.0017%20 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0521%20 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0723%20 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0618%20 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0511%16 Jul →
nuke13–70.0510%16 Jul →
cache13–40.0735%16 Jul →
ancient13–110.0319%16 Jul →
eldorado9–40.0623%16 Jul →
eldorado1–9-0.1433%16 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0535%13 Jul →
cache10–13-0.088%13 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0814%13 Jul →
inferno9–4-0.1430%13 Jul →
anubis13–80.0117%12 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.038%12 Jul →
dust213–70.0021%12 Jul →
ancient13–0-0.0623%12 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0222%12 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.039%12 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0024%1 Jul →
inferno13–20.0513%1 Jul →
anubis13–16-0.0223%1 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0817%28 Jun →
overpass13–70.0519%28 Jun →
dust213–110.0121%28 Jun →
inferno13–70.0012%28 Jun →
ancient2–130.026%28 Jun →
nuke8–13-0.0724%28 Jun →
poseidon9–20.3731%28 Jun →
mirage10–130.0114%21 Jun →
overpass1–13-0.0819%21 Jun →
nuke13–9-0.0411%21 Jun →
inferno8–80.0316%21 Jun →
nuke9–30.0313%21 Jun →
anubis13–10-0.0115%18 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0412%18 Jun →
dust24–13-0.0614%18 Jun →
nuke13–60.0132%18 Jun →
mirage15–150.0123%7 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.1020%7 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0432%7 Jun →
nuke11–13-0.0416%7 Jun →
poseidon8–8-0.1133%7 Jun →
overpass13–90.0326%4 Jun →
ancient15–15-0.0112%4 Jun →
nuke15–15-0.0311%4 Jun →
ancient16–14-0.035%31 May →
anubis13–9-0.0318%31 May →
mirage13–10-0.0316%31 May →
overpass13–10-0.0521%31 May →
dust213–10-0.049%24 May →
nuke6–13-0.0516%24 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.