S4mmY

S4mmY — CS2 Stats

DE76561197960324814[U:1:59086]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,578Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating26,821Top 5% of 211,827 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7302 of 258879 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−426Premier CS Rating · 27,247 → 26,821

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,821 -1,524 16 Apr – 30 Oct · 32 days played
24,99928,691peak 28,69116 Apr30 Oct
28,691Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,620Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2026-04-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,870 below peak (28,691)
  • +1,032 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,822 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,179 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGS4mmYFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,821 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,620csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning47
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–46–3Last 10051%Win rateLWWWTLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.1pp headshot accuracy · +21ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 464ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 487ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 476ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility5.5
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.7
Utility5.5
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time501ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 523ms → last ⅓ avg 501ms
Headshot accuracy22.4%+5.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 24 Oct →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · inferno, 6 Jul →
344msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · inferno, 24 May →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 24 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 6nukeWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2613–1350%-0.00
infernoA2113–862%-0.01
dust2A159–660%0.02
cacheB136–746%-0.01
anubisB105–550%-0.02
nukeD71–614%-0.03
mirageS64–267%0.00
overpass—20–20%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,880Matches
52%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
66.2ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
19Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient25856%0.9112.7
Inferno18054%0.9413.1
Dust29644%0.9013.2
Nuke8944%0.9213.3
Overpass7060%0.9612.1
Anubis6144%0.8612.8
Mirage3060%1.0813.5
Vertigo1331%0.7912.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
72.6%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
500msReaction time
26.2%T opening success
40.9%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
9.72HE damage / grenade
12.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4691 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.2232% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0221%30 Oct →
cache13–100.0220%29 Oct →
inferno13–110.0825%28 Oct →
cache13–70.0335%27 Oct →
mirage15–150.0020%27 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0414%27 Oct →
inferno7–130.0220%25 Oct →
ancient9–130.0116%25 Oct →
cache9–13-0.028%24 Oct →
dust213–00.0825%24 Oct →
dust213–50.1031%24 Oct →
inferno9–12-0.0037%18 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0613%17 Oct →
nuke13–110.0130%17 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0123%17 Oct →
nuke11–130.0124%17 Oct →
dust213–60.0432%16 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0223%12 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.017%11 Oct →
mirage16–12-0.0114%11 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0730%10 Oct →
anubis13–80.0014%10 Oct →
mirage16–140.0519%10 Oct →
dust211–130.0321%10 Oct →
ancient13–110.0117%10 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0313%10 Oct →
cache13–80.0230%10 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0440%24 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0626%19 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0827%17 Sept →
ancient13–90.0118%17 Sept →
anubis13–110.0226%17 Sept →
ancient13–50.0122%27 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.048%18 Aug →
inferno13–90.0119%4 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0123%4 Aug →
inferno13–90.0719%30 Jul →
ancient13–70.0342%30 Jul →
anubis13–20.0114%30 Jul →
inferno15–15-0.0420%28 Jul →
ancient13–40.0334%23 Jul →
ancient11–130.0217%23 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0717%23 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0618%23 Jul →
cache13–80.0224%21 Jul →
dust213–40.0316%21 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0524%20 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0313%18 Jul →
ancient13–60.0119%18 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0019%18 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0212%17 Jul →
anubis13–50.0330%17 Jul →
ancient1–13-0.0331%17 Jul →
cache13–00.0721%16 Jul →
cache8–13-0.087%16 Jul →
inferno13–50.0114%14 Jul →
ancient13–50.098%6 Jul →
inferno13–00.0167%6 Jul →
inferno10–130.0229%5 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.078%5 Jul →
dust213–60.0624%3 Jul →
dust213–80.0324%3 Jul →
ancient15–150.0319%3 Jul →
ancient13–4-0.0315%24 Jun →
overpass11–13-0.0623%7 Jun →
nuke14–16-0.0421%1 Jun →
overpass6–13-0.0616%31 May →
ancient13–50.0213%31 May →
inferno11–13-0.0620%26 May →
anubis1–13-0.0421%26 May →
inferno0–13-0.0414%24 May →
dust213–8-0.0123%23 May →
inferno13–11-0.0524%17 May →
anubis11–13-0.0619%17 May →
inferno13–50.0418%16 May →
nuke12–16-0.0518%16 May →
dust213–160.0125%10 May →
ancient9–130.0124%10 May →
cache5–130.0413%6 May →
cache4–13-0.0716%6 May →
cache8–13-0.0612%6 May →
anubis1–13-0.0618%6 May →
inferno9–10.0215%6 May →
ancient13–9-0.0313%5 May →
ancient13–6-0.0311%4 May →
ancient13–5-0.0421%30 Apr →
mirage16–13-0.0110%29 Apr →
anubis10–13-0.0211%29 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.0616%28 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0315%26 Apr →
anubis13–50.0120%23 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0223%23 Apr →
dust213–40.0814%23 Apr →
ancient6–130.0114%23 Apr →
inferno13–40.0030%22 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0015%21 Apr →
anubis12–16-0.069%17 Apr →
inferno13–40.0213%17 Apr →
ancient17–190.0316%17 Apr →
ancient13–70.0222%16 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.