← Back to Matches
1win · Private Club #1: Closed Qualifier 2026 · Playoffs
C-Tier

K27 vs WW Team

Finished
Format: BO3·Played: Sep 9, 20:57 UTC
Like what you see? Place your bets on live CS2 matches.Bet on This Match →

Map Results

Dust2Dust2Map 1
LK27
LW
WWW Team
Duration: 45:29
CacheCacheMap 2
WK27
WL
LWW Team
Duration: 44:24
MirageMirageMap 3
WK27
WL
LWW Team
Duration: 36:10

Streams

Map Breakdown

Series best: X5G7V 1.36 average rating across 3 maps.

Mirage

K27 135 WW Team
K271st half 8 · 2nd half 5CT 8/12 · T 5/6Pistols 1/2
WW Team1st half 4 · 2nd half 1CT 1/6 · T 4/12Pistols 1/2
PlayerKDA+/−ADRKASTRating
xeedoK2721104+11131.789%1.94
X5G7VK271684+889.383%1.55
kashl1dK271592+673.683%1.24
dekoWW Team17130+493.472%1.22
qw1nk1K2712111+178.878%1.14
m3wsuWW Team10162-675.044%0.98
kelieNWW Team11133-262.750%0.88
claxK2710106+073.472%0.87
ct0mWW Team5154-1043.461%0.50
StRoGoWW Team5175-1238.444%0.41

Cache

K27 136 WW Team
K271st half 7 · 2nd half 6CT 6/7 · T 7/12Pistols 1/2
WW Team1st half 5 · 2nd half 1CT 5/12 · T 1/7Pistols 1/2
PlayerKDA+/−ADRKASTRating
kashl1dK2718106+885.690%1.71
m3wsuWW Team19143+5106.168%1.70
X5G7VK27151210+375.684%1.40
claxK2714106+480.079%1.27
xeedoK2711149-381.568%1.12
qw1nk1K279112-255.779%1.04
ct0mWW Team14135+190.484%0.91
kelieNWW Team13140-153.753%0.74
StRoGoWW Team5153-1036.453%0.45
dekoWW Team6133-736.153%0.42

Dust2

K27 1013 WW Team
K271st half 7 · 2nd half 3CT 7/12 · T 3/11Pistols 1/2
WW Team1st half 5 · 2nd half 8CT 8/11 · T 5/12Pistols 1/2

WW Team came back from 4 rounds down (0–4) to win the map.

PlayerKDA+/−ADRKASTRating
qw1nk1K2718173+180.774%1.31
dekoWW Team21169+5103.374%1.29
m3wsuWW Team16145+272.074%1.15
X5G7VK2719168+381.265%1.14
xeedoK2714169-274.074%1.01
StRoGoWW Team15141+153.278%1.01
ct0mWW Team13134+061.270%0.94
kashl1dK2712149-249.674%0.92
kelieNWW Team13165-365.057%0.88
claxK2710156-553.374%0.81

About K27 vs WW Team

This BO3 Counter-Strike 2 match is part of Playoffs on the 1win circuit. K27 took the series 2–1. For head-to-head form and predicted lineups, see the head-to-head tool and the prediction model.