Chaos — CS2 Stats
76561199838916691[U:1:1878650963]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
What changed since last observed
CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (22 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.
No change since then — still 65 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.
CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 11 days played since 13 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.
Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →
Rating over time
Premier CS Rating
- 2,465 below peak (29,114)
- Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,351 to go
- Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
- Red band first seen 2026-09-01
- Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.11 avg rating · −6.6pp headshot accuracy · +117ms reaction
Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.
Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches
Last 5
- 4–1 · 80% win rate
- Avg rating 0.04
- Avg headshot accuracy 26%
- Avg reaction 395ms
Last 10
- 7–3 · 70% win rate
- Avg rating 0.04
- Avg headshot accuracy 41%
- Avg reaction 321ms
Last 20
- 15–5 · 75% win rate
- Avg rating 0.10
- Avg headshot accuracy 44%
- Avg reaction 263ms
Newest first, from the last 61 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.
Player DNA
Primary style: Opening Duellist — Winning opening duels is what stands out in this profile (+2.6 against its own average). How often you WIN the first duel — CSDB cannot yet see how often you take it.
Sharp aimerLimited utility dependenceStrong positioning
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.
Your pro match
Plays most like s1mple 66% playstyle similarity
Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.
Where you differ: higher opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 99 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 8.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 61 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Personal bests
Across the last 61 tracked matches.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 mirage | S | 24 | 17–7 | 71% | 0.07 |
 dust2 | S | 14 | 12–2 | 86% | 0.07 |
 ancient | S | 8 | 7–1 | 88% | -0.01 |
 nuke | S | 6 | 6–0 | 100% | 0.08 |
 inferno | — | 4 | 4–0 | 100% | 0.09 |
 anubis | — | 3 | 2–1 | 67% | 0.08 |
 train | — | 2 | 2–0 | 100% | 0.05 |
Across the last 61 tracked matches.
Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (71% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4879 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dust2 | 13–1 | 0.04 | 44% | 31 Aug → | |
| mirage | 16–13 | -0.02 | 9% | 31 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–2 | 0.08 | 24% | 30 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | 0.04 | 16% | 30 Aug → | |
| mirage | 2–5 | 0.04 | 38% | 22 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–4 | 0.06 | 62% | 20 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–6 | 0.08 | 76% | 19 Aug → | |
| mirage | 3–0 | 0.06 | 100% | 19 Aug → | |
| mirage | 5–11 | 0.07 | 41% | 19 Aug → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | 0.00 | 0% | 18 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 0–2 | 0.00 | 0% | 18 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 0–2 | 0.00 | 0% | 17 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–3 | 0.12 | 31% | 17 Aug → | |
| mirage | 3–0 | 0.32 | 75% | 17 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 2–0 | 0.19 | 100% | 17 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–6 | 0.29 | 77% | 17 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | 0.19 | 77% | 17 Aug → | |
| mirage | 8–8 | 0.19 | 60% | 17 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | 0.13 | 34% | 17 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–5 | 0.08 | 23% | 17 Aug → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | -0.04 | 23% | 17 Aug → | |
| ancient | 1–1 | -0.08 | 0% | 17 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–4 | 0.08 | 16% | 17 Aug → | |
| train | 13–9 | 0.03 | 32% | 17 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–8 | 0.16 | 15% | 17 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.08 | 19% | 17 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–4 | 0.05 | 13% | 17 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–10 | -0.04 | 19% | 17 Aug → | |
| ancient | 10–13 | -0.01 | 29% | 17 Aug → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | 0.06 | 36% | 16 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 4–5 | 0.19 | 0% | 16 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | 0.03 | 30% | 16 Aug → | |
| train | 13–1 | 0.06 | 69% | 15 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–4 | -0.02 | 9% | 15 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–3 | 0.01 | 14% | 15 Aug → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | 0.08 | 50% | 15 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–7 | 0.07 | 83% | 15 Aug → | |
| anubis | 10–13 | 0.29 | 85% | 15 Aug → | |
| nuke | 5–2 | 0.27 | 50% | 15 Aug → | |
| mirage | 5–6 | 0.07 | 38% | 15 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–3 | 0.07 | 47% | 15 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | -0.02 | 33% | 15 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.01 | 13% | 15 Aug → | |
| mirage | 6–13 | 0.02 | 18% | 15 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–3 | -0.03 | 9% | 15 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–5 | 0.00 | 20% | 15 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | 0.03 | 83% | 15 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–0 | 0.00 | 0% | 14 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | 0.03 | 13% | 14 Aug → | |
| anubis | 13–6 | -0.05 | 21% | 14 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–1 | 0.04 | 14% | 14 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–5 | 0.03 | 14% | 14 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | 0.07 | 19% | 14 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | 0.06 | 19% | 14 Aug → | |
| anubis | 13–7 | 0.01 | 12% | 14 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–4 | -0.04 | 22% | 14 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–5 | 0.00 | 7% | 13 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–0 | 0.00 | 15% | 13 Aug → | |
| mirage | 7–0 | 0.15 | 0% | 13 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–4 | 0.03 | 40% | 13 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–0 | 0.04 | 13% | 13 Aug → |
Match data via Leetify.
