TANK — CS2 Stats
76561199831833877[U:1:1871568149]
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 10 median | vs Level 10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 42.1% | 52.8% | 10.7% short |
| Shot accuracy | 0.0% | 13.7% | 13.7% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.96 | 1.08 | 0.13 short |
| Match win rate | 60.5% | 49.2% | above |
This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.
Where you differ: lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 40 | 68% | 1.68 | 19.4 |
| Dust2 | 33 | 64% | 1.57 | 20.5 |
| Ancient | 12 | 33% | 1.43 | 20.8 |
| Anubis | 11 | 73% | 1.34 | 21.7 |
| Nuke | 5 | 80% | 1.65 | 23.0 |
| Inferno | 4 | 75% | 1.20 | 17.8 |
| Overpass | 3 | 67% | 1.70 | 21.0 |
| Cache | 2 | 100% | 1.70 | 16.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.9189% — below the 40% mark we flag