JOHAIDII

JOHAIDII — CS2 Stats

76561199810284774[U:1:1850019046]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

249Tracked matches32%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,638Purple band · top ~25.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Aug 2026 (35 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 5 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,638 +225 7 Aug16 Aug · 4 days played
15,29916,318peak 16,3187 Aug16 Aug
16,318Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-08-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 680 below peak (16,318)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 4,362 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJOHAIDIIFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER15,638 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning47
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD474310Last 10047%Win rateLLLLTLLTLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −5.6pp headshot accuracy · +48ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 041 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 10

  • 073 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 20

  • 4124 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility3.9
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch1.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.7
Utility3.9
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time607ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 653ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+4.2%
first ⅓ avg 13.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 8 Aug
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–9 · debris, 31 Aug
391msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 15 Aug
13–0Biggest win · cache, 28 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L4Current streak
45In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 91% over 11anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC25111444%0.01
mirageA2112957%-0.01
ancientS1110191%-0.01
cacheC83538%-0.03
trainD72529%-0.05
fachwerkA74357%0.01
dust2D62433%-0.01
nukeD62433%-0.00
anubisD51420%-0.01
office1010%-0.06
debris1010%-0.15
eldorado1010%-0.18
boulder1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

37Matches
70%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
66.6ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9100%0.849.6
Ancient743%0.9816.0
Nuke650%0.8910.2
Anubis450%0.5810.0
Dust23100%1.0414.7
Vertigo3100%1.4520.3
Inferno3100%1.1515.3
Cache20%0.7813.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
77.3%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
609msReaction time
25.2%T opening success
47.2%CT opening success
0.37Enemies flashed / flash
2.6%Flash assists
7.61HE damage / grenade
6.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.368 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.195% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis6–12-0.0212%19 Sept
inferno2–130.0011%17 Sept
mirage0–13-0.0215%17 Sept
train9–13-0.0532%17 Sept
cache12–12-0.037%14 Sept
mirage9–13-0.069%14 Sept
dust210–130.0414%13 Sept
dust212–12-0.0718%10 Sept
fachwerk6–13-0.0624%6 Sept
inferno8–8-0.0214%6 Sept
ancient13–3-0.0618%5 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0220%5 Sept
inferno13–40.1225%5 Sept
mirage12–12-0.0319%5 Sept
office5–13-0.064%2 Sept
inferno13–60.049%2 Sept
inferno1–9-0.260%31 Aug
nuke9–30.0613%31 Aug
debris0–9-0.15100%31 Aug
inferno3–10-0.046%29 Aug
dust212–120.0224%29 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0118%29 Aug
cache2–13-0.037%29 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0410%29 Aug
train12–12-0.117%28 Aug
mirage13–30.0725%28 Aug
cache13–0-0.0217%28 Aug
inferno8–130.0621%27 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0218%27 Aug
mirage16–12-0.009%26 Aug
fachwerk6–13-0.0213%26 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0026%26 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0118%26 Aug
fachwerk7–13-0.089%25 Aug
inferno8–80.0811%25 Aug
mirage6–130.0022%23 Aug
dust213–11-0.0124%21 Aug
mirage13–20.054%21 Aug
nuke13–40.0114%21 Aug
inferno12–120.0310%21 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0717%21 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0110%21 Aug
mirage13–90.006%20 Aug
eldorado2–9-0.1829%20 Aug
mirage13–110.0515%19 Aug
cache13–00.0319%19 Aug
fachwerk13–30.0021%19 Aug
mirage13–4-0.015%18 Aug
ancient5–13-0.065%16 Aug
inferno0–7-0.0415%16 Aug
nuke8–8-0.006%16 Aug
train9–130.0212%15 Aug
anubis12–120.0115%15 Aug
cache11–130.0011%15 Aug
inferno9–00.1178%15 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0014%15 Aug
ancient13–80.0116%15 Aug
fachwerk13–20.078%14 Aug
ancient13–80.017%14 Aug
dust29–13-0.047%14 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0316%14 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0312%14 Aug
train10–1-0.047%14 Aug
fachwerk13–40.0020%13 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0413%13 Aug
train5–13-0.1017%13 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0912%13 Aug
fachwerk13–70.1419%12 Aug
anubis13–30.045%12 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0828%12 Aug
train10–13-0.0714%12 Aug
nuke6–9-0.045%12 Aug
inferno9–30.0210%12 Aug
cache4–9-0.025%10 Aug
inferno6–130.0316%10 Aug
mirage11–130.0112%10 Aug
boulder1–6-0.0614%9 Aug
inferno11–130.0015%8 Aug
mirage5–3-0.018%8 Aug
inferno9–20.255%8 Aug
dust213–10.0125%7 Aug
cache0–13-0.016%7 Aug
mirage13–30.0012%7 Aug
ancient13–30.0532%7 Aug
inferno3–00.0214%7 Aug
ancient13–70.0110%7 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0114%7 Aug
mirage7–0-0.027%7 Aug
inferno9–50.0520%7 Aug
anubis2–13-0.039%7 Aug
anubis3–13-0.028%6 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0215%6 Aug
inferno13–30.0114%6 Aug
cache2–0-0.140%6 Aug
ancient13–20.057%6 Aug
inferno9–5-0.046%6 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0450%6 Aug
train13–100.0216%5 Aug
mirage13–40.0315%5 Aug
ancient13–50.0410%5 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →